|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#14
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Request a Re-Write of the Wire Color Rule for 2013.
Quote:
Quote:
I don't understand the points about inspection, as if you really had a standard, all of the robots would follow the same color code. It would even be more understood. I was not going for this strict standard in original post, but now as I look at the colors, and the comments, I really have an issue with white being used as a positive. In the US and most other nations, white is not used as a positive. We wired the bot with the white with blue tracer on the positive, and blue on the negative to meet the spec. The issue I have with that, and the reason for the post, was it is completely wrong, to what these kids will find in a couple of years after FIRST. I am glad that Andrew posted, but as a student that came up through the FIRST program, now goes to Kettering, and works at Chrysler. There is not a single application he will come across, where white will be a positive. NEC says so. (66.9 robot control falls under this spec, but obviously, I wouldn't make the case that an FRC robot is a control panel, and Andrew might, as it appears that anything mobile doesn't fall under any standards.) That just seems wrong, to me. I think it is a disservice. For the humor... For the record the kids didn't mind, and the electrons still flowed unknowingly. http://xkcd.com/927/ |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|