|
#301
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Registration 2013
Quote:
|
|
#302
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Registration 2013
Quote:
|
|
#303
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Registration 2013
Quote:
16, 118, 148, 233, 359, 1114, 2056 |
|
#304
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Registration 2013
3 of those 7 teams are all going to be at SVR week six...wow
|
|
#305
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Registration 2013
These are not regional only teams. They are attending champs.
|
|
#306
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Registration 2013
He means all regionals+CMP, as opposed to teams in a district system.
|
|
#307
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Registration 2013
This regional better have a webcast, otherwise, I would consider flying across the country to see it (only mostly joking haha). A showdown between 254, 233, 148, 118, 973 and 971 should be absolutely epic! Not to mention the other 52 teams there!
For some interesting stats (note: taken from FIRST site which tends to have some erroneous data, but should be close enough). Between these six teams there are: 55 Regional Wins 21 Regional Finalists 14 Division Wins 5 Championship Wins Incredible! |
|
#308
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Registration 2013
An interesting point is raised: what would be an equitable method of allocating CMP slots to a district? Right now we have only 2 district systems, but what happens when there are a dozen? Are districts like FIM doomed to be forever frozen to three regionals' worth of slots?
C'mon, we're smart people, surely we can solve this? |
|
#309
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Registration 2013
Once everyone is at a district system, I say we go by proportions. These proportions can change throughout time.
For example MI has 207 out of 2560 teams (8.086%). Besides the teams that already qualified for things such as Einstein 2012, HoF, sustaining teams, etc, there is 367 slots. In a perfect world, we should also get that percentage of teams at CMP. This year, we would get about 30 teams plus pre-qualified teams. That number looks much better than the 18 we currently get. Now on the other hand, CA would get fewer spots. Under that same system, they would have 31 spots. This is fewer than their current 36. Last edited by Littleboy : 15-12-2012 at 21:54. |
|
#310
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Registration 2013
Quote:
|
|
#311
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Registration 2013
Quote:
Now, when there are so many districts that 6*regions is greater than the reasonable capacity of Championship...we'll have to have a long look in the mirror. |
|
#312
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Registration 2013
Quote:
You could add two columns fairly easily, I think. One that shows the number of CMP slots allocated to each area now, and one that shows the difference between an all-district allocation and the one we have now. |
|
#313
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Registration 2013
I will do that now should be done by tomorrow morning the earliest
Last edited by MARS_James : 15-12-2012 at 22:30. |
|
#314
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Registration 2013
There is (and has been for several days now) 207 teams in MI. That extra team would bump us up to 30 teams.
Also, in CA, there are 6 regionals, not 4. |
|
#315
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Registration 2013
Quote:
So most gained: Michigan: 11 Mexico and South America: 6 Most Lost: Maine, New Hampshire, Vermont, Quebec: 7 Arizona, Nevada, Utah: 7 Ontario: 6 |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|