Go to Post Don't give up on others. I believe in killing grumps with a smile! - maltz1881 [more]
Home
Go Back   Chief Delphi > FIRST > General Forum
CD-Media   CD-Spy  
portal register members calendar search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read FAQ rules

 
Closed Thread
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #106   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 22-08-2012, 12:26
Unsung FIRST Hero
Al Skierkiewicz Al Skierkiewicz is offline
Broadcast Eng/Chief Robot Inspector
AKA: Big Al WFFA 2005
FRC #0111 (WildStang)
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Rookie Year: 1996
Location: Wheeling, IL
Posts: 10,798
Al Skierkiewicz has a reputation beyond reputeAl Skierkiewicz has a reputation beyond reputeAl Skierkiewicz has a reputation beyond reputeAl Skierkiewicz has a reputation beyond reputeAl Skierkiewicz has a reputation beyond reputeAl Skierkiewicz has a reputation beyond reputeAl Skierkiewicz has a reputation beyond reputeAl Skierkiewicz has a reputation beyond reputeAl Skierkiewicz has a reputation beyond reputeAl Skierkiewicz has a reputation beyond reputeAl Skierkiewicz has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Team 548 Einstein Statement

Quote:
Originally Posted by Siri View Post
What I find significantly less plausible is that FIRST officials happened to do so. Not only is the sample size many, many times smaller, but they are naturally quite busy during matches and additionally have every reason to trust in FIRST's testing. (I acknowledge the potential for complacency.) I cannot picture an FTA or FTAA (etc), much less Dean or Woodie, whipping out their phone in the middle of a match. They have every reason to be among the most busy people in the stadium and no reason to distrust their own selections. This is my argument against DampRobot's question of institutional knowledge.
HUH?????
__________________
Good Luck All. Learn something new, everyday!
Al
WB9UVJ
www.wildstang.org
________________________
Storming the Tower since 1996.
  #107   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 22-08-2012, 12:38
Astrokid248's Avatar
Astrokid248 Astrokid248 is offline
The scariest person in FIRST
AKA: Aviana Knochel, a.k.a. WIG GIRL
FRC #0118 (The Robonauts)
Team Role: Alumni
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Rookie Year: 2008
Location: Houston
Posts: 137
Astrokid248 has a reputation beyond reputeAstrokid248 has a reputation beyond reputeAstrokid248 has a reputation beyond reputeAstrokid248 has a reputation beyond reputeAstrokid248 has a reputation beyond reputeAstrokid248 has a reputation beyond reputeAstrokid248 has a reputation beyond reputeAstrokid248 has a reputation beyond reputeAstrokid248 has a reputation beyond reputeAstrokid248 has a reputation beyond reputeAstrokid248 has a reputation beyond repute
Quote:
Originally Posted by Siri View Post
What I find significantly less plausible is that FIRST officials happened to do so. Not only is the sample size many, many times smaller, but they are naturally quite busy during matches and additionally have every reason to trust in FIRST's testing. (I acknowledge the potential for complacency.) I cannot picture an FTA or FTAA (etc), much less Dean or Woodie, whipping out their phone in the middle of a match. They have every reason to be among the most busy people in the stadium and no reason to distrust their own selections. This is my argument against DampRobot's question of institutional knowledge.
Should've clarified a bit. I'm not at all surprised FIRST didn't find it. There is no scenario in which they could've found the issue before Einstien. I'm saying that a) if they implement some sort of a feedback system, maybe the troubleshooting will be more comprehensive and b) the mystery mentor probably isn't the only guy who was aware of the problem before he tried to alert the FTAs. Just my 2¢.
__________________
Conner: "You're short."
Me: "So what?"
Conner: "We're gonna put you inside the robot and let you kick everything."
Me: * facepalm *
-----------------
  #108   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 22-08-2012, 13:09
Siri's Avatar
Siri Siri is offline
Dare greatly
AKA: 1640 coach 2010-2014
FRC #2641 (PCCR; Refs & RIs)
Team Role: Coach
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Rookie Year: 2007
Location: PA
Posts: 1,639
Siri has a reputation beyond reputeSiri has a reputation beyond reputeSiri has a reputation beyond reputeSiri has a reputation beyond reputeSiri has a reputation beyond reputeSiri has a reputation beyond reputeSiri has a reputation beyond reputeSiri has a reputation beyond reputeSiri has a reputation beyond reputeSiri has a reputation beyond reputeSiri has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via ICQ to Siri
Re: Team 548 Einstein Statement

Quote:
Originally Posted by Al Skierkiewicz View Post
HUH?????
uh oh. What'd I do, Al?


Quote:
Originally Posted by Astrokid248 View Post
Should've clarified a bit. I'm not at all surprised FIRST didn't find it. There is no scenario in which they could've found the issue before Einstien. I'm saying that a) if they implement some sort of a feedback system, maybe the troubleshooting will be more comprehensive and b) the mystery mentor probably isn't the only guy who was aware of the problem before he tried to alert the FTAs. Just my 2¢.
Oh. Yeah, then we totally agree with each other. (Does that make it 4¢?)
__________________
  #109   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 22-08-2012, 13:15
Unsung FIRST Hero
Al Skierkiewicz Al Skierkiewicz is offline
Broadcast Eng/Chief Robot Inspector
AKA: Big Al WFFA 2005
FRC #0111 (WildStang)
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Rookie Year: 1996
Location: Wheeling, IL
Posts: 10,798
Al Skierkiewicz has a reputation beyond reputeAl Skierkiewicz has a reputation beyond reputeAl Skierkiewicz has a reputation beyond reputeAl Skierkiewicz has a reputation beyond reputeAl Skierkiewicz has a reputation beyond reputeAl Skierkiewicz has a reputation beyond reputeAl Skierkiewicz has a reputation beyond reputeAl Skierkiewicz has a reputation beyond reputeAl Skierkiewicz has a reputation beyond reputeAl Skierkiewicz has a reputation beyond reputeAl Skierkiewicz has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Team 548 Einstein Statement

I am trying to figure what you are saying in that post.
__________________
Good Luck All. Learn something new, everyday!
Al
WB9UVJ
www.wildstang.org
________________________
Storming the Tower since 1996.
  #110   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 22-08-2012, 13:27
Jon Stratis's Avatar
Jon Stratis Jon Stratis is offline
Mentor, LRI, MN RPC
FRC #2177 (The Robettes)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Rookie Year: 2006
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 3,827
Jon Stratis has a reputation beyond reputeJon Stratis has a reputation beyond reputeJon Stratis has a reputation beyond reputeJon Stratis has a reputation beyond reputeJon Stratis has a reputation beyond reputeJon Stratis has a reputation beyond reputeJon Stratis has a reputation beyond reputeJon Stratis has a reputation beyond reputeJon Stratis has a reputation beyond reputeJon Stratis has a reputation beyond reputeJon Stratis has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Team 548 Einstein Statement

Al, I think his point was that the likelihood of FIRST officials stumbling onto the FCA issue prior to Einstein was extremely small. The FIRST officials who would be most likely to recognize it for what it is (like the FTA's) are too busy during competition and matches to be flipping through their phones, so accidentally stumbling on it would be difficult for them.

I would add one more item... those individuals are probably the last ones who would actually "try" to connect to the field if the option pops up on their phone. They would just cancel out of the option and go about their business.
__________________
2007 - Present: Mentor, 2177 The Robettes
LRI: North Star 2012-2016; Lake Superior 2013-2014; MN State Tournament 2013-2014, 2016; Galileo 2016; Iowa 2017
2015: North Star Regional Volunteer of the Year
2016: Lake Superior WFFA
  #111   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 22-08-2012, 14:00
JesseK's Avatar
JesseK JesseK is offline
Expert Flybot Crasher
FRC #1885 (ILITE)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Rookie Year: 2005
Location: Reston, VA
Posts: 3,712
JesseK has a reputation beyond reputeJesseK has a reputation beyond reputeJesseK has a reputation beyond reputeJesseK has a reputation beyond reputeJesseK has a reputation beyond reputeJesseK has a reputation beyond reputeJesseK has a reputation beyond reputeJesseK has a reputation beyond reputeJesseK has a reputation beyond reputeJesseK has a reputation beyond reputeJesseK has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Team 548 Einstein Statement

Quote:
Originally Posted by techhelpbb View Post
Also there are probably more devices than one might realize at any one event that can use 5GHz because they are not line of sight to the field. Consider all the driver's station laptops in the pits. I'll assume that no one on the field with a 5GHz laptop has time to be doing anything but what is expected of them.
The assumption is a bit naive.

While I agree that 5Ghz wireless cards on battery-powered mission-critical laptops are far and few between (energy mongers...), any individual that tries to interfere from a driver's station laptop will probably not rely on a driver to do so. It's conceivable that the drive team wouldn't know it's happening. Most likely it'd go in a batch file or background script (rundll32.exe anyone?) that doesn't show up. Additionally, it could happen from the queue rather than on the field.

Now that an exploit is public knowledge, it's only a matter of creativity for how it's attempted to be abused. FIRST needs to find a solution for the root cause (sounds like they are). Turning wireless off for the laptops is a start.
__________________

Drive Coach, 1885 (2007-present)
CAD Library Updated 5/1/16 - 2016 Curie/Carver Industrial Design Winner
GitHub
  #112   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 22-08-2012, 14:19
techhelpbb's Avatar
techhelpbb techhelpbb is offline
Registered User
FRC #0011 (MORT - Team 11)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Rookie Year: 1997
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 1,624
techhelpbb has a reputation beyond reputetechhelpbb has a reputation beyond reputetechhelpbb has a reputation beyond reputetechhelpbb has a reputation beyond reputetechhelpbb has a reputation beyond reputetechhelpbb has a reputation beyond reputetechhelpbb has a reputation beyond reputetechhelpbb has a reputation beyond reputetechhelpbb has a reputation beyond reputetechhelpbb has a reputation beyond reputetechhelpbb has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Team 548 Einstein Statement

Quote:
Originally Posted by JesseK View Post
The assumption is a bit naive.

While I agree that 5Ghz wireless cards on battery-powered mission-critical laptops are far and few between (energy mongers...), any individual that tries to interfere from a driver's station laptop will probably not rely on a driver to do so. It's conceivable that the drive team wouldn't know it's happening. Most likely it'd go in a batch file or background script (rundll32.exe anyone?) that doesn't show up. Additionally, it could happen from the queue rather than on the field.

Now that an exploit is public knowledge, it's only a matter of creativity for how it's attempted to be abused. FIRST needs to find a solution for the root cause (sounds like they are). Turning wireless off for the laptops is a start.
It's hard to really enforce the zone around a field by just policing devices that are off.

You can't jam because if you do you probably will jam yourself unless you use a very well designed jamming system. Plus FIRST is a publicly visible corporation and you're taking your legal chances jamming like that. You can't count on the devices staying off after you look at them (if we assume no trust it's no problem to just turn it on or for an attacker to use resource kit tools to turn it back on). You can't even count on a spectrum analyzer and a near field antenna to find the devices because a device could be disabled when you look. You can't rely on denial of service detection because wireless by it's very nature is prone to short service disruptions which makes any channel disruptions less than a complete denial of service harder to detect. You can't even sort the process with a Bayesian filter because there are layers of complication and that requires some amount of repetition.

So in reality your choices to prevent future issues get quickly more difficult.

One could track communications losses per match and replay those that don't seem to be due to power issues to the radio (assuming we consider power issues to the radio to be a build quality issue). However, that does not fit with the current process that seems to be at work. Given the current process if an interloper can interfere and not get caught the match outcomes stand. So all it takes is someone with the knowledge and the willingness to absorb the risk.

Stick your head in on a DEFCON or Black Hat convention discussion some time. They'll pull stunts that obviously are pushing or breaking the law right in front of the authorities they know are watching them in the very same room. They aren't shy about it. It's going to be really hard to deny what they were doing if they get busted with a video of them doing it with an audience. At least they aren't concealing their efforts with what they know.

Last edited by techhelpbb : 22-08-2012 at 14:35.
  #113   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 22-08-2012, 14:37
Jon Stratis's Avatar
Jon Stratis Jon Stratis is offline
Mentor, LRI, MN RPC
FRC #2177 (The Robettes)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Rookie Year: 2006
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 3,827
Jon Stratis has a reputation beyond reputeJon Stratis has a reputation beyond reputeJon Stratis has a reputation beyond reputeJon Stratis has a reputation beyond reputeJon Stratis has a reputation beyond reputeJon Stratis has a reputation beyond reputeJon Stratis has a reputation beyond reputeJon Stratis has a reputation beyond reputeJon Stratis has a reputation beyond reputeJon Stratis has a reputation beyond reputeJon Stratis has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Team 548 Einstein Statement

There are simply too many ways for a robot to fail (as we saw in the Einstein report) for the refs for FTA's to make a snap call to replay a match unless there is conclusive evidence that the cause was out of the teams control. When there is such evidence, matches are replayed. I've seen it happen when the field has had issues, which does occasionally happen. The issue is identifying the root cause of the failure.

