paper: 418's Mini-Encabulator

[Jimmy Nichols]

DO you plan on mass producing these for sale on Andymark.com?

I know we could have used one last year.

[RogerR]

For those of us with more visual learning styles, check this video for a bit more background on the turbo encabulator (a predecessor):

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rLDgQg6bq7o

[Andrew Schuetze]

Originally Posted by RogerR

For those of us with more visual learning styles, check this video for a bit more background on the turbo encabulator (a predecessor):

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rLDgQg6bq7o

an updated version of the original device.
http://youtu.be/fIVXw4n2g_0

[Chris is me]

I finally decided to give this a try, but it was a new moon, so I didn't have much success. Is the logarithmic casing really essential?

[PAR_WIG1350]

Originally Posted by Chris is me

I finally decided to give this a try, but it was a new moon, so I didn't have much success. Is the logarithmic casing really essential?

I heard somewhere of experiments with quartic casings, but there were mixed results.

[flameout]

Originally Posted by Chris is me

I finally decided to give this a try, but it was a new moon, so I didn't have much success. Is the logarithmic casing really essential?

Originally Posted by PAR_WIG1350

I heard somewhere of experiments with quartic casings, but there were mixed results.

You can use one of a custom Taylor'd series of polynomial casings. In order to conserve such advanced designs as the lotus-odeltoid designs (not to mention the quartic ones), it takes four orders to acquire such technology.

The disadvantage of using such a case is poor performance during trigonometric skor motions. If these are required, then a truly logarithmic casing is, in fact, essential.

[IKE]

Originally Posted by flameout

You can use one of a custom Taylor'd series of polynomial casings. In order to conserve such advanced designs as the lotus-odeltoid designs (not to mention the quartic ones), it takes four orders to acquire such technology.

The disadvantage of using such a case is poor performance during trigonometric skor motions. If these are required, then a truly logarithmic casing is, in fact, essential.

Does it really take 4 orders to acquire one? Sounds like an E commerce issue. Or do these suffer from the 775 bb issue where 3/4 casings are short.

[PAR_WIG1350]

Originally Posted by IKE

Does it really take 4 orders to acquire one? Sounds like an E commerce issue. Or do these suffer from the 775 bb issue where 3/4 casings are short.

Originally Posted by Wikipedia

Taylor's theorem gives an approximation of a k times differentiable function around a given point by a k-th order Taylor-polynomial

I believe he was using a different definition of "order".

[DonRotolo]

Originally Posted by Chris is me

Is the logarithmic casing really essential?

Not really but it's the easiest.
What kind of memory did you use? It does specify Write-Only Memory, which is getting hard to find these days now that NatSemi has gone to the 23 nanometer process.

[PAR_WIG1350]

Originally Posted by DonRotolo

Not really but it's the easiest.
What kind of memory did you use? It does specify Write-Only Memory, which is getting hard to find these days now that NatSemi has gone to the 23 nanometer process.

Don't be silly, hardly anything ever used write only memory anyways. It's as if it simply vanished into thin air only moments after it was first created. It is much more likely that it uses Heisenberg memory, but I can't be certain about that.

[Jimmy Nichols]

Deleted

[PAR_WIG1350]

Originally Posted by Jimmy Nichols

Has anyone found issues with the logarithmic casing? We found that the cosinusoidal tangial waves that it creates interruption the dynamic goinometric continium. We tried a sinusoidal cotangial wave supressor but we got mixed results.

Tangial isn't even a word, I think you mean tangential, also, even with that correction, none of what you said suggests you have any experience with encabulators of any sort. Also, you grammar and syntax skills seem to suddenly disappear in the second sentence only to return in the third, typically a sign of stopping to look stuff up mid-sentence only to forget where one left off.