|
|
|
| I'd take a spoiler for you any day. |
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#16
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Quote:
See this thread. -dave |
|
#17
|
||||
|
||||
|
I agree that this violates the rules. This would qualify as a custom pneumatic device and that is strictly prohibited. If you were joking, please don't abuse the forums and waste space. These forums are meant for technical discussion, not for misleading comments.
I agree however, that the tubing can be used as an accumulator, but I wouldn't recommend it because of the space it uses up. |
|
#18
|
||||||
|
||||||
|
Re: You dont need any tanks
Quote:
Andy B. |
|
#19
|
||||||
|
||||||
|
If you're that desperate for air storage use the extrra tube that came with the kit. Last year we figured out it had slightly more volume than one of the supplied reserviors and weighed slightly less. But we didn't have the volume in the robot to make it work.
Do it yourself pressure vessels (what Mr. Harbison was proposing) are a VERY BAD IDEA. Engineering is the continual exercise of judgement. That includes judgement on when you are getting in over your head. I am a licensed mechanical engineer. In this state that means that I am legally qualified to design and build pressure vessels. BUT because that is not what I normally do, I would never attempt it. I am just not familiar enough with the design methodology and safety standards to do a good enough job to ensure I don't kill somebody. If I'm over my head on something like this, chances are you are too. Not only is it against the rules it is just plain STUPID. When you pull something like this you are playing with the eyes, limbs and maybe lives of everyone around the robot. You have created a potential bomb. Pnuematic components are fabricatred to comply with strict codes to ensure they do not fail under designed use. If they should fail, something is likely to go flying at high velocity. Very few, if any teams have the expertise on board to design their own pnuematic elements in such a way as to conform to industry standards. That is why the use of self designed and constructed pnuematics is prohibited. DON"T DO THIS Have we made ourselves clear? |
|
#20
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
![]() |
|
#21
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#22
|
|||
|
|||
|
thought it was a little too much to hope for....
|
|
#23
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Number of cylinders
Quote:
---------------------------------------------------------------------- Posted By: first Posts: 168 / Registered: Dec, 2002 You must use the cylinder that was provided and you may get three more cylinders using the Custom Cylinder Order Form.. See the Part Use Flowchart. 36F [Edited by: first on Jan 10, 2003 5:18 PM] ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Which is sorta strange. We MUST use the cylinder that was in the kit? What if we don't need that one? Bruce C. |
|
#24
|
||||||
|
||||||
|
Re: Re: Number of cylinders
Quote:
Last edited by ChrisH : 13-01-2003 at 12:04. |
|
#25
|
||||||
|
||||||
|
It would be acceptable as long as you only put 60psi in it. The pneumatics rules aren't very clear this year about what can be 120 and what has to be <60, but my guess is the only thing allowed upstream of the 60psi regulator is the compressor, pressure switch, gauges, tanks, and fittings.
The pneumatics manual states: "This regulator has a maximum output pressure of 60psi. This regulator must be placed in-line right after the tanks to limit the pressure to all working circuits to 60psi." |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| pnuematics | great_one411 | Pneumatics | 1 | 16-02-2003 11:50 |
| Help with Pnuematics | inwoodraider | Pneumatics | 3 | 30-01-2003 17:27 |
| Speed Controller Limits | yaman | Technical Discussion | 11 | 15-01-2003 18:40 |
| Pnuematics Manual | ark_1230 | Pneumatics | 2 | 09-09-2002 18:29 |
| Seizing Self Defense: What limits? (Rules of Engagement) | kmcclary | Rules/Strategy | 19 | 28-02-2002 20:04 |