|
Re: C++ vs. Java (speed considerations only)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Todd
I don't think the argument is that Java or Labview has less overhead than C++, rather that in (nearly all) applications that are relevant at all to FIRST, the overhead is simply irrelevant.
|
I agree. The overhead creates milliseconds of delay; it's insignificant compared to the sensor delay. But I was answering in terms of pure Java vs C++. I don't want people to think what's relevant to robotics is always relevant to general programming.
__________________
Do not say what can or cannot be done, but, instead, say what must be done for the task at hand must be accomplished.
|
Nominate your mentor for WFA, it's the best way to say 'Thank You'. - Brandon Martus [more] 
12-08-2012, 07:51
Threaded Mode