Go to Post I encourage the communication of constructive ideas on how to make FIRST a better program. - meaubry [more]
Home
Go Back   Chief Delphi > Technical > Technical Discussion
CD-Media   CD-Spy  
portal register members calendar search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read FAQ rules

 
Closed Thread
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #16   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 09-09-2012, 01:18
jspatz1's Avatar
jspatz1 jspatz1 is offline
Registered User
AKA: Jeff
FRC #1986 (Team Titanium)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Rookie Year: 2007
Location: Lee's Summit, MO
Posts: 836
jspatz1 has a reputation beyond reputejspatz1 has a reputation beyond reputejspatz1 has a reputation beyond reputejspatz1 has a reputation beyond reputejspatz1 has a reputation beyond reputejspatz1 has a reputation beyond reputejspatz1 has a reputation beyond reputejspatz1 has a reputation beyond reputejspatz1 has a reputation beyond reputejspatz1 has a reputation beyond reputejspatz1 has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to jspatz1
Re: Andy Mark Supershifter with Pneumatic shifters

Quote:
Originally Posted by Coffeeism View Post
Well for a 20PSI 1/2 inch cylinder you would get about 4.5 lbs. Here's a random solenoid close to spec that is about 2.2 lb push, 6.6 lb pull. Could probably alter the spring to even out the force?
This solenoid is one-directional, push only. The spring return is only minimal to return the armature to the retracted position when de-energized. It is also intermitant duty, which means it can be energized no more than 50% of the time without overheating. A shifting actuator must maintain force in either direction at all times. This is one reason an air cylinder is well suited to the job. A continuous duty solenoid of this same wattage would have about 1/3 the force.
__________________
  #17   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 09-09-2012, 01:34
jspatz1's Avatar
jspatz1 jspatz1 is offline
Registered User
AKA: Jeff
FRC #1986 (Team Titanium)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Rookie Year: 2007
Location: Lee's Summit, MO
Posts: 836
jspatz1 has a reputation beyond reputejspatz1 has a reputation beyond reputejspatz1 has a reputation beyond reputejspatz1 has a reputation beyond reputejspatz1 has a reputation beyond reputejspatz1 has a reputation beyond reputejspatz1 has a reputation beyond reputejspatz1 has a reputation beyond reputejspatz1 has a reputation beyond reputejspatz1 has a reputation beyond reputejspatz1 has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to jspatz1
Re: Andy Mark Supershifter with Pneumatic shifters

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ravage457 View Post
What diameter pin should I use after I had drilled it out?

Hmmmm....I think the solenoid shifter is my next project, thank you for the input and advice

What teams had used this solenoid set up?
3/32.

As I mentioned this is the first year solenoid actuators have even been permitted on a FRC robot, so there is no history of them being used for shifting that I know of. If someone successfully did this in 2012 I would be curious to hear about it.
__________________
  #18   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 09-09-2012, 20:33
Ravage457's Avatar
Ravage457 Ravage457 is offline
Ravage457
AKA: Jesus Jurado
FRC #0457 (Grease Monkeys)
Team Role: Coach
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Rookie Year: 2004
Location: San Antonio, Texas
Posts: 94
Ravage457 is a splendid one to beholdRavage457 is a splendid one to beholdRavage457 is a splendid one to beholdRavage457 is a splendid one to beholdRavage457 is a splendid one to beholdRavage457 is a splendid one to beholdRavage457 is a splendid one to behold
Re: Andy Mark Supershifter with Pneumatic shifters

Yes i agree with jspatz1 about this conversaion, but im also wondering about this solenoid shifter, if anyone has use this setup,please feel free to add to this conversation, i see the pros and cons about using pneumatic shifters......what are the pros and cons using solenoid shifters
__________________
FRC Team 457 "04-"05,"07-"08,"11-Present
Lead Drive Train Mentor/Drive Team Head Coach
2014 Dallas Regional Winners:#1 Alliance-Captain: 148, 1st:359, 2nd:457
2013 Hub City Off-Season Event Winner:#1 Alliance- Captain: 457, 1st:3366, 2nd:1817
2012 Alamo Regional Winner:#3 Alliance- Captain:231, 1st:1477, 2nd:457
2012 Ozark Mountain Brawl Winners:#8 Alliance - Captain:1986, 1st:1987, 2nd: 457
2012 Texas Robot Roundup Winners:#1 Alliance- Captain:118, 1st:624, 2nd:457, Backup:4332
  #19   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 09-09-2012, 20:44
MichaelBick MichaelBick is offline
Registered User
FRC #1836 (MilkenKnights)
Team Role: Alumni
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Rookie Year: 2010
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 734
MichaelBick has a brilliant futureMichaelBick has a brilliant futureMichaelBick has a brilliant futureMichaelBick has a brilliant futureMichaelBick has a brilliant futureMichaelBick has a brilliant futureMichaelBick has a brilliant futureMichaelBick has a brilliant futureMichaelBick has a brilliant futureMichaelBick has a brilliant futureMichaelBick has a brilliant future
Re: Andy Mark Supershifter with Pneumatic shifters

pros: less weight(no compressor and tanks)

cons: slower
__________________
Team 1836 - The Milken Knights
2013 LA Regional Champions with 1717 and 973
2012 LA Regional Finalists with 294 and 973
To follow Team 1836 on Facebook, go to http://www.facebook.com/MilkenKnights
To go to our website, go to http://milkenknights.com/index.html
  #20   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 09-09-2012, 21:37
kevin.li.rit's Avatar
kevin.li.rit kevin.li.rit is offline
Imaginary Friend
AKA: Kevin Li
FRC #0596 (SciClones)
Team Role: Student
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Rookie Year: 2001
Location: Hopkinton, Massachusetts
Posts: 936
kevin.li.rit has a reputation beyond reputekevin.li.rit has a reputation beyond reputekevin.li.rit has a reputation beyond reputekevin.li.rit has a reputation beyond reputekevin.li.rit has a reputation beyond reputekevin.li.rit has a reputation beyond reputekevin.li.rit has a reputation beyond reputekevin.li.rit has a reputation beyond reputekevin.li.rit has a reputation beyond reputekevin.li.rit has a reputation beyond reputekevin.li.rit has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via Yahoo to kevin.li.rit
Re: Andy Mark Supershifter with Pneumatic shifters

Quote:
Originally Posted by jspatz1 View Post
All my comments are assuming a pneumatic system is already available. Comparisons to air shifting should be done at 60 psi, not 20 psi. The solenoid wattage which was allowed in 2012 would not begin to approach the force of an air cylinder for a continuous duty solenoid. Keep in mind that solenoids are one-directional, and their "rated" force exists only in a small fraction of their total stroke.
Why should it be 60 PSI? Shouldn't it be closer to the actual force required?

Our own shifters we had, we've always run at 20 PSI for the solenoid valves sake. I was under the assumption that it took less force than the 12 lbs to shift but I could be wrong about this as I have no experience with the super shifters.
__________________
Kevin Li

596 - Sciclones
1405 - Finney Falcons
2262 - Holliston Panthers

Last edited by kevin.li.rit : 09-09-2012 at 21:57. Reason: Grammar
  #21   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 09-09-2012, 21:51
protoserge's Avatar
protoserge protoserge is offline
CAD, machining, circuits, fun!
AKA: Some call me... Tim?
FRC #0365 (MOE) & former 836 Mentor)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Rookie Year: 2002
Location: Wilmington, DE
Posts: 754
protoserge has a reputation beyond reputeprotoserge has a reputation beyond reputeprotoserge has a reputation beyond reputeprotoserge has a reputation beyond reputeprotoserge has a reputation beyond reputeprotoserge has a reputation beyond reputeprotoserge has a reputation beyond reputeprotoserge has a reputation beyond reputeprotoserge has a reputation beyond reputeprotoserge has a reputation beyond reputeprotoserge has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Andy Mark Supershifter with Pneumatic shifters

Quote:
Originally Posted by Coffeeism View Post
Why should it be 60 PSI? Shouldn't it be closer to the actual force required?

The own shifters we had we've always run at 20 PSI for the solenoid valves sake. I was under the assumption that it took less force than the 12 lbs to shift but I could be wrong about this as I have no experience with the super shifters.
We run our SuperShifters at 20 psi as well without issue. 60psi shifts with 27 lbs of force (force = pressure*area, where the Bimba 040.5-DP has a 3/4" bore).

Another setup that I've heard of is using a window motor coupled to both transmissions with a spring setup to engage the gear if it is not lined up during the initial gear change request. I do not know what team had this setup, but it is definitely worth researching some more as it could offset the weight of a pneumatics system, even those with pvc air reservoirs.

Last edited by protoserge : 09-09-2012 at 22:08.
  #22   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 09-09-2012, 21:55
AdamHeard's Avatar
AdamHeard AdamHeard is offline
Lead Mentor
FRC #0973 (Greybots)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Rookie Year: 2004
Location: Atascadero
Posts: 5,508
AdamHeard has a reputation beyond reputeAdamHeard has a reputation beyond reputeAdamHeard has a reputation beyond reputeAdamHeard has a reputation beyond reputeAdamHeard has a reputation beyond reputeAdamHeard has a reputation beyond reputeAdamHeard has a reputation beyond reputeAdamHeard has a reputation beyond reputeAdamHeard has a reputation beyond reputeAdamHeard has a reputation beyond reputeAdamHeard has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to AdamHeard
Re: Andy Mark Supershifter with Pneumatic shifters

Quote:
Originally Posted by stinglikeabee View Post
We run our SuperShifters at 20 psi as well. 60psi shifts with 76lbs of force (force = pressure/area).

Another setup that I've heard of is using a window motor coupled to both transmissions with a spring setup to engage the gear if it is not lined up during the initial gear change request. I do not know what team had this setup, but it is definitely worth researching some more as it could offset the weight of a pneumatics system, even those with pvc air reservoirs.
Force = Pressure * Area. Much smaller force there.
  #23   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 09-09-2012, 21:57
David Doerr's Avatar
David Doerr David Doerr is offline
Registered User
FRC #4478 (Materia Oscura)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Rookie Year: 2002
Location: Milford, Michigan, USA
Posts: 75
David Doerr has much to be proud ofDavid Doerr has much to be proud ofDavid Doerr has much to be proud ofDavid Doerr has much to be proud ofDavid Doerr has much to be proud ofDavid Doerr has much to be proud ofDavid Doerr has much to be proud ofDavid Doerr has much to be proud of
Re: Andy Mark Supershifter with Pneumatic shifters

Quote:
Originally Posted by stinglikeabee View Post
Another setup that I've heard of is using a window motor coupled to both transmissions with a spring setup to engage the gear if it is not lined up during the initial gear change request. I do not know what team had this setup, but it is definitely worth researching some more as it could offset the weight of a pneumatics system, even those with pvc air reservoirs.
That would be Team 67...
  #24   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 09-09-2012, 21:59
protoserge's Avatar
protoserge protoserge is offline
CAD, machining, circuits, fun!
AKA: Some call me... Tim?
FRC #0365 (MOE) & former 836 Mentor)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Rookie Year: 2002
Location: Wilmington, DE
Posts: 754
protoserge has a reputation beyond reputeprotoserge has a reputation beyond reputeprotoserge has a reputation beyond reputeprotoserge has a reputation beyond reputeprotoserge has a reputation beyond reputeprotoserge has a reputation beyond reputeprotoserge has a reputation beyond reputeprotoserge has a reputation beyond reputeprotoserge has a reputation beyond reputeprotoserge has a reputation beyond reputeprotoserge has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Andy Mark Supershifter with Pneumatic shifters

Quote:
Originally Posted by AdamHeard View Post
Force = Pressure * Area. Much smaller force there.
That's a clue that I should go to bed.

Fixed for posterity, thanks.

Last edited by protoserge : 09-09-2012 at 22:04.
  #25   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 09-09-2012, 22:32
jspatz1's Avatar
jspatz1 jspatz1 is offline
Registered User
AKA: Jeff
FRC #1986 (Team Titanium)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Rookie Year: 2007
Location: Lee's Summit, MO
Posts: 836
jspatz1 has a reputation beyond reputejspatz1 has a reputation beyond reputejspatz1 has a reputation beyond reputejspatz1 has a reputation beyond reputejspatz1 has a reputation beyond reputejspatz1 has a reputation beyond reputejspatz1 has a reputation beyond reputejspatz1 has a reputation beyond reputejspatz1 has a reputation beyond reputejspatz1 has a reputation beyond reputejspatz1 has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to jspatz1
Re: Andy Mark Supershifter with Pneumatic shifters

Quote:
Originally Posted by Coffeeism View Post
Why should it be 60 PSI? Shouldn't it be closer to the actual force required?

Our own shifters we had, we've always run at 20 PSI for the solenoid valves sake. I was under the assumption that it took less force than the 12 lbs to shift but I could be wrong about this as I have no experience with the super shifters.
Pneumatic solenoid valves of the type used in FRC are internally piloted valves, which means the pressurized supply air is used to actuate the valve spool, not the solenoid. The solenoid is very small and only opens a tiny port to trigger the pilot air. Such valves have a minimum pressure that will allow it to operate, usually around 30-40 psi. So they actually prefer a high pressure and only function reliably when it is sufficient. So a note to teams: If you have a valve that is not responding when you are certain it is getting a proper electrical input, and you are using low pressure, chances are the pressure too low for the valve to operate.
__________________
  #26   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 09-09-2012, 22:40
kevin.li.rit's Avatar
kevin.li.rit kevin.li.rit is offline
Imaginary Friend
AKA: Kevin Li
FRC #0596 (SciClones)
Team Role: Student
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Rookie Year: 2001
Location: Hopkinton, Massachusetts
Posts: 936
kevin.li.rit has a reputation beyond reputekevin.li.rit has a reputation beyond reputekevin.li.rit has a reputation beyond reputekevin.li.rit has a reputation beyond reputekevin.li.rit has a reputation beyond reputekevin.li.rit has a reputation beyond reputekevin.li.rit has a reputation beyond reputekevin.li.rit has a reputation beyond reputekevin.li.rit has a reputation beyond reputekevin.li.rit has a reputation beyond reputekevin.li.rit has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via Yahoo to kevin.li.rit
Re: Andy Mark Supershifter with Pneumatic shifters

Quote:
Originally Posted by jspatz1 View Post
Pneumatic solenoid valves of the type used in FRC are internally piloted valves, which means the pressurized supply air is used to actuate the valve spool, not the solenoid. The solenoid is very small and only opens a tiny port to trigger the pilot air. Such valves have a minimum pressure that will allow it to operate, usually around 30-40 psi. So they actually prefer a high pressure and only function reliably when it is sufficient. So a note to teams: If you have a valve that is not responding when you are certain it is getting a proper electrical input, and you are using low pressure, chances are the pressure too low for the valve to operate.
Right, and the minimum pressure for the valve we were using was at 20PSI. For me, that's not a good reason to say that you need to generate the same force as a 60psi 1/2" piston with a push/pull solenoid to make the thing work.
__________________
Kevin Li

596 - Sciclones
1405 - Finney Falcons
2262 - Holliston Panthers
Closed Thread


Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:31.

The Chief Delphi Forums are sponsored by Innovation First International, Inc.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi