Go to Post I'll toss this out to stir up the pot: if you need double precision floats for your FRC software, you should re-think what you're doing. - Ether [more]
Home
Go Back   Chief Delphi > FIRST > General Forum
CD-Media   CD-Spy  
portal register members calendar search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read FAQ rules

 
Reply
 
Thread Tools Rating: Thread Rating: 2 votes, 5.00 average. Display Modes
  #1   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 03-10-2012, 23:01
LeelandS's Avatar
LeelandS LeelandS is offline
Robots don't quit, and neither do I
AKA: Leeland
FRC #1405 (Finney Falcons)
Team Role: Tactician
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Rookie Year: 2005
Location: Webster, NY
Posts: 545
LeelandS has a reputation beyond reputeLeelandS has a reputation beyond reputeLeelandS has a reputation beyond reputeLeelandS has a reputation beyond reputeLeelandS has a reputation beyond reputeLeelandS has a reputation beyond reputeLeelandS has a reputation beyond reputeLeelandS has a reputation beyond reputeLeelandS has a reputation beyond reputeLeelandS has a reputation beyond reputeLeelandS has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Advantages to a long bot?

Robot orientation is generally a game decision. It usually comes down to, is being wide worth the cost of stability. In 2012, with the triple balance being such an important game piece, many teams went with a wide orientation robot to allow the triple balance to be more possible.

In most other games, there is no significant advantage to a wide robot. In fact, in most games, it could be an issue. Several games in recent years (I'm thinking 07, 08, 10 and 11) saw many long robots because the stability was an advantage; it allowed for some robot designs that required forward/backward stability. For example, in 07/11, many robots had elevators. When the elevators went up, it changed the robots center of gravity to up and to a side. On a wide robot, this is dangerous, as the robot will be more easily tilted to one side and subsequently tipped. Likewise, a robot with an arm would be in even more danger. The CoG would be elevated, and set outside the robot's perimeter, which could very easily tip the wide robot over.

In a game like 2008, a similar concept is applied. The two major game designs (a ball elevator and a catapult of some kind) would have been difficult on a wide base. Like in 2007, an elevator makes the CoG elevate and go to a side, especially when those big trackballs are elevated to 6'6" above the ground. On a catapult device, the force of the ball launching could generate a great deal of force to one side of the robot, which could tip up or tip over a wide orientation drive base.

In 2010, the bumps dividing the field were significantly larger than this year's; one foot tall, if I remember correctly. I saw some wide robots do it well (Team 86 doesn't count...), but without a doubt, robots without forward/backward stability were much more prone to tipping.

Most often, there is no need for a wide robot. In 2006, 2009 and 2012, robots with a wide drive system could have some kind intake on the wide side to aid in game piece acquisition. However, in most other years, the decrease in stability is a hindrance. Which is why most years, you see the number of long robots far outnumbers the wide.
__________________
My heart will forever lie with SparX
1126: 2008 - 2011; Where it All Began.
1405: 2013 - Present; A Wanderer is Born.

Work hard, play hard. And maybe someday...
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 17:36.

The Chief Delphi Forums are sponsored by Innovation First International, Inc.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi