|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Question about the Chairman's Award
The last time a FIRST team went to the White House was February 7, 2012. There were students representing FLL, FTC, and FRC.
Unfortunately there was no representation from the prior Champion Chairman's team, the Hawaiian Kids. That was a big mistake on the part of FIRST, no doubt. If the White House event is done annually, then the next time should be February. There is no public understanding or knowledge at this time that this will happen. There are many factors that can influence if / when it will happen again. |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Question about the Chairman's Award
Quote:
![]() |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Question about the Chairman's Award
Seems like it would be nice to establish a tradition of this though, no? Although it might realistically be hard for that to happen.
|
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Question about the Chairman's Award
The White House selects based on the recommendations given by FIRST.
|
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Question about the Chairman's Award
As Ed has mentioned, and from a few sources that I heard from, the decision on who attended was a recommendation from FIRST. Regardless of whether we were to get an invite or not earlier this year, I do hope that 1114 gets that opportunity, should FIRST teams visit the White House again.
|
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Question about the Chairman's Award
Well to a degree we are both correct. The decision comes down to the White House of who is invited.
|
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Question about the Chairman's Award
but if FIRST doesn't make the recommendation...
|
|
#8
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Question about the Chairman's Award
Quote:
-Brando |
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Question about the Chairman's Award
The year MOE went to the White House (along with the equivalent FLL and FTC winners) was a one-off event. Dean had a meeting with President Bush, so it was arranged to have the three winners all give a quick demo of their robots at the WH (and photo op). And, later that day, to a congressional reception in another building (although there weren't many congressmen there). We were extremely lucky to have the planets aligned the proper way to get a chance to visit the White House.
We were informed the evening that we received the Chairman's Award by FIRST that we would be going to the WH a few weeks afterwards. But we weren't allowed to tell anyone outside our immediate families for security reasons. We were limited in numbers, and all had to get a security check in advance. Funny story. We had to deliver the robot a few days early so that the Secret Service could check it out, as Bush was going to drive it himself. They couldn't fit in through the door of the room they had planned to store it, so it spent the weekend in Laura Bush's office (who was out of town). More to the point, I agree that all CA winners should go to DC. Daisy went as part of a large "science fair" type event where winners of many different STEM type competitions were present. That is something they should arrange every year. |
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Question about the Chairman's Award
Yes, the year MOE went was a very special event.
In October 2010 and February 2012 President Obama had the White House Science Fair. The October event was MUCH larger than the MOE event. The recent February event was MUCH larger than the earlier October event. At the February very few students got to interact with the President. Most were at some distance. There were about 50 STEM organizations represented with about 100 student attendees. The adults were kept away in the Eisenhower building until the Secret Service / White House staff allowed them to walk over to the White House, and that was after the President had left the event. I don't think the President talked to more than 5 STEM organizations directly. In my opinion there is a good likelihood of the White House science fair being repeated, but the probability of a team repeating the MOE experience is probably very very low. However it could happen again. I most enjoyed talking to Aneesh Chopra, CTO of the US. That was a nice part of the trip. |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Question about the Chairman's Award
Quote:
(Though not our head of state, since that is still Her Majesty Elizabeth the Second, by the Grace of God of the United Kingdom, Canada and Her other Realms and Territories Queen, Head of the Commonwealth, Defender of the Faith. And yes, that IS actually her 'style' in Canada.) |
|
#12
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Question about the Chairman's Award
24 Sussex is a residence.
The White House and 10 Downing are simultaneously a residence and where the the business of the executive are conducted. The more appropriate venue in Canada should be Langevin Block, the official place the Prime Minister conducts business, and is more like the White House in that regards, but that is just my 2 Canadian pennies |
|
#13
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Question about the Chairman's Award
Quote:
Sounds like you guys got what I meant tho. |
|
#14
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Question about the Chairman's Award
Quote:
We have not received an invitation to the White House, but would naturally be thrilled to do so. It would be an unimaginable honour. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|