|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2013 SVR
Quote:
I wonder if any of the middle level teams (for SVR anyway) that we "shouldn't forget" will go for a defensive strategy to try to get with a winning alliance. SVR tends to be very offensive, and I'm interested to see if and how having so many powerhouse teams will change qualifications and eliminations play. |
|
#2
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: 2013 SVR
Quote:
1) Trying to get on the winning alliance as a defensive robot for these teams is going to be a bigger gamble than just trying to build the best robot they can. They build quality robots, drive well and have good game sense, they would get snatched up before they make it back around. We're assuming that without their solid offensive play in qualifiers, the powerhouses will easily get to the top of the rankings. This also leaves the entire offensive field shallower, which means that the top few alliances will have all the offense, and leave the lower half picking up as much defense as possible...and they'll take these guys first. 2) With the addition of at least 118 and 148, things get a little tougher to guarantee in the rankings. Like a stacked Championship division, the top contenders often beat each other up in qualifiers. That opens up a lot of possibilities for the 1868's, 192's and others that are consistently reaching the 2nd-5th seeds to leapfrog over a few. Maybe one of them gets a chance to pick up 118 or 148...or 254. Now it's a whole new ballgame. But they probably don't get that chance if they go defensive 3) Most of these teams attend multiple events, and they're usually considered favorites for the medal at those, because they are quite good. Would you sacrifice your chances at your other events to try and get on the winning alliance at SVR as defense? 4) Let's say, hypothetically, one or more of the teams in question does choose to go defensive, and manages to sneak by and get themselves on the winning alliance. They make it to champs...and then what? Very few purely defensive robots ever make CMP eliminations. The defensive robots we see at champs are almost always** robots that have some offensive capability and are just really well driven with good drivetrains. These teams build good drivetrains every year, and drive it well every year, so they're only more likely to get picked at champs if they design a healthy amount of offense in. *1280 is not currently signed up for SVR, but hopefully they get in via waitlist... **Yes, of course there are exceptions, or robots which are specialized in a part of the game that's not considered primary offense, but they are few and far between. There's upwards of 350 teams at champs, the odds are not in their favor. |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2013 SVR
Seems like it's going to be amazing as always. The Fembots will see you all there!
> insert advertisement for the Sacramento regional here < |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 2013 SVR
It's a shame Vegas and SVR wound up week 6
The High Rollers were originally planning on returning to one of our favorite regionals and we were bummed when we learned SVR was moved to week 6. We can only imagine what it would have been like if we could have joined in the fun![]() |
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2013 SVR
I think "defensive" is a somewhat poor term - I like "utility" a lot better as it covers more strategies and robot designs. Utility robots are often "defensive" but limiting yourself to that title really cuts back on your options.
It's also totally possible to build a utility robot that seeds high enough to be an alliance captain, either via new seeding rules or by smart strategy. The trick is to add just enough functionality to either win outright or enable easy wins - even if you can't yourself put up triple digit scores. I think a lot of the teams that have been mentioned are of a caliber where they can produce great offensive or hybrid threats, but more utility robots at a regional are never a bad thing. |
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2013 SVR
Talk about a rumble the Pink Team and the Greybots are joining in the week six fun. Is this going to be fun?
|
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 2013 SVR
Fun for the viewers! I'm really excited to watch SVR.
|
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 2013 SVR
LVR might be worth switching back and forth with
![]() |
|
#9
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: 2013 SVR
Agreed.
Maybe in the SVR pits we should have the LVR webcasts.... and vice verca ![]() |
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2013 SVR
Wow. Can you say "stacked?" SVR will easily be four times as competitive as it was last year.
|
|
#11
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2013 SVR
I love tough regionals. I'm extremely happy that 148 will be in one of the toughest shoot-outs of the year. It will be great to see some of my oldest FIRST friends, and get the chance to hopefully make some new ones.
It is awesome to see so many "Einstein" teams from the past few years in once place. Maybe this is finally the event to give MSC a run for their money? -John |
|
#12
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2013 SVR
Quote:
![]() |
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 2013 SVR
|
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 2013 SVR
I really like watching these types of events with lots of great teams from all over coming into one place. It's a great opportunity for those teams that don't get to experience Championships often to meet a better variety of teams. I hope FIRST keeps something in place so we can still have events like this in the future as everyone in the US moves to Districts/Regions over the next few years. Maybe just keep a couple 'open' events in large cities near the borders of regions that normally don't get to play together?
|
|
#15
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2013 SVR
Nuttyman,
It's time to give everyone a run down of the teams that are competing. Any favorites to run the gauntlet or will the defense be so tight that it will be a scheduling Gods decision? The kids on 4543 are going big with a shooter and something special for the big guns. Last edited by roystur44 : 01-04-2013 at 12:55. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|