Go to Post I saw Dave Lavery on the Webcast. And he winked at me! - Tetraman [more]
Home
Go Back   Chief Delphi > FIRST > General Forum
CD-Media   CD-Spy  
portal register members calendar search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read FAQ rules

 
 
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #18   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 25-09-2012, 17:58
ToddF's Avatar
ToddF ToddF is offline
mechanical engineer
AKA: Todd Ferrante
FRC #2363 (Triple Helix)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Rookie Year: 2011
Location: Newport News, VA
Posts: 597
ToddF has a reputation beyond reputeToddF has a reputation beyond reputeToddF has a reputation beyond reputeToddF has a reputation beyond reputeToddF has a reputation beyond reputeToddF has a reputation beyond reputeToddF has a reputation beyond reputeToddF has a reputation beyond reputeToddF has a reputation beyond reputeToddF has a reputation beyond reputeToddF has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Lithion-Ion Batteries

I'm a fairly new mentor, so some of my thoughts may not be as seasoned as the veteran folks out there. I'm seeing some assumptions in some of the responses that I don't understand.

There seems to be an assumption that for something to be legal for use on a FIRST robot, 1) its performance needs to be completely characterized, 2) it needs to be supplied to all teams in the kit of parts, and 3) it replaces whatever components were previously legal.

Where I can see how this MIGHT apply to control system components running software, I don't see why it should apply to things like actuators. I don't see a downside in allowing brushless motors and drivers to be included in the list of options we consider. Maybe they aren't right for certain applications, but for others, they might be. Why not allow teams who want to use them to save money to do so?

AdamHeard rightly pointed out that the Jaguars (and Victors) are far oversized for the shooter wheels. So why do the rules limit us to using those and only those motor drivers? Why not allow teams to use other options?

Reading between the lines, it seems that at some point in the past, cheap motor drivers were not available, so in order to ensure a supply of reasonably priced drives, FIRST worked with suppliers to come up with custom motor controllers. To ensure that the market was large enough to keep prices down, they made rules that limited teams from using anything else. I would argue that the commercial marketplace for inexpensive motors, drives, and controllers has caught up and bypassed the needs of FIRST. Inexpensive, rugged motors and drives, both brushed and brushless, are commonly available in the RC marketplace. For the $285 cost of the cRIO FRC II Controller, you can buy EIGHT Raspberry Pi computers (I have an order of three arriving today.)

During build season, I'm all about doing the best you can with the limited set of components allowed. But, with cheaper, possibly better, components available in the commercial marketplace, why not expand the rules to allow us to use them?

Again, I apologize for hijacking the OP's thread. If anyone knows how to split this topic off into a new thread, please do so...
__________________
Todd F.
mentor, FIRST team 2363, Triple Helix
Photo gallery
video channel
Triple Helix mobile
Reply With Quote
 


Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 17:27.

The Chief Delphi Forums are sponsored by Innovation First International, Inc.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi