Go to Post No matter what the weight limit is, a large number of teams will *ALWAYS* have trouble making it. - Cory [more]
Home
Go Back   Chief Delphi > Other > FIRST Tech Challenge
CD-Media   CD-Spy  
portal register members calendar search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read FAQ rules

 
Reply
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 08-09-2012, 16:30
normalmutant's Avatar
normalmutant normalmutant is offline
Registered User
AKA: Nathan
FTC #3539 (Say Watt?)
Team Role: Alumni
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Rookie Year: 2006
Location: Edison, NJ
Posts: 126
normalmutant has a spectacular aura aboutnormalmutant has a spectacular aura about
[FTC]: Ring It Up! Scoring Potential

MAX. SCORING POTENTIAL:
Autonomous ring bonus: 50 pts.
Score from rings on all pegs on own alliance’s side: (3*(15+10+5)) = 90 pts.
Bonus from all pegs owned on own alliance’s side: (30*8) = 240 pts.
All pegs owned on opposing side: (90+240) 330 pts.
Bonus from 6 weighted rings: (20%*6*180) = 216 pts.
Lifting a robot 24”: (30+(23*5)) = 145 pts.

TOTAL = 1071 pts.

However, this is nowhere near possible. Just calculating it for fun. Or you could say I'm ringing up the numbers for fun. Hyuck hyuck hyuck... Let the horrible puns begin...
__________________
SAY-WATT.ORG

Last edited by normalmutant : 08-09-2012 at 16:50.
Reply With Quote
  #2   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 08-09-2012, 17:40
Andrew Lawrence
 
Posts: n/a
Re: [FTC]: Ring It Up! Scoring Potential

This game looks a lot like the 2011 FRC game, Logomotion (I mean A LOT), and has the robot lifting element from FRC 2007. I also love how they had the Curiosity Rover as one of the robots in the game animation.

Looks like it'll be an interesting season.
Reply With Quote
  #3   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 08-09-2012, 17:53
ehochstein's Avatar
ehochstein ehochstein is offline
Coach, Volunteer & Mentor
AKA: Evan Hochstein
FTC #5943 (ESGM)
Team Role: Coach
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Rookie Year: 2007
Location: Bloomington, Minnesota
Posts: 933
ehochstein has a brilliant futureehochstein has a brilliant futureehochstein has a brilliant futureehochstein has a brilliant futureehochstein has a brilliant futureehochstein has a brilliant futureehochstein has a brilliant futureehochstein has a brilliant futureehochstein has a brilliant futureehochstein has a brilliant futureehochstein has a brilliant future
Re: [FTC]: Ring It Up! Scoring Potential

There are just so many ways to gain points in this game!! I wonder how many teams will be able to lift robots super high, I haven't actually looked too deep into the game manual yet but is there a maximum height?
__________________
Minnesota FIRST Senior Mentor | 2013-?

Stratasys Applications Engineering Technician | 2016-?

2009 Regional Win – 2470 @ 10k Lakes (Thanks 2826 and 1714)
2013 WFFA Recipient – 2470 @ 10K Lakes
2016 Ri3D: 'Snow Problem Reveal
2017 Ri3D: 'Snow Problem Reveal

The opinions expressed above are the personal opinions of the author and do not necessarily represent the views and opinions of any organization the author is affiliated with.
Reply With Quote
  #4   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 08-09-2012, 18:07
Coin3's Avatar
Coin3 Coin3 is offline
Registered User
AKA: Griffin Cerva
FRC #4110 (Deep Space Niners)
Team Role: Leadership
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Rookie Year: 2011
Location: Brookings, OR
Posts: 47
Coin3 is an unknown quantity at this point
Re: [FTC]: Ring It Up! Scoring Potential

^The maximum height for lifting a robot is 24 inches.

I'm very excited for this years game. It's my second year, and I must say I really prefer the simplicity of this years game over Bowled Over. Instead of having a crowded playfield full of crates, balls, 2 ramps, and having defined areas for where balls the balls robots go, we now have a clean area. The robots can be placed anywhere against the wall on their alliances side, as long as it's not touching anything but the wall(and ground). I'm liking it.

Does anyone know how high up the third row of pegs is?
Reply With Quote
  #5   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 08-09-2012, 18:15
ehochstein's Avatar
ehochstein ehochstein is offline
Coach, Volunteer & Mentor
AKA: Evan Hochstein
FTC #5943 (ESGM)
Team Role: Coach
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Rookie Year: 2007
Location: Bloomington, Minnesota
Posts: 933
ehochstein has a brilliant futureehochstein has a brilliant futureehochstein has a brilliant futureehochstein has a brilliant futureehochstein has a brilliant futureehochstein has a brilliant futureehochstein has a brilliant futureehochstein has a brilliant futureehochstein has a brilliant futureehochstein has a brilliant futureehochstein has a brilliant future
Re: [FTC]: Ring It Up! Scoring Potential

Quote:
Originally Posted by Coin3 View Post
^The maximum height for lifting a robot is 24 inches.

I'm very excited for this years game. It's my second year, and I must say I really prefer the simplicity of this years game over Bowled Over. Instead of having a crowded playfield full of crates, balls, 2 ramps, and having defined areas for where balls the balls robots go, we now have a clean area. The robots can be placed anywhere against the wall on their alliances side, as long as it's not touching anything but the wall(and ground). I'm liking it.

Does anyone know how high up the third row of pegs is?
I'm so glad they put a limit on it this year! After seeing the field first hand at the local kickoff the highest row of pegs looked to be a little over half as tall as I am, so not too high... At least when it comes to my FRC standards *remembers Logomotion*
__________________
Minnesota FIRST Senior Mentor | 2013-?

Stratasys Applications Engineering Technician | 2016-?

2009 Regional Win – 2470 @ 10k Lakes (Thanks 2826 and 1714)
2013 WFFA Recipient – 2470 @ 10K Lakes
2016 Ri3D: 'Snow Problem Reveal
2017 Ri3D: 'Snow Problem Reveal

The opinions expressed above are the personal opinions of the author and do not necessarily represent the views and opinions of any organization the author is affiliated with.
Reply With Quote
  #6   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 08-09-2012, 19:16
Andrew Remmers's Avatar
Andrew Remmers Andrew Remmers is offline
Registered User
AKA: Andrew Remmers
no team
Team Role: College Student
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Rookie Year: 2007
Location: Orlando
Posts: 390
Andrew Remmers has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew Remmers has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew Remmers has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew Remmers has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew Remmers has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew Remmers has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew Remmers has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew Remmers has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew Remmers has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew Remmers has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew Remmers has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to Andrew Remmers
Re: [FTC]: Ring It Up! Scoring Potential

I like this game. A lot. Its not hanging but I can do with some robot on robot action.

Reminds me personally of 2005 Triple Play, 2007 Rack N' Roll, and 2011 Logomotion.
__________________
Exploding Bacon 2007-2011

Built and Dangerous (B.A.D) 2011-2012

Community Mentor / School Break 2012-2014

North American Robotics: The MooseEagles Founding Member 2012-Present (VEX U)

Reply With Quote
  #7   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 08-09-2012, 21:03
iPenguin's Avatar
iPenguin iPenguin is offline
Registered User
AKA: Adam Lowe
FTC #5875 (GENIUS)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Rookie Year: 2005
Location: Georgia
Posts: 442
iPenguin has a brilliant futureiPenguin has a brilliant futureiPenguin has a brilliant futureiPenguin has a brilliant futureiPenguin has a brilliant futureiPenguin has a brilliant futureiPenguin has a brilliant futureiPenguin has a brilliant futureiPenguin has a brilliant futureiPenguin has a brilliant futureiPenguin has a brilliant future
Re: [FTC]: Ring It Up! Scoring Potential

Quote:
Originally Posted by normalmutant View Post
MAX. SCORING POTENTIAL:
Autonomous ring bonus: 50 pts.
Score from rings on all pegs on own alliance’s side: (3*(15+10+5)) = 90 pts.
Bonus from all pegs owned on own alliance’s side: (30*8) = 240 pts.
All pegs owned on opposing side: (90+240) 330 pts.
Bonus from 6 weighted rings: (20%*6*180) = 216 pts.
Lifting a robot 24”: (30+(23*5)) = 145 pts.

TOTAL = 1071 pts.
Not quite there.

You have 26 Rings of your color. Put 6 of them as weighted rings on the corner goal for a 120% Ring Score + Line Score Bonus. That leaves 2 Auto and 18 Regular. Put 1 regular on each peg, giving a ring score of 180, and a line bonus of 480. The weighted ring bonus adds 120% of 660 (180+480) which gives 792. You also have those 2 autonomous rings and if you put them on the highest row that is also on the IR beacon column, that's another 100 points (not 50). Add in the 145 for lifting your partner 24".

To sum that up, I get:
180 (RING SCORE)
+480 (LINE SCORE)
+792 (WEIGHTED RING BONUS)
+130 (AUTONOMOUS RINGS)
+145 (LIFTING BONUS)
For a grand total of...1,727 Points

Still, completely theoretical.
__________________
2013 Season-Long Fantasy FIRST Elgin Clock Award Winner - Peach Alliance
Since 2008
2012-Present: FTC #5875, GENIUS
2008-2012: FRC & FTC #1002, The CircuitRunners

"Invention, my dear friends, is 93% perspiration, 6% electricity, 4% evaporation, and 2% butterscotch ripple."
~Gene Wilder as Willy Wonka
Reply With Quote
  #8   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 08-09-2012, 22:58
normalmutant's Avatar
normalmutant normalmutant is offline
Registered User
AKA: Nathan
FTC #3539 (Say Watt?)
Team Role: Alumni
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Rookie Year: 2006
Location: Edison, NJ
Posts: 126
normalmutant has a spectacular aura aboutnormalmutant has a spectacular aura about
Re: [FTC]: Ring It Up! Scoring Potential

Quote:
Originally Posted by Coin3 View Post
Does anyone know how high up the third row of pegs is?
Around 35" I believe.
__________________
SAY-WATT.ORG
Reply With Quote
  #9   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 09-09-2012, 10:09
Paxorf Paxorf is offline
Registered User
FTC #4299 (The Battery Powered Picklejar Heads)
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Rookie Year: 2007
Location: Lexington, MA
Posts: 10
Paxorf is an unknown quantity at this point
Re: [FTC]: Ring It Up! Scoring Potential

Quote:
Originally Posted by normalmutant View Post
Around 35" I believe.
Actually the middle one is around 35". The high pegs are about 48" tall. (I could be wrong, but that's what the math adds up to in the building guide).
Reply With Quote
  #10   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 09-09-2012, 17:19
peragon peragon is offline
Registered User
FTC #3608
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Oskaloosa
Posts: 1
peragon is an unknown quantity at this point
Re: [FTC]: Ring It Up! Scoring Potential

Quote:
Originally Posted by Paxorf View Post
Actually the middle one is around 35". The high pegs are about 48" tall. (I could be wrong, but that's what the math adds up to in the building guide).
If I read the guide correctly, the bottom pvc is 10 inches, and the top two are 12 inches, giving us 34 inches. Add 3-4 inches for fittings and we have a height of ~37 inches.
Reply With Quote
  #11   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 09-09-2012, 18:36
Paxorf Paxorf is offline
Registered User
FTC #4299 (The Battery Powered Picklejar Heads)
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Rookie Year: 2007
Location: Lexington, MA
Posts: 10
Paxorf is an unknown quantity at this point
Re: [FTC]: Ring It Up! Scoring Potential

Quote:
Originally Posted by peragon View Post
If I read the guide correctly, the bottom pvc is 10 inches, and the top two are 12 inches, giving us 34 inches. Add 3-4 inches for fittings and we have a height of ~37 inches.
The base adds another 4-5 inches too (diagrams for the base are earlier in the guide). So maybe around 40 inches?

I heard 35-36" for the middle peg at the kickoff, but maybe they measured wrong, or maybe they were talking about the high peg. I may have misheard as well.
Reply With Quote
  #12   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 10-09-2012, 10:21
JesseK's Avatar
JesseK JesseK is offline
Expert Flybot Crasher
FRC #1885 (ILITE)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Rookie Year: 2005
Location: Reston, VA
Posts: 3,700
JesseK has a reputation beyond reputeJesseK has a reputation beyond reputeJesseK has a reputation beyond reputeJesseK has a reputation beyond reputeJesseK has a reputation beyond reputeJesseK has a reputation beyond reputeJesseK has a reputation beyond reputeJesseK has a reputation beyond reputeJesseK has a reputation beyond reputeJesseK has a reputation beyond reputeJesseK has a reputation beyond repute
Re: [FTC]: Ring It Up! Scoring Potential

Most matches will be lucky to see a score above 200. I predict a November/December average score of 80, with most successful alliances averaging 150 or so points by February.

For what it's worth, this is coming from the guy who found the Lockout strategy in the '09-'10 game (yes, there was one), and who figured out how to 'most likely' win the '11-'12 game on the Monday following kickoff (one of my teams did win champs this year...). Right now I don't see a "lock out" or "probably win" scenario that's guaranteed once executed, but I then again I've only read the rules rather than analyzed them. YMMV though.

Focus on the simple things, leaving flexibility for the larger picture. That's the key to FTC (well, having a kick-butt autonomous helps too...).
__________________

Drive Coach, 1885 (2007-present)
CAD Library Updated 5/1/16 - 2016 Curie/Carver Industrial Design Winner
GitHub

Last edited by JesseK : 10-09-2012 at 10:24.
Reply With Quote
  #13   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 10-09-2012, 12:16
Joachim Joachim is offline
Registered User
no team
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Corning NY
Posts: 52
Joachim has a spectacular aura aboutJoachim has a spectacular aura aboutJoachim has a spectacular aura about
Re: [FTC]: Ring It Up! Scoring Potential

Quote:
Originally Posted by iPenguin View Post
I get:
180 (RING SCORE)
+480 (LINE SCORE)
+792 (WEIGHTED RING BONUS)
+130 (AUTONOMOUS RINGS)
+145 (LIFTING BONUS)
For a grand total of...1,727 Points

Still, completely theoretical.
I think you missed multiplying the 30 point top-row ring score of the two autonomous rings (which you included under "AUTONOMOUS RINGS") by the weighted ring bonus (of 1.2), so there should be 36 more theoretical points to be had:

1727 + 36 = 1763 grand total.
Reply With Quote
  #14   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 10-09-2012, 13:15
MattRain MattRain is offline
AZ FTC AF, FTC #2844 and FTC #8640
FRC #1492 (Team Caution)
Team Role: RoboCoach
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Rookie Year: 2008
Location: Chandler, Arizona
Posts: 318
MattRain has a brilliant futureMattRain has a brilliant futureMattRain has a brilliant futureMattRain has a brilliant futureMattRain has a brilliant futureMattRain has a brilliant futureMattRain has a brilliant futureMattRain has a brilliant futureMattRain has a brilliant futureMattRain has a brilliant futureMattRain has a brilliant future
Re: [FTC]: Ring It Up! Scoring Potential

The heights for the pegs, corner goal, and dispeneser were just re-released in the Field Set-Up Guide. 18" for the low pegs, corner goal, and dispenser, 31" for the middle peg, and 44" for the top peg, according to FIRST.
Reply With Quote
  #15   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 15-09-2012, 00:53
Tom G.'s Avatar
Tom G. Tom G. is offline
Registered User
FTC #6220
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: seattle
Posts: 1
Tom G. is an unknown quantity at this point
Post Re: [FTC]: Ring It Up! Scoring Potential

this is how i count the highest possible score:

score for one donut on each peg:180 pts (90 per side) (this uses 18 donuts leaving only the weighted)

score for line bonuses:30*8*2=480 pts

score for auto ring placement on top row: 30 (for two auto rings)

with 6 weighted rings is a 120%

so 675 + 810= 1485 pts

and with the 100 pt bonus for auto rings on IR column and 145 pts for lifting 24 inches (neither of these are affected by the weighted ring bonus) makes:1763 points by my count.

I think joachim was right.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 13:18.

The Chief Delphi Forums are sponsored by Innovation First International, Inc.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi