Go to Post Lose a year of bumper making and everyone's a rookie again. - mrnoble [more]
Home
Go Back   Chief Delphi > Technical > Pneumatics
CD-Media   CD-Spy  
portal register members calendar search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read FAQ rules

 
Closed Thread
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 13-08-2012, 12:44
David Doerr's Avatar
David Doerr David Doerr is offline
Registered User
FRC #4478 (Materia Oscura)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Rookie Year: 2002
Location: Milford, Michigan, USA
Posts: 75
David Doerr has much to be proud ofDavid Doerr has much to be proud ofDavid Doerr has much to be proud ofDavid Doerr has much to be proud ofDavid Doerr has much to be proud ofDavid Doerr has much to be proud ofDavid Doerr has much to be proud ofDavid Doerr has much to be proud of
Seeking SMC Pneumatics Advice

I'm hoping for advice from SMC users. We've never used pneumatics and are looking to purchase SMC valves and a manifold.

I'm leaning towards purchasing the SY3000 body ported valves (SY3120 and SY3220) and manifold with the "M" connector option because the manifold is smaller and lighter than the base mount manifold and the tubes and wires will protrude from the top of the assembly rather than the sides. I'm thinking that connections at the top of the assembly will be easier to access than ones from the side. I'm thinking how much easier it is to package and access connections to the cRIO in contrast to the Power Distribution module for example.

However, other CD posts I've seen refer to the base mounted style (SY3140 and SY3240).

What has your experience been and why would you prefer one style over the other?

Thanks!
  #2   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 13-08-2012, 14:25
FrankJ's Avatar
FrankJ FrankJ is offline
Robot Mentor
FRC #2974 (WALT)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Rookie Year: 2009
Location: Marietta GA
Posts: 1,946
FrankJ has a reputation beyond reputeFrankJ has a reputation beyond reputeFrankJ has a reputation beyond reputeFrankJ has a reputation beyond reputeFrankJ has a reputation beyond reputeFrankJ has a reputation beyond reputeFrankJ has a reputation beyond reputeFrankJ has a reputation beyond reputeFrankJ has a reputation beyond reputeFrankJ has a reputation beyond reputeFrankJ has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Seeking SMC Pneumatics Advice

Realize the rules for 2013 may not be the same for 2012....

The way the pneumatic rules are written with an odd Cv value & ports size restrictions makes it easier to conform to the rules while having maximum flow through the valve using by individual valves rather than a manifold. The robot inspectors are used to seeing individual valves. I try to make their job easy.
  #3   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 13-08-2012, 15:08
Andrew Bates's Avatar
Andrew Bates Andrew Bates is offline
Registered User
AKA: Bates
FRC #0125 (NUTRONS)
Team Role: Mechanical
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Rookie Year: 2004
Location: Ypsilanti, Michigan/Boston, MA
Posts: 332
Andrew Bates has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew Bates has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew Bates has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew Bates has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew Bates has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew Bates has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew Bates has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew Bates has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew Bates has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew Bates has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew Bates has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Seeking SMC Pneumatics Advice

We've used manifolds for two years now. It does simplify the plumbing of the robot and a single manifold for several valves is much more compact than each valve having it's own manifold.

In 2011 we used a 5 port manifold with Base-mounted valves. This means air was supplied in one end of the manifold and was directed out a port on the side of the manifold below each valve.

In 2012 we used a 5 port manifold with Body-ported valves. This means air was supplied in one end of the manifold and was directed out the top of each valve.

Both configurations save space over what you would normally end up with each valve having it's own manifold. Both configurations also save some weight. Depending on where you plan on placing your manifold one configuration might work better than the other.

For 2012 our valves were from the SY3120 series. In 2011 we used SY3140 series.

Manifolds are perfectly legal for use in FRC per the last couple of years rules. YES you do have to work harder to find the proper cV value for your valve/manifold combination. YES you do need to have proper documentation proving they are legal. Inspectors have never had any trouble with manifolds in my experience and we've never even had to pull the specifications up.
__________________
ME Student at Northeastern University, Captain of the NUTRONs #125 FRC

Former member of VEXELLENT and Cranbrook Robotics
  #4   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 13-08-2012, 17:33
R.C.'s Avatar
R.C. R.C. is online now
2017... Oooh Kill em, Swerve!
AKA: Owner, WestCoast Products
FRC #1323 (MadTown Robotics)
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Rookie Year: 2006
Location: Madera, CA
Posts: 2,188
R.C. has a reputation beyond reputeR.C. has a reputation beyond reputeR.C. has a reputation beyond reputeR.C. has a reputation beyond reputeR.C. has a reputation beyond reputeR.C. has a reputation beyond reputeR.C. has a reputation beyond reputeR.C. has a reputation beyond reputeR.C. has a reputation beyond reputeR.C. has a reputation beyond reputeR.C. has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Seeking SMC Pneumatics Advice

Here is a paper from Adam:

http://www.chiefdelphi.com/media/papers/2414

Its what 973/1323/1477 have used. A lot of other teams probably have as well.

-RC
__________________
R.C.
Owner, WestCoast Products || Twitter
MadTown Robotics Team 1323
  #5   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 14-08-2012, 11:08
David Doerr's Avatar
David Doerr David Doerr is offline
Registered User
FRC #4478 (Materia Oscura)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Rookie Year: 2002
Location: Milford, Michigan, USA
Posts: 75
David Doerr has much to be proud ofDavid Doerr has much to be proud ofDavid Doerr has much to be proud ofDavid Doerr has much to be proud ofDavid Doerr has much to be proud ofDavid Doerr has much to be proud ofDavid Doerr has much to be proud ofDavid Doerr has much to be proud of
Re: Seeking SMC Pneumatics Advice

Quote:
Originally Posted by FrankJ View Post
... odd Cv value & ports size restrictions ... I try to make their job easy.
Yes, I find making the inspector's job easy makes my job easy.

A question about the 2012 port size rule (R71):
Quote:
...maximum 1/8 in. NPT port diameter...
What does that port size specification mean? The KOP supplied valve had M7 ports, not 1/8 NPT ports. Is a 1/8 NPT port bigger than an M7 port?

Would a valve with 1/4" push-to-connect ports be legal? (1/4" push-to-connect fittings work with the KOP-supplied 1/4" tubing.)

...or would we have to purchase valves with 1/8" NPT ports and then add 1/8" NPT to 1/4" push-to-connect fittings to be legal?

An installation would be a lot cleaner if the valves already had 1/4" push-to-connect ports since those interface directly with the required tubing.

Last edited by David Doerr : 14-08-2012 at 11:11. Reason: change "fittings" to "ports" for clarity
  #6   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 14-08-2012, 12:10
Dale's Avatar
Dale Dale is offline
Head Coach & Mentor
AKA: Dale Yocum
FRC #1540 (Flaming Chickens)
Team Role: Coach
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Rookie Year: 2005
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 504
Dale has much to be proud ofDale has much to be proud ofDale has much to be proud ofDale has much to be proud ofDale has much to be proud ofDale has much to be proud ofDale has much to be proud ofDale has much to be proud ofDale has much to be proud of
Re: Seeking SMC Pneumatics Advice

For what it's worth, we've used the SMC manifolds for years and if you have a LOT of valves they can make sense. I doubt they are lighter, though. The 4 and 8 valve manifolds are milled out of a solid block of aluminum and are pretty hefty.

Last year we only had three valves on our robot so I got the SY3240-6LO and SY3140-6LO valves that are body ported. The kids liked them a lot better. There are fewer fiddly little parts to mess with and they mount easily. I like them because they are easier for the new members to understand and are easier to re-purpose after the competition season.

The big lesson I've learned is that these little valves are delicate, expensive little watch-like devices. Don't make the same mistake we did and store them in a box with the rest of your pneumatic junk. We've lost more valves to getting knocked around in that box than any other source.

I've never known an inspector to care about 1/8" NPT fitting rule as long as you can show that the valve meets FIRST specs and you don't have valves with giant fittings (which probably means they don't meet FIRST specs anyway.) After all some valves don't even have threads, the fitting is integral with the valve. Your mileage may vary.
__________________
2016 PNW Championship Chairman's; 2016 Winner Oregon City District, 2015 PNW Championship Chairman's; 2015 PNW District Engineering Inspiration; 2015 PNW District Finalist; 2014 PNW Championship Chairman's; 2014 Championship Innovation in Controls; 2013 Chairman's (Oregon); 2013 Finalist (OKC); 2012 Winner (OKC); 2012 Chairman's (OKC); 2012 Woody Flowers (Oregon); 2011 Volunteer of the Year (Oregon); 2011 Finalist & Captain (San Diego); 2011 Innovation in Control (San Diego); 2010 & 2007 Chairman's (Oregon); 2010 Regional Champions (Colorado); 2010 Innovation in Control (Colorado); 2009 & 2008 Engineering Inspiration (Oregon); 2008 Regional Champions (Oregon); 2007 Regional Finalist (Oregon); 2005 Rookie Inspiration (PNW)

Last edited by Dale : 14-08-2012 at 16:00.
  #7   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 14-08-2012, 15:08
Andrew Bates's Avatar
Andrew Bates Andrew Bates is offline
Registered User
AKA: Bates
FRC #0125 (NUTRONS)
Team Role: Mechanical
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Rookie Year: 2004
Location: Ypsilanti, Michigan/Boston, MA
Posts: 332
Andrew Bates has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew Bates has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew Bates has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew Bates has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew Bates has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew Bates has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew Bates has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew Bates has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew Bates has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew Bates has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew Bates has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Seeking SMC Pneumatics Advice

Quote:
Originally Posted by David Doerr View Post
A question about the 2012 port size rule (R71):

What does that port size specification mean? The KOP supplied valve had M7 ports, not 1/8 NPT ports. Is a 1/8 NPT port bigger than an M7 port?

Would a valve with 1/4" push-to-connect ports be legal? (1/4" push-to-connect fittings work with the KOP-supplied 1/4" tubing.)

...or would we have to purchase valves with 1/8" NPT ports and then add 1/8" NPT to 1/4" push-to-connect fittings to be legal?

An installation would be a lot cleaner if the valves already had 1/4" push-to-connect ports since those interface directly with the required tubing.
The 1/4" push-to-connect fittings is a different thing from the 1/8" port size. The 1/4" push-to-connect fitting is how you are actually going to connect to the valve or manifold. The 1/8" port size describes the size port that the fitting fits into. To be frank, this isn't clearly laid out anywhere that I've found, this is simply my understanding of the valves after working with them for many years.
__________________
ME Student at Northeastern University, Captain of the NUTRONs #125 FRC

Former member of VEXELLENT and Cranbrook Robotics
  #8   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 14-08-2012, 15:16
FrankJ's Avatar
FrankJ FrankJ is offline
Robot Mentor
FRC #2974 (WALT)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Rookie Year: 2009
Location: Marietta GA
Posts: 1,946
FrankJ has a reputation beyond reputeFrankJ has a reputation beyond reputeFrankJ has a reputation beyond reputeFrankJ has a reputation beyond reputeFrankJ has a reputation beyond reputeFrankJ has a reputation beyond reputeFrankJ has a reputation beyond reputeFrankJ has a reputation beyond reputeFrankJ has a reputation beyond reputeFrankJ has a reputation beyond reputeFrankJ has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Seeking SMC Pneumatics Advice

I am glad to hear inspectors are generally reasonable about these things. The problem comes when an inspector hangs on the letter of the rule. I seen it happen with other rules...

Please do not taken this as inspector bashing. They are volunteers trying to the best they can. I have found them to be generally reasonable and always professional.
  #9   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 14-08-2012, 17:30
IndySam's Avatar
IndySam IndySam is online now
Registered User
FRC #0829 (Digital Goats)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Rookie Year: 2004
Location: Indy
Posts: 3,362
IndySam has a reputation beyond reputeIndySam has a reputation beyond reputeIndySam has a reputation beyond reputeIndySam has a reputation beyond reputeIndySam has a reputation beyond reputeIndySam has a reputation beyond reputeIndySam has a reputation beyond reputeIndySam has a reputation beyond reputeIndySam has a reputation beyond reputeIndySam has a reputation beyond reputeIndySam has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Seeking SMC Pneumatics Advice

We don't use the manifold mounted valves because we always want to mount the valves as close as possible to the cylinder they are connected too. This is so we save as much air as possible.

You loose all the air in the hose running to the cylinder from the valve and this can amount to a significant amount of air. We want to have our compressor run as little as possible.

I really wish FIRST would dump the whole CV thing, try and find the actual CV rating of a valve?
__________________
"Champions are champions not because they do anything extraordinary but because they do the ordinary things better than anyone else." —Chuck Knoll


2015 Indianapolis District Winner
2014 Boilermaker Regional Industrial Design Award
2013 Smoky Mountain Regional Industrial Design Award
2012 Boilermaker Engineering Excellence Award
2010 Boilermaker Rockwell Innovation in Control Award.
2009 Buckeye J&J Gracious Professionalism Award
2009 Boilermaker J&J Gracious Professionalism Award
2008 Boilermaker J&J Gracious Professionalism Award
2007 St Louis Regional Winners
  #10   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 15-08-2012, 21:10
Unsung FIRST Hero Woodie Flowers Award
Chris Fultz Chris Fultz is offline
My Other Car is a 500 HP Turbine
FRC #0234 (Cyber Blue)
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Rookie Year: 1942
Location: Indianapolis, IN
Posts: 2,837
Chris Fultz has a reputation beyond reputeChris Fultz has a reputation beyond reputeChris Fultz has a reputation beyond reputeChris Fultz has a reputation beyond reputeChris Fultz has a reputation beyond reputeChris Fultz has a reputation beyond reputeChris Fultz has a reputation beyond reputeChris Fultz has a reputation beyond reputeChris Fultz has a reputation beyond reputeChris Fultz has a reputation beyond reputeChris Fultz has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Seeking SMC Pneumatics Advice

We have used manifolds the last two years (5 port). They make plumbing and wiring much simpler. One inlet to the manifold, one mounting location, wires all to one place.

Our only challenge is that some of the manifolds are tough to mount fittings side by side on. We use short extension fittings for every other port.

The Cv rating is for the valve itself, not the manifold or other base.
__________________
Chris Fultz
Cyber Blue - Team 234
2016 IRI Planning Committee
2016 IndyRAGE Planning Committee
2010 - Woodie Flowers Award - Championship
  #11   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 15-08-2012, 21:33
IndySam's Avatar
IndySam IndySam is online now
Registered User
FRC #0829 (Digital Goats)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Rookie Year: 2004
Location: Indy
Posts: 3,362
IndySam has a reputation beyond reputeIndySam has a reputation beyond reputeIndySam has a reputation beyond reputeIndySam has a reputation beyond reputeIndySam has a reputation beyond reputeIndySam has a reputation beyond reputeIndySam has a reputation beyond reputeIndySam has a reputation beyond reputeIndySam has a reputation beyond reputeIndySam has a reputation beyond reputeIndySam has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Seeking SMC Pneumatics Advice

I understand how the wiring is easier but I don't understand how the plumbing is.

When we mount the valve close to the cylinder we only have to run one hose up to that area instead of two. To me this is simpler, cleaner and uses much less air. But to each his own

Cv will vary according to the pressure used and even temperature, it must be calculated for every given situation. It is a poor value to use for our purposes.
__________________
"Champions are champions not because they do anything extraordinary but because they do the ordinary things better than anyone else." —Chuck Knoll


2015 Indianapolis District Winner
2014 Boilermaker Regional Industrial Design Award
2013 Smoky Mountain Regional Industrial Design Award
2012 Boilermaker Engineering Excellence Award
2010 Boilermaker Rockwell Innovation in Control Award.
2009 Buckeye J&J Gracious Professionalism Award
2009 Boilermaker J&J Gracious Professionalism Award
2008 Boilermaker J&J Gracious Professionalism Award
2007 St Louis Regional Winners
  #12   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 15-08-2012, 22:17
R.C.'s Avatar
R.C. R.C. is online now
2017... Oooh Kill em, Swerve!
AKA: Owner, WestCoast Products
FRC #1323 (MadTown Robotics)
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Rookie Year: 2006
Location: Madera, CA
Posts: 2,188
R.C. has a reputation beyond reputeR.C. has a reputation beyond reputeR.C. has a reputation beyond reputeR.C. has a reputation beyond reputeR.C. has a reputation beyond reputeR.C. has a reputation beyond reputeR.C. has a reputation beyond reputeR.C. has a reputation beyond reputeR.C. has a reputation beyond reputeR.C. has a reputation beyond reputeR.C. has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Seeking SMC Pneumatics Advice

Quote:
Originally Posted by IndySam View Post
I understand how the wiring is easier but I don't understand how the plumbing is.

When we mount the valve close to the cylinder we only have to run one hose up to that area instead of two. To me this is simpler, cleaner and uses much less air. But to each his own
The reason a lot of say the manifold is better is because:

-One Central Spot for wiring
-One Central Spot for turning off and on solenoids manually.
-One airline to power all x amount of solenoids, this year we used 6. So it reduced the amount of air by 5 lines.
-Its not messy, as I don't have to deal with solenoids in 6 or more spots.
-Also you can blank off spots your not using for around $2-4 bucks and add solenoids super easy. This year we thought we were using 6 solenoids, so we bought the 8 guy.

Overall we really like the SMC Manifold.

-RC
__________________
R.C.
Owner, WestCoast Products || Twitter
MadTown Robotics Team 1323
  #13   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 15-08-2012, 22:20
AdamHeard's Avatar
AdamHeard AdamHeard is offline
Lead Mentor
FRC #0973 (Greybots)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Rookie Year: 2004
Location: Atascadero
Posts: 5,526
AdamHeard has a reputation beyond reputeAdamHeard has a reputation beyond reputeAdamHeard has a reputation beyond reputeAdamHeard has a reputation beyond reputeAdamHeard has a reputation beyond reputeAdamHeard has a reputation beyond reputeAdamHeard has a reputation beyond reputeAdamHeard has a reputation beyond reputeAdamHeard has a reputation beyond reputeAdamHeard has a reputation beyond reputeAdamHeard has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to AdamHeard
Re: Seeking SMC Pneumatics Advice

Quote:
Originally Posted by IndySam View Post
I understand how the wiring is easier but I don't understand how the plumbing is.

When we mount the valve close to the cylinder we only have to run one hose up to that area instead of two. To me this is simpler, cleaner and uses much less air. But to each his own

Cv will vary according to the pressure used and even temperature, it must be calculated for every given situation. It is a poor value to use for our purposes.
Sounds like an agree to disagree case.

The common manifold requires longer runs to cylinders, but it has less fittings overall as there is a single input for all solenoids; that combined with the fact that an N-port manifold is far less space used than N single solenoids makes the layout a lot cleaner for most robots.
  #14   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 15-08-2012, 22:37
IndySam's Avatar
IndySam IndySam is online now
Registered User
FRC #0829 (Digital Goats)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Rookie Year: 2004
Location: Indy
Posts: 3,362
IndySam has a reputation beyond reputeIndySam has a reputation beyond reputeIndySam has a reputation beyond reputeIndySam has a reputation beyond reputeIndySam has a reputation beyond reputeIndySam has a reputation beyond reputeIndySam has a reputation beyond reputeIndySam has a reputation beyond reputeIndySam has a reputation beyond reputeIndySam has a reputation beyond reputeIndySam has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Seeking SMC Pneumatics Advice

Quote:
Originally Posted by R.C. View Post
The reason a lot of say the manifold is better is because:

-One Central Spot for wiring Absolutly
-One Central Spot for turning off and on solenoids manually. True, but not nessasaraly an advantage, it's easy for me to know which solenoid powers which cylinder because it's mounted near it or even on it
-One airline to power all x amount of solenoids, this year we used 6. So it reduced the amount of air by 5 lines. remote mounted solenoids use much less hose, generally
-Its not messy, as I don't have to deal with solenoids in 6 or more spots. true but there is more mess created by running twice as many hoses
-Also you can blank off spots your not using for around $2-4 bucks and add solenoids super easy. This year we thought we were using 6 solenoids, so we bought the 8 guy adding solenoids is a also a piece of cake with remote mounted valves.

Overall we really like the SMC Manifold.

-RC
The simple fact that I will use much less air by mounting remotely is enough reason for me to use remote mounted solenoids. Energy consumption is very important.
__________________
"Champions are champions not because they do anything extraordinary but because they do the ordinary things better than anyone else." —Chuck Knoll


2015 Indianapolis District Winner
2014 Boilermaker Regional Industrial Design Award
2013 Smoky Mountain Regional Industrial Design Award
2012 Boilermaker Engineering Excellence Award
2010 Boilermaker Rockwell Innovation in Control Award.
2009 Buckeye J&J Gracious Professionalism Award
2009 Boilermaker J&J Gracious Professionalism Award
2008 Boilermaker J&J Gracious Professionalism Award
2007 St Louis Regional Winners
  #15   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 15-08-2012, 23:16
R.C.'s Avatar
R.C. R.C. is online now
2017... Oooh Kill em, Swerve!
AKA: Owner, WestCoast Products
FRC #1323 (MadTown Robotics)
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Rookie Year: 2006
Location: Madera, CA
Posts: 2,188
R.C. has a reputation beyond reputeR.C. has a reputation beyond reputeR.C. has a reputation beyond reputeR.C. has a reputation beyond reputeR.C. has a reputation beyond reputeR.C. has a reputation beyond reputeR.C. has a reputation beyond reputeR.C. has a reputation beyond reputeR.C. has a reputation beyond reputeR.C. has a reputation beyond reputeR.C. has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Seeking SMC Pneumatics Advice

Quote:
Originally Posted by IndySam View Post
The simple fact that I will use much less air by mounting remotely is enough reason for me to use remote mounted solenoids. Energy consumption is very important.
I guess this is a case to agree to disagree. We've done both and like the manifold.

-RC
__________________
R.C.
Owner, WestCoast Products || Twitter
MadTown Robotics Team 1323
Closed Thread


Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 22:21.

The Chief Delphi Forums are sponsored by Innovation First International, Inc.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi