|
|
|
| Let's find ourselves a trailer and get hitched! |
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#16
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Local government ordinance hampers Beatty finances.
FIRST has sat by and watched Hall of Fame teams go dark for on reason or another and done nothing. There will be no bailout coming. Sadly 71 is on their own.
|
|
#17
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Local government ordinance hampers Beatty finances.
What other HoF teams have faced a similiar situation to this and not come out the other side?
|
|
#18
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Local government ordinance hampers Beatty finances.
Preliminary comparison of HoF vs TBA shows Team 22 (HoF 2001) not having played since 2006. I did not check to see if there were playing lapses in the other teams who did play this year.
Last edited by BigJ : 30-07-2012 at 14:39. |
|
#19
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Local government ordinance hampers Beatty finances.
Keep in mind that for some "Blow your mind" reason, 71 is not a HoF team. Thus their sorely missed absence from St Louis this year.
|
|
#20
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Local government ordinance hampers Beatty finances.
Lets also keep in mind that teams quit FRC for more reasons than just sponsorship. Some teams may decide to leave FRC for something they view as more challenging. Schools could pull their support, closing the team. The students in the school might not have enough interest in joining the team to keep the team alive.
IMO, sponsorship is the easiest one for FIRST to help a team solve, if the team really needs it and lets FIRST know they need help. As it stands, there are people around the country who spend enormous amounts of time helping find new sponsorship for teams. I know that's how my company (and then me) got involved with my team. That's also how a lot of teams in Minnesota get to Champs - through the work of those volunteers making phone calls starting the minute the team earns themselves a berth. When we made it to Champs in 2011, We knew where most of the funding for the trip was going to come from before we had even packed up the robot. I'm confident that a great team like this will be able to find alternate sources of funding for their team, and that they won't be afraid to ask their regional FIRST volunteers and staff for assistance if they really need it. |
|
#21
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Local government ordinance hampers Beatty finances.
I know, but I have always just called them a HoF team becuase they represent every quality of one. That and the fact that I think once you win atleast 3, in 71's case they have 4, world championships you deserve a HoF spot. People may disagree with my belief in that but we must remember that even though the main purpose for FIRST isnt the competition, but it is key in the minds of students who join and particiapte and the fact it is the one thing that can unite students by.
|
|
#22
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Local government ordinance hampers Beatty finances.
Quote:
I'm not saying they've handled it in the best way possible. (Actually, I really don't think they did.) Just that there's always more to the story. As far the 71 itself, not to mention the well-respected Beatty International, I hope they can put this all in context (whatever the correct context is) and pull through. We'll definitely miss this should-be HOF if they can't make it, but something tells me they will! |
|
#23
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Local government ordinance hampers Beatty finances.
It doesn't make a whole lot of sense to me that Beatty Mfg would drop all support of the team. I can see that the money could be going away, but why would their subsidiary closing have any effect on their ability to donate labor and engineering support? Perhaps the article isn't nuanced enough to make the distinction.
I hate to judge the situation without knowing all the facts, but it seems like the robotics team may have become the pawn in a political dispute. |
|
#24
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Local government ordinance hampers Beatty finances.
Quote:
|
|
#25
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Local government ordinance hampers Beatty finances.
We shall see and all we can do is hope that 71 continues in FRC through finding other financial resources. None of us know how much Beatty contributed to team 71 year to year financially. This happens to a lot of FRC team and it can still happen to yours.
Considering no one here lives in the city of Hammond it is hard to weigh in on what is going on there. It sounds like there are two distinct sides of this destroying small business but the scrapyard could be contributing to a large amount of theft/crime for people looking to make a quick dollar in this rough economy. Every decision has a good and bad side and unfortunately the bad side here hurts team 71. Good luck guys! |
|
#26
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Local government ordinance hampers Beatty finances.
Quote:
--- My guess to why there wasn't a reason to keep them alive at all costs is that they probably figure that if a team made the HoF, then they are probably able to find thier way out of the problem by whatever means. What often times gets teams into the HoF IS getting out of such jams. |
|
#27
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Local government ordinance hampers Beatty finances.
Quote:
23 took 10 years off. 22 left and became team 4. |
|
#28
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Local government ordinance hampers Beatty finances.
Quote:
The Midwest Regional (and all of FIRST) wouldn't be the same without 71. I'm not going to base conclusions off one article, but I hope they can find a way to compete next year. |
|
#29
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Local government ordinance hampers Beatty finances.
It would be more accurate to say that 22 split into 4 and 22 (both of which competed in 2006); after 2006, 22 did not return.
|
|
#30
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Local government ordinance hampers Beatty finances.
It seems to me that the company would have to pull their financial support of the team, that's how I read it anyway. 50-100k is a lot of capital for most companies, losing that income is pretty serious.
It's a tough lesson in diversifying team income sources. It is great to have one main sponsor that covers every expense, but it is not a risk-averse business model. As someone who works at a small company I am very glad that we have 2-3 major clients because it is very rare that all of them will be out of work for us. I have seen bigger companies disband, seemingly over night, if they lose work from their sole client. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|