2012 IRI MATCH RESULTS AND STANDINGS

[stingray27]

Here is the OPR data for IRI if anyone is interested in looking at it. It is not adjusted for bridge balancing.

[Brandon Holley]

341s OPR was 11 points (!!) higher than the next highest. That is just ridonkulous.

-Brando

[qzrrbz]

Originally Posted by stingray27

Here is the OPR data for IRI if anyone is interested in looking at it. It is not adjusted for bridge balancing.

methinks the column labels for BP and TP may be swapped

[Ed Law]

Here are the OPR numbers including total, hybrid, bridge and teleop OPR.

OPR Rank/Team/OPR/OPR Hybrid/OPR Bridge/OPR Teleop
1	341	52.46	15.85	10.14	18.46
2	624	41.46	14.10	9.91	16.15
3	118	37.00	2.92	6.60	23.44
4	1023	36.84	8.30	10.66	11.37
5	2826	36.57	13.18	2.08	24.41
6	67	36.40	15.39	5.72	17.20
7	2056	34.26	12.73	7.56	17.51
8	233	33.98	7.88	5.24	22.92
9	469	33.97	3.13	4.65	23.59
10	51	33.80	5.29	10.45	16.84
11	68	33.00	12.51	4.30	9.13
12	2614	32.60	8.62	9.28	10.69
13	33	31.66	6.00	10.10	16.07
14	48	31.23	10.14	8.22	13.18
15	16	31.16	10.80	4.17	12.57
16	1676	30.72	9.35	5.87	16.47
17	2168	29.88	11.47	-1.05	8.35
18	548	29.79	9.43	9.93	11.04
19	1114	29.09	9.60	2.50	15.39
20	125	28.79	11.10	3.75	13.52
21	359	27.54	5.05	2.99	22.88
22	1741	26.97	8.94	7.06	7.65
23	1714	26.68	8.19	7.21	10.81
24	340	26.55	11.95	6.84	7.14
25	111	26.11	13.99	2.53	9.62
26	148	25.98	5.50	8.57	14.30
27	1640	25.74	9.67	5.76	7.46
28	3322	25.39	9.26	6.85	11.35
29	330	24.37	1.28	7.43	13.74
30	2590	23.89	7.17	2.41	14.07
31	192	23.38	5.50	1.32	9.42
32	2337	23.03	13.71	6.07	3.84
33	868	22.41	6.71	2.15	13.22
34	3947	21.38	8.92	6.36	8.84
35	1732	20.87	7.59	6.78	8.73
36	2194	20.04	4.29	5.26	7.30
37	234	20.03	9.86	3.93	6.91
38	573	19.91	4.99	6.49	11.93
39	3357	19.66	4.22	1.81	9.60
40	2949	19.58	6.34	5.49	8.42
41	3193	19.27	7.12	6.81	6.75
42	503	19.26	7.25	0.45	14.00
43	461	19.20	2.85	4.65	8.39
44	2834	19.16	7.60	6.13	1.79
45	2481	19.11	10.93	0.63	4.14
46	3940	18.77	7.95	6.06	1.81
47	973	18.77	7.22	6.92	4.49
48	447	18.67	3.70	-1.89	13.57
49	3138	17.80	6.60	3.53	9.80
50	71	17.13	5.48	1.72	3.15
51	1538	16.15	9.76	2.11	6.29
52	2054	15.78	7.04	3.04	6.37
53	45	14.67	7.20	7.00	3.60
54	27	14.11	2.07	3.42	10.23
55	4334	13.56	2.18	4.55	3.62
56	399	13.37	6.08	-0.32	7.32
57	829	13.08	2.10	-1.89	8.55
58	781	12.65	1.40	5.37	7.35
59	379	12.20	6.15	-2.11	8.62
60	3310	10.97	7.14	4.09	-2.50
61	245	10.58	6.33	0.51	4.13
62	217	9.73	6.88	0.54	2.14
63	1730	9.40	9.72	0.91	0.40
64	744	9.20	3.82	1.57	4.06
65	772	8.73	2.75	5.86	1.73
66	1592	8.10	2.00	-3.31	8.58
67	907	7.51	0.21	-2.47	10.07
68	292	3.19	3.54	-2.67	4.06
69	1902	1.37	3.63	-0.31	-1.24
70	1024	-0.43	0.71	-2.81	2.70

[AdamHeard]

Anyone know what matches had triples in them?

[Travis Hoffman]

Originally Posted by AdamHeard

Anyone know what matches had triples in them?

Here are the ones I recall off the top of my head.

3 triples were in matches involving 48 - Matches 28, 62, and 99.

Whether or not they were helpful or particularly entertaining for yours truly, I leave as an exercise for the reader to determine.

233 lost Match 75 to a triple after they were leading.

2826 lost Match 97 to a triple after they were leading.

340 tripled twice, one time with 341 and 447, in Match 72, defeating 469, 359, and 2337. I believe their other triple came during Match 101.

By the way, why did all the scouting geniuses picking for elims overlook 3940? They are peppered throughout these qualifying triple results.

[dodar]

1592 tripled twice but 1 was disallowed. Match 57 when we were with 1538, this was the disallowed triple, and match 103 when we were with 340 and 1023.

[bam-bam]

Originally Posted by Travis Hoffman

By the way, why did all the scouting geniuses picking for elims overlook 3940? They are peppered throughout these qualifying triple results.

They were also close to 4334's width, too. I am disappoint.

[stingray27]

In match 76, teams 27, 4334, and 2194 balanced even though they didn't need the triple balance.

[Clinton Bolinger]

This what our scouting database shows.

Triple Balances:
Match 01 - Red (341, 2834, 33)
Match 25 - Blue (2194, 829, 548)
Match 28 - Red (4334, 469, 48)
Match 29 - Blue (3357, 2834, 1023)
Match 56 - Red (341, 2614, 2481)
Match 61 - Both (3310, 341, 829 and 68, 118, 2590)
Match 62 - Red (16, 2834, 1114)
Match 65 - Red (3322, 1023, 125)
Match 72 - Red (340, 341, 447)
Match 74 - Blue (51, 3310, 67)
Match 75 - Blue (111, 3940, 3357)
Match 76 - Red (4334, 2194, 27)
Match 80 - Red (1640, 217, 1741)
Match 97 - Red (3940, 148, 2614)
*Match 99 - Blue (2481, 234, 461)
*Match 101 - Red (1592, 340, 1023)

* I dont have data for anything past match 97. Matches 99 and 101 are based on Travis post above.

Based on the data the top triple balance teams were:

341 = 4
2834 = 3

10 Teams = 2
21 Teams = 1

Hope this helps,
-Clinton-

[Ed Law]

Originally Posted by Clinton Bolinger

This what our scouting database shows.

Triple Balances:
Match 01 - Red (341, 2834, 33)
Match 25 - Blue (2194, 829, 548)
Match 28 - Red (4334, 469, 48)
Match 29 - Blue (3357, 2834, 1023)
Match 56 - Red (341, 2614, 2481)
Match 61 - Both (3310, 341, 829 and 68, 118, 2590)
Match 62 - Red (16, 2834, 1114)
Match 65 - Red (3322, 1023, 125)
Match 72 - Red (340, 341, 447)
Match 74 - Blue (51, 3310, 67)
Match 75 - Blue (111, 3940, 3357)
Match 76 - Red (4334, 2194, 27)
Match 80 - Red (1640, 217, 1741)
Match 97 - Red (3940, 148, 2614)
*Match 99 - Blue (2481, 234, 461)
*Match 101 - Red (1592, 340, 1023)

* I dont have data for anything past match 97. Matches 99 and 101 are based on Travis post above.

Based on the data the top triple balance teams were:

341 = 4
2834 = 3

10 Teams = 2
21 Teams = 1

Hope this helps,
-Clinton-

Thanks Clinton. This post made my day, to have our team number right below 341 in second place for most number of triple balance. We had a lucky schedule in terms of partners who are good in triple balance.

[AdamHeard]

Originally Posted by Travis Hoffman

3 triples were in matches involving 48 - Matches 28, 62, and 99.

Whether or not they were helpful or particularly entertaining for yours truly, I leave as an exercise for the reader to determine.

Based on your win-loss record, which matches you played that involved triples, and our scouting data the IRI rule changes had no effect on the fact that you didn't make eliminations. In other words, I think the fear/discussion going into the event was unnecessary.

[Travis Hoffman]

Originally Posted by AdamHeard

Based on your win-loss record, which matches you played that involved triples, and our scouting data the IRI rule changes had no effect on the fact that you didn't make eliminations. In other words, I think the fear/discussion going into the event was unnecessary.

[waialua359]

I dont get how our Hybrid points in the OPR data is so low.
We made every single hybrid shot except for 1 (1/2 in our match 7) that we chose to realign our robot without ever testing, to let both our partners use the spots we normally take.

I realize how OPR is calculated....just saying.

[Ed Law]

Originally Posted by waialua359

I dont get how our Hybrid points in the OPR data is so low.
We made every single hybrid shot except for 1 (1/2 in our match 7) that we chose to realign our robot without ever testing, to let both our partners use the spots we normally take.

I realize how OPR is calculated....just saying.

Glenn, I don't know why the number came out so low. I guess that is the limitation of OPR with 9 matches and 70 teams, meaning limited interaction among teams. I will double check the numbers when I have time later tonight. I was very busy at work the last two days catching up with work after taking two days off. I spent about two minutes to copy, paste and run the macro. I didn't really look at the numbers. Since the total OPR number matches what somebody else posted, I assume the subset OPR are correct also.