|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#16
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: No Coopertition bonus?
Quote:
At Alamo we had a team get their whole Alliance disqualified because a team that didn't pass inspection sent their human player out and he refused to leave the field when he was told to by his partners. We found out afterwards that the student was told by his mentor if he came back to the pit before the match was through he was going to be walking home. Way to to inspire the kids. |
|
#17
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: No Coopertition bonus?
Quote:
Quote:
![]() |
|
#18
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: No Coopertition bonus?
Quote:
|
|
#19
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: No Coopertition bonus?
Well I'm glad you have an appreciation of poorly thought out awards.
|
|
#20
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: No Coopertition bonus?
Quote:
Clearly I've spent too much time over the past several years focusing on the Robot rules and not enough on the Tournament rules. |
|
#21
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: No Coopertition bonus?
Quote:
Wait...WHAT??? Where did you ever here me complain? I simply pointed out that there is no seeding bonus for coopertition this year, when in the past they have made it more important every year. I didn't give a positive or negative opinion of that fact, just pointed it out. Just for completeness, I was never a fan of using anything for seeding other than the performance of the teams. I believe we are playing a game, and in general, teams that play the game better than others should be rewarded. I LIKE the fact that there is no coopertition bonus, so I wouldn't "complain" about it. By the way, there is nothing this year to stop you from "sabotaging other teams by sandbagging a match". You could still intentionally lose a match and deny QