|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Using timing belts horizontally
Though it seems Gravity would pull it down to stretch the belt it is Extremely Hard and nearly impossible for them to stretch, little own stretch due to gravity. You will not have an issue with belts being horizontal.
|
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Using timing belts horizontally
You can plan to run them in any orientation you want as long as you have a means of tensioning them, either with movable shaft location(s) or a tensioner/ idler. As long as they are not slack and have reasonable tension (and of course the shafts are well parallel), the pulley flanges will keep the belt tracking. Only a loose belt would climb over the pulley flanges from gravity.
|
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Using timing belts horizontally
Quote:
|
|
#4
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Using timing belts horizontally
I've been running horizontal timing belts for a little bit, off a FRC robot. I don't think you would need it quite this tight, but for the application I've been using them in, if the driving motor started to turn, the belt needed to start to move immediately. If there was delay, I'd hunt down and remove the slack.
For an FRC robot, you don't have to have them that tight, but you still don't want much slack. |
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Using timing belts horizontally
You wouldn't happen to have any pictures would you?
|
|
#6
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Using timing belts horizontally
I don't think so. I'd have to get them the next time I'm in the shop (the best part of a week).
BUT! of the three belts on any one of the machines they're on, 2 are horizontal (the third is on horizontal axles) and only one of those is a continuous belt. That one has a slidable tensioner--set and forget--and is used to drive a pair of leadscrews. I've seen minor stretch and occasional loosening. The non-continuous belts are tensioned by pulling more of the belt through the clamps that hold it in place. For the application, I need them that tight--they're being driven by a trio of stepper motors, and need accuracy as tight as possible. But with them a little bit slacker, I can still get acceptable results. An FRC robot could go slacker still, but not by much. |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Using timing belts horizontally
We used a horizontal high speed belt (direct to a cim, speeding up an impeller) without problems for Breakaway. 1 pulley had flanges, this kept the belt from wandering.
|
|
#8
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Using timing belts horizontally
1717 didn't seem to have any problems, but then again, they have access to magic.
|
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Using timing belts horizontally
Not knowing the geometry of your situation its impossible to describe exactly how much tension is right. There are rules of thumb for the amount of deflection when pushing on the belt from the side, but this depends on the belt arrangement, width, torque, etc. The least amount of tension which transmits your load reliably and does not skip under max. load is the right amount. Any tension that is wrapping the pulleys securely and not slipping teeth will also keep the belt tracking. Use a method that is adjustable and just experiment with it. When possible I always prefer an adjustable shaft location with no tensioners vs. tensioner idlers, as idlers add moving parts and complexity and subtract from your efficiency. If you use an idler and are transmitting power in both directions, it should have a fixed location. Spring loaded or "floating" idlers are for power in one direction, and are located on the slack side of the belt path.
Last edited by jspatz1 : 30-09-2012 at 16:30. |
|
#10
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Using timing belts horizontally
The manufacturer has a specification for tension. That would be the best choice. A floating idler may not provide enough tension for a severe application such as a drivetrain because it won't let the belt be tight enough
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|