Go to Post If winning that individual match is more important to you than being there in the first place, then I believe you've got your priorities in the wrong spot. - Tom Bottiglieri [more]
Home
Go Back   Chief Delphi > Technical > Technical Discussion
CD-Media   CD-Spy  
portal register members calendar search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read FAQ rules

 
 
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #7   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 10-09-2012, 13:17
GCentola's Avatar
GCentola GCentola is offline
Strategical Tactitian
AKA: Garrick
no team (SparX)
Team Role: Alumni
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Rookie Year: 2010
Location: Webster
Posts: 383
GCentola has much to be proud ofGCentola has much to be proud ofGCentola has much to be proud ofGCentola has much to be proud ofGCentola has much to be proud ofGCentola has much to be proud ofGCentola has much to be proud ofGCentola has much to be proud of
Re: Castor/Swerve Drive

Quote:
Originally Posted by LeelandS View Post

If you DO want to go with Swerve, there are a few decisions you have to make. Namely, motor allocation. You could go with each module steered by its own motor, or you could chain a few together (2 and 2). That's how 1126 did their prototype chassis. That turned into 2 and 1 and 1 for Championships (2 chained together, 2 are independently driven). Now they are working to make it totally independent. I'm not exactly sure what the advantage is to making it all independent, but I'd imagine the modules would rotate faster and easier. It's also heavier and a little more complicated. So keep that in mind.

-Leeland
If I recall correctly, we tested the 2-1-1 on the prototype swerve but did not find any significant advantages to try and change it on the actual robot. The only change to our swerve in St. Louis was the Colson wheels. I guess, when one of our modules came off during a match, we did have 2 chained together and one independent, but that was unintentional

There was a team of people that worked over the summer to convert the swerve to 4 independently steered modules. Originally, that is how we wanted to build the 2012 robot, but the shooter team grabbed a window motor for the turret. Having 4 independently steered modules seems to be the better way to go in terms of programming, mobility, maneuverability etc. Last I checked, it is mechanically complete and is being reprogrammed.

Second, there are loads of presentations, threads, objective tables etc out there on these decisions. I will try to summarize them into this: build a swerve drive because you have gone through the thought process and decided it is worth the challenge and will offer you a benefit during gameplay. Do not build it (for the competition season) because you really just want to try it or you think it is cool. If you do want it, make sure you prototyped it first. 6 weeks isn't nearly enough time to design a swerve drive from scratch and do it well (especially when the best swerve drives have been perfected over years).


Garrick
__________________
GO SparX on 3!!!!!

Check us out at:
http://www.gosparx.org
http://www.facebook.com/SparX1126
I Love Two Pencil Designs!
 


Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:15.

The Chief Delphi Forums are sponsored by Innovation First International, Inc.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi