|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Post Einstein Report Observation and a Question (not more of the same)
The FCA exploit worked regardless of programming language used.
As for 25, they had a bright flashlight on their robot that the drivers would use to line up shots manually. |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Post Einstein Report Observation and a Question (not more of the same)
The observation about programming was not meant to tie in at all to the report implications, per se; I'm just surprised the zero of the top 12 used Labview - wonder the the odds are for that? On the question, do you know they used the spotlight for targeting or is it that conjecture? If that's all you really needed (and it sure seemed to work for them) then our team spent a lot of time and energy on a far too complex solution!
|
|
#3
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Post Einstein Report Observation and a Question (not more of the same)
Both 180 and 25 used flashlights to help their drivers manually align their shooters.
|
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Post Einstein Report Observation and a Question (not more of the same)
So you had a flashlight shine at the retro-reflective tape, and from there your drivers could tell if they were aligned? Did you use a specific type of flashlight?
|
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Post Einstein Report Observation and a Question (not more of the same)
Quote:
SOURCE: Plenty of matches behind the glass against and with 25 |
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Post Einstein Report Observation and a Question (not more of the same)
Quote:
Quote:
![]() Last edited by Kristian Calhoun : 21-07-2012 at 11:38. |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Post Einstein Report Observation and a Question (not more of the same)
Quote:
|
|
#8
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Post Einstein Report Observation and a Question (not more of the same)
Quote:
Left and right alignment was obvious. The cool part was that the light was mounted at a fixed angle and aimed at the top goal. If the dot was too high, you drove forward; if the dot was too low, you drove back. Our shooter wheels only ran at one speed all year long! |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Post Einstein Report Observation and a Question (not more of the same)
Quote:
George, do you happen to know the model flashlight you used? Last edited by Andrew Lawrence : 21-07-2012 at 15:05. |
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Post Einstein Report Observation and a Question (not more of the same)
Yup 25 is a really BRIGHT group!
![]() I'll walk myself out. |
|
#11
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Post Einstein Report Observation and a Question (not more of the same)
Quote:
Our prototype entailed attaching the Photon Cannon (flashlight) to the robot with the Photon Cannon Mounting Device (a lot of duct tape). Just take any flashlight with a focus lens and tape it to your bot. If you like how it works, figure our how to mount it permanently and wire it to run off the robot battery instead of it's own batteries. Sounds like a nice little off-season project. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|