Team 548 Einstein Statement

[EricVanWyk]

Originally Posted by techhelpbb

I have both sorts of exploits and I have already disclosed this to FIRST 30 days ago so let's start with this:

For one the problem is the way the fields are laid out geometrically and the way areas of common play are positioned. I won't say why this is a problem I will say that a single WIPS sensor per field is not sufficient because of it.

There should be a minimum of 2 of those sensors per field diagonal from each other across the long dimension of the field. Take a good look at where the current AirTight sensor generally ends up and it's proximity to the Cisco hardware.

By the way, this was the very first thought to run through my head given the fact that one alliance or another seemed to be disproportionally likely to have issues.

Brian, please stop spreading FUD. I can already see the direction you are aiming, and quite simply physics does not work that way. You are simultaneously crying that the sky is falling and threatening to make the sky fall.

I ask you to consider why you feel that FRCHQ is unresponsive, and why others do not feel that way. Is it HQ? Is it the others? Or is it you?