So they're really already doing what you suggest in the last paragraph... it's just rare to be able to make the decision as to root cause.
__________________
2007 - Present: Mentor, 2177 The Robettes
LRI: North Star 2012-2016; Lake Superior 2013-2014; MN State Tournament 2013-2014, 2016; Galileo 2016; Iowa 2017
2015: North Star Regional Volunteer of the Year
2016: Lake Superior WFFA
  #114   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 22-08-2012, 14:54
techhelpbb's Avatar
techhelpbb techhelpbb is offline
Registered User
FRC #0011 (MORT - Team 11)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Rookie Year: 1997
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 1,624
techhelpbb has a reputation beyond reputetechhelpbb has a reputation beyond reputetechhelpbb has a reputation beyond reputetechhelpbb has a reputation beyond reputetechhelpbb has a reputation beyond reputetechhelpbb has a reputation beyond reputetechhelpbb has a reputation beyond reputetechhelpbb has a reputation beyond reputetechhelpbb has a reputation beyond reputetechhelpbb has a reputation beyond reputetechhelpbb has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Team 548 Einstein Statement

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jon Stratis View Post
There are simply too many ways for a robot to fail (as we saw in the Einstein report) for the refs for FTA's to make a snap call to replay a match unless there is conclusive evidence that the cause was out of the teams control. When there is such evidence, matches are replayed. I've seen it happen when the field has had issues, which does occasionally happen. The issue is identifying the root cause of the failure.

So they're really already doing what you suggest in the last paragraph... it's just rare to be able to make the decision as to root cause.
I agree and with the logging on the field communications devices off and the robots mostly not logging the power to the radios (cause we were forbidden to do so per the official answer to my Q&A from 2012) there was no way anyone in the FIRST field crew would have had a good quick way to even narrow down on that issue.

Even if they monitor that radio power there are known and not well known programming pitfalls that can swamp the radios so I admit even the above wouldn't be entirely complete.

Quality of service monitoring on field side isn't a perfect solution either because the field channels can be swamped robot side or by the already mentioned wireless issues. One could track packet communications on the WiFi bridge as well but that'll probably require some custom firmware and some place to stick the data.
  #115   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 22-08-2012, 15:00
Alan Anderson's Avatar
Alan Anderson Alan Anderson is offline
Software Architect
FRC #0045 (TechnoKats)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Rookie Year: 2004
Location: Kokomo, Indiana
Posts: 9,113
Alan Anderson has a reputation beyond reputeAlan Anderson has a reputation beyond reputeAlan Anderson has a reputation beyond reputeAlan Anderson has a reputation beyond reputeAlan Anderson has a reputation beyond reputeAlan Anderson has a reputation beyond reputeAlan Anderson has a reputation beyond reputeAlan Anderson has a reputation beyond reputeAlan Anderson has a reputation beyond reputeAlan Anderson has a reputation beyond reputeAlan Anderson has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Team 548 Einstein Statement

Quote:
Originally Posted by JesseK View Post
Now that an exploit is public knowledge, it's only a matter of creativity for how it's attempted to be abused.
The specific exploit in question is no longer possible. The access point firmware bug that permitted it will not be present in the future.

Other exploits do still exist. Some are essentially impossible to prevent because they are inherent in the nature of 802.11 wireless networking and established security protocols, but they are detectable.
  #116   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 22-08-2012, 15:29
techhelpbb's Avatar
techhelpbb techhelpbb is offline
Registered User
FRC #0011 (MORT - Team 11)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Rookie Year: 1997
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 1,624
techhelpbb has a reputation beyond reputetechhelpbb has a reputation beyond reputetechhelpbb has a reputation beyond reputetechhelpbb has a reputation beyond reputetechhelpbb has a reputation beyond reputetechhelpbb has a reputation beyond reputetechhelpbb has a reputation beyond reputetechhelpbb has a reputation beyond reputetechhelpbb has a reputation beyond reputetechhelpbb has a reputation beyond reputetechhelpbb has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Team 548 Einstein Statement

There is no way I can state my case that the remedies presented in the Einstein report will not be sufficient to prevent exploit in this FIRST related forum or any other FIRST forum publicly. If I make my case, eventually escalating to successful public proof of concept. All I'll be doing is enabling people with bad intentions. Proving my point is not worth the harm it will probably cause to hundreds of thousands of kids.

There is clearly no time remaining to do anything about the issues anyway.

Come what may. I'm glad that having the highest score is not my highest priority.

