|
|
|
| I lessthanthree you. |
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#16
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Any restrictions on engines?
A steam or sterling engine would burn some material which would then heat water. On the other hand, I do like the idea of a pressure change being used to do work as part if the definition. That's probbably a more widely acceptable definition.
|
|
#17
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Any restrictions on engines?
Quote:
|
|
#18
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Any restrictions on engines?
The best explanation I've seen basically goes as follows:
All engines are motors, but not all motors are engines. To be an engine, it must be a machine/mechanism (i.e., moving parts) that serves as an energy source. Examples: Electric Motor - It has moving parts, but the energy source (the battery) is not part of it, thus it isn't an engine. Combustion Engine - It has moving parts and gasoline is burned inside, therefore it IS an engine. Solid Rocket Motor - It serves as an energy source (burning fuel inside of itself), but it has no moving parts, thus it isn't an engine. Liquid Rocket Engine - It serves as an energy source (burning fuel inside of itself), and there are tons of moving parts (turbomachinery), therefore it IS an engine. |
|
#19
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Any restrictions on engines?
I love how the trolling thread has been derailed into something useful.
Let's make a list: Motors Electric motor Rocket motor Molecular motor Motorcycle Motor neuron Engines Gasoline engine Jet engine Steam engine Stirling engine Search engine I remember reading a model rocketry book which was adamant that the propulsion was a "rocket motor", and not a "rocket engine". But I see now that Estes calls them "engines". Wikipedia treats "motor" and "engine" as effectively synonymous, at least until someone here goes and edits the article. |
|
#20
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Any restrictions on engines?
Quote:
All I know is I have an outboard engine on my motorboat... ![]() |
|
#21
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Any restrictions on engines?
Quote:
|
|
#22
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Any restrictions on engines?
I'm betting FIRST will allow you to choose between a search engine or a siege engine. I'm digging siege engines. We can create FRC trebuchets to play Aim High all over again.
|
|
#23
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Any restrictions on engines?
Can we use the batteries as counterweight? Or maybe the pneumatic storage tanks (as long as they're not painted)?
|
|
#24
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Any restrictions on engines?
Well, the search engine does throw a kink into the definition. I think I will call google a search motor from now on.
|
|
#25
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Any restrictions on engines?
So does a siege engine! I don't steam a old train with a steam engine, but I siege a city with a siege engine.
|
|
#26
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Any restrictions on engines?
Quote:
Electric Engine - It has moving parts and electrons are used inside, therefore it IS an engine. |
|
#27
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Any restrictions on engines?
We use the engines of our imagination on the robot all the time.
FIRST being an engine of change after all. Last edited by Mark McLeod : 15-11-2012 at 16:12. |
|
#28
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Any restrictions on engines?
Quote:
But would that make any gun or bow an engine? |
|
#29
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Any restrictions on engines?
Obvious troll is obvious.
Had me going for a second though. Well done. -Nick |
|
#30
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Any restrictions on engines?
Quote:
But not on the robot. ![]() |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|