Go to Post Being a good engineer isn't all about engineering. It's about being able to use engineering for a practical application, and to successfully communicate your research or development results to people who aren't engineers - Jon Stratis [more]
Home
Go Back   Chief Delphi > FIRST > General Forum
CD-Media   CD-Spy  
portal register members calendar search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read FAQ rules

 
 
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #16   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 05-11-2012, 22:10
ehfeinberg's Avatar
ehfeinberg ehfeinberg is offline
Registered User
AKA: Evan
FRC #0449 (Blair Robot Project)
Team Role: Alumni
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Rookie Year: 2011
Location: Silver Spring, MD
Posts: 232
ehfeinberg has a brilliant futureehfeinberg has a brilliant futureehfeinberg has a brilliant futureehfeinberg has a brilliant futureehfeinberg has a brilliant futureehfeinberg has a brilliant futureehfeinberg has a brilliant futureehfeinberg has a brilliant futureehfeinberg has a brilliant futureehfeinberg has a brilliant futureehfeinberg has a brilliant future
Re: 2002 Robot Design

Quote:
Originally Posted by EricH View Post
60's strategy was simple: drop a tether at the start of the match (I think it was shock-corded segments) and go racing out to grab two goals and drag them into their scoring area. That's when the fun began. They'd lift both goals, increasing their total weight to something like 490 lbs--try breaking traction with that! Then when someone tried to push one of the goals back into the neutral zone, or to their own zone, the merry-go-round started turning. And turning. And turning. For the rest of the match--or until whoever it was got bored and went to bug someone else, like whoever had the third goal. The human players would then let fly, if a robot didn't load the goals first, and try to score a few.
I don't suppose someone has a video, I would love to see that!

Quote:
Originally Posted by EricH View Post
Now, with a flop-bot, it's normal stance is both vertical (starting configuration) and horizontal (playing configuration). Obviously, bumpers would be required in vertical configuration, as otherwise G01 comes into play (violation of R29). With me so far?
I guess you could still argue that it's 'playing' configuration is not the normal configuration, and thus you would not need bumpers. <sarcasm> Such a shame that FIRST does not want us to 'lawyer' the rules. </sarcasm>
__________________
“They’ve done studies, you know. 60 percent of the time, it works every time.” — Brian Fantana
"You miss 100% of the shots you don't take." - Wayne Gretzky
"Simplicity is the ultimate form of sophistication" - Leonardo da Vinci
Reply With Quote
 


Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 20:37.

The Chief Delphi Forums are sponsored by Innovation First International, Inc.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi