|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Any restrictions on engines?
The best explanation I've seen basically goes as follows:
All engines are motors, but not all motors are engines. To be an engine, it must be a machine/mechanism (i.e., moving parts) that serves as an energy source. Examples: Electric Motor - It has moving parts, but the energy source (the battery) is not part of it, thus it isn't an engine. Combustion Engine - It has moving parts and gasoline is burned inside, therefore it IS an engine. Solid Rocket Motor - It serves as an energy source (burning fuel inside of itself), but it has no moving parts, thus it isn't an engine. Liquid Rocket Engine - It serves as an energy source (burning fuel inside of itself), and there are tons of moving parts (turbomachinery), therefore it IS an engine. |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Any restrictions on engines?
Quote:
Electric Engine - It has moving parts and electrons are used inside, therefore it IS an engine. |
|
#3
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Any restrictions on engines?
We use the engines of our imagination on the robot all the time.
FIRST being an engine of change after all. Last edited by Mark McLeod : 15-11-2012 at 16:12. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|