Last edited by techhelpbb : 22-08-2012 at 15:37.
  #117   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 22-08-2012, 15:30
Siri's Avatar
Siri Siri is offline
Dare greatly
AKA: 1640 coach 2010-2014
FRC #2641 (PCCR; Refs & RIs)
Team Role: Coach
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Rookie Year: 2007
Location: PA
Posts: 1,639
Siri has a reputation beyond reputeSiri has a reputation beyond reputeSiri has a reputation beyond reputeSiri has a reputation beyond reputeSiri has a reputation beyond reputeSiri has a reputation beyond reputeSiri has a reputation beyond reputeSiri has a reputation beyond reputeSiri has a reputation beyond reputeSiri has a reputation beyond reputeSiri has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via ICQ to Siri
Re: Team 548 Einstein Statement

Quote:
Originally Posted by Al Skierkiewicz View Post
I am trying to figure what you are saying in that post.
I seem to have done a pretty poor with this one. This is what I thought I was saying:

@Post 93 DampRobot questions how no one on the official FRC team could have known about this FCA hole.

@Post 95 I point out that it only occurs under limited circumstances, and say I'd therefore be surprised if someone from FIRST tripped on it themselves (while sharing the understanding that they would/should have acted had someone told them).

@Post 97 Astrokid points out that you don't need to know the cause of the issue to happen upon it, and says it's not surprising that someone just thought "What if I connect in during a match?"

@Post 105 (the "HUH?" one), I agree but draw a distinction--which, unbeknownst to me, Astrokid agrees with--between "someone" accidentally discovering it, and a FIRST official happening to do so. I draw this distinction because there are a lot more random "someones" than FIRST officials, FIRST officials tend to be rather preoccupied during matches, and given the otherwise extensive testing of the new Cisco firmware, FIRST officials have every reason to trust their selection and the system as a whole.

@Post 106, Al asks be what on Earth I'm talking about.



On a totally different note, does anyone know if the field saves the data records from the spectrum analyzer, or is it solely live feed?
__________________
  #118   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 22-08-2012, 15:44
BigJ BigJ is offline
Registered User
AKA: Josh P.
FRC #1675 (Ultimate Protection Squad)
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Rookie Year: 2007
Location: Milwaukee, WI
Posts: 947
BigJ has a reputation beyond reputeBigJ has a reputation beyond reputeBigJ has a reputation beyond reputeBigJ has a reputation beyond reputeBigJ has a reputation beyond reputeBigJ has a reputation beyond reputeBigJ has a reputation beyond reputeBigJ has a reputation beyond reputeBigJ has a reputation beyond reputeBigJ has a reputation beyond reputeBigJ has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Team 548 Einstein Statement

Quote:
Originally Posted by techhelpbb View Post
There is no way I can state my case that the remedies presented in the Einstein report will not be sufficient to prevent exploit in this FIRST related forum or any other FIRST forum publicly. If I make my case, eventually escalating to successful public proof of concept. All I'll be doing is enabling people with bad intentions. Proving my point is not worth the harm it will probably cause to hundreds of thousands of kids.

There is clearly no time remaining to do anything about the issues anyway.

Come what may. I'm glad that having the highest score is not my highest priority.
Those with bad enough intentions will probably discover it sooner or later (or have already figured it out. Many exploits in software end up working this way). Disclosure is not always a problem. If you believe there is a reasonable mitigation (such as a firmware update, or more stringent procedures in pits+field) that could be made I'm sure many would appreciate it being public knowledge, especially if you have tried reaching out to FIRST already.

However, if you believe it is an issue with no easy mitigation that shakes the current technology foundation of the field and robot control systems to its core, disclosure might not be the best idea unless you are reasonably sure someone is using it.

Just my two cents.
  #119   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 22-08-2012, 15:53
techhelpbb's Avatar
techhelpbb techhelpbb is offline
Registered User
FRC #0011 (MORT - Team 11)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Rookie Year: 1997
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 1,624
techhelpbb has a reputation beyond reputetechhelpbb has a reputation beyond reputetechhelpbb has a reputation beyond reputetechhelpbb has a reputation beyond reputetechhelpbb has a reputation beyond reputetechhelpbb has a reputation beyond reputetechhelpbb has a reputation beyond reputetechhelpbb has a reputation beyond reputetechhelpbb has a reputation beyond reputetechhelpbb has a reputation beyond reputetechhelpbb has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Team 548 Einstein Statement

Quote:
Originally Posted by BigJ View Post
Those with bad enough intentions will probably discover it sooner or later (or have already figured it out. Many exploits in software end up working this way). Disclosure is not always a problem. If you believe there is a reasonable mitigation (such as a firmware update, or more stringent procedures in pits+field) that could be made I'm sure many would appreciate it being public knowledge, especially if you have tried reaching out to FIRST already.

However, if you believe it is an issue with no easy mitigation that shakes the current technology foundation of the field and robot control systems to its core, disclosure might not be the best idea unless you are reasonably sure someone is using it.

Just my two cents.
I have both sorts of exploits and I have already disclosed this to FIRST 30 days ago so let's start with this:

For one the problem is the way the fields are laid out geometrically and the way areas of common play are positioned. I won't say why this is a problem I will say that a single WIPS sensor per field is not sufficient because of it.

There should be a minimum of 2 of those sensors per field diagonal from each other across the long dimension of the field. Take a good look at where the current AirTight sensor generally ends up and it's proximity to the Cisco hardware.

By the way, this was the very first thought to run through my head given the fact that one alliance or another seemed to be disproportionally likely to have issues.

Last edited by techhelpbb : 22-08-2012 at 16:11.
  #120   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 22-08-2012, 16:26
Unsung FIRST Hero
Al Skierkiewicz Al Skierkiewicz is offline
Broadcast Eng/Chief Robot Inspector
AKA: Big Al WFFA 2005
FRC #0111 (WildStang)
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Rookie Year: 1996
Location: Wheeling, IL
Posts: 10,798
Al Skierkiewicz has a reputation beyond reputeAl Skierkiewicz has a reputation beyond reputeAl Skierkiewicz has a reputation beyond reputeAl Skierkiewicz has a reputation beyond reputeAl Skierkiewicz has a reputation beyond reputeAl Skierkiewicz has a reputation beyond reputeAl Skierkiewicz has a reputation beyond reputeAl Skierkiewicz has a reputation beyond reputeAl Skierkiewicz has a reputation beyond reputeAl Skierkiewicz has a reputation beyond reputeAl Skierkiewicz has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Team 548 Einstein Statement

Siri,
I read your post and thought that you were indicating that First engineering had already made the attempt to connect to robots by the time Einstein occurred. then I read further and became more and more confused as to what point you were trying to make. So let me make a few statements. No one at First, to my knowledge, had attempted to connect to a robot during competition. Of course they performed all kinds of testing in the off season and during other events. They constantly take in info from team members, even though they may not acknowledge that they received the info. They perform tests at HQ and ask FTAs to try things in the field. First also reaches out to trusted technical volunteers for their input and testing when needed, to insure that a good cross section of robot design and programming platforms are tested.
Teams attempting to control their own robots at home on their practice fields using 2.4 GHz wifi bands are common. I have done it with my phone and my robot. There are several apps available for Android and iPhone that identify available networks and some actually will do spectrum display showing network ID and signal strength. I checked my phone (I can turn wifi access on and off) between matches on Einstein and found a total of three at 2.4 GHz in addition to any robot radios that were on, and two of them were house Fan network points for use during games. Not what you would expect with all those phones and tablets out there in the stands. There was a spectrum analyzer in place to check for networks coming on line and searching for available connections. To my knowledge that does not keep a log but I can tell you several people were checking that during matches, myself included.
I would like to point people to the list of experts that were present during the Einstein weekend. In that list you will find people from Qualcom who were part of the design team for 802.11 communications and set the specifications, people from Cisco, RF experts from Deka, the wireless consultant that designs systems in the Boston area and worked on the FRC wifi design and a variety of First engineering staff, computer experts and RF Engineers. All of them brought or ordered up whatever tools they felt would be needed to analyze the field and robot communications. Their intention was to find what caused the failures on Einstein and to make an attempt to break the control system in use. I have not seen a group of people so anxious to break something and show off than those assembled. Yes, they found that there are some things that can be done to improve the wifi configuration and improve data transfers and prevent outages. However, and I can't stress this enough, during Einstein the only repeatable failure of wifi control that is supported by robot logs, observation, robot action, etc. was that of the admitted intrusion by a mentor on the field.
__________________
Good Luck All. Learn something new, everyday!
Al
WB9UVJ
www.wildstang.org
________________________
Storming the Tower since 1996.

Last edited by Al Skierkiewicz : 22-08-2012 at 16:32.
Closed Thread


Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 18:42.

The Chief Delphi Forums are sponsored by Innovation First International, Inc.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi