Go to Post Just remember, FIRST isn't about the robot, just have fun, meet new people, and try to learn something new. Killing yourself with inhumane amounts of pressure just isn't fun for anyone. - Ian W. [more]
Home
Go Back   Chief Delphi > ChiefDelphi.com Website > Extra Discussion
CD-Media   CD-Spy  
portal register members calendar search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read FAQ rules

 
 
 
Thread Tools Rating: Thread Rating: 2 votes, 5.00 average. Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #21   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 26-07-2012, 11:05
Rob Stehlik's Avatar
Rob Stehlik Rob Stehlik is offline
Registered User
FRC #0610 (Coyotes)
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Rookie Year: 2009
Location: Toronto
Posts: 101
Rob Stehlik is a glorious beacon of lightRob Stehlik is a glorious beacon of lightRob Stehlik is a glorious beacon of lightRob Stehlik is a glorious beacon of lightRob Stehlik is a glorious beacon of light
Re: pic: Snap Rings Or Shaft Collars?

Strictly speaking, there is a good reason not to use aluminum in shafts. As a material, aluminum doesn’t handle fatigue well.
From wikipedia: Fatigue occurs when a material is subjected to repeated loading and unloading. If the loads are above a certain threshold, microscopic cracks will begin to form at the surface. Eventually a crack will reach a critical size, and the structure will suddenly fracture.
Since shafts are rotating, they are almost always subject to fatigue. Actually, the lab test for fatigue involves a bending load applied to the end of a rotating shaft. As one would expect, the lower the stress on the material, the longer it lasts. And here is where materials differ: With steel, there is what is referred to as the “Endurance Limit” at which point the degradation of the material is so minimal, it will last indefinitely. With aluminum, there isn’t an endurance limit. Here’s a graph showing a typical fatigue response of steel and aluminum:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:S-N_curves.PNG
Notice that at a stress of 30 ksi, the curve for steel levels out, while aluminum continues down.
This being said, fatigue is not an exact science, but is based on lab tests and observation. The results offer guidelines for good design. Here is a great primer on fatigue:
http://www.epi-eng.com/mechanical_en..._in_metals.htm
Another important point about fatigue is that it begins at the surface. So grooves for snap rings act as stress risers, and are often the point of failure if they are in an area of high stress. I suspect that the original shaft in question failed due to bending. A cantilevered load on the end of the shaft would cause bending stress between the bearing supports, which is right where the snap ring groove is. Switching to a higher strength aluminum would make it last longer, but getting rid of the snap ring groove altogether would be an even better solution.
Obviously a lot of teams use aluminum shafts in FRC with great success, and our team has as well. If the stress is low, they will last long enough. Keep in mind that the average lifetime of an FRC robot is measured in hours. It’s a calculated risk. But in the real world, you would almost never see an aluminum shaft because of fatigue.

Last edited by Rob Stehlik : 26-07-2012 at 13:47.
Reply With Quote
 


Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 20:57.

The Chief Delphi Forums are sponsored by Innovation First International, Inc.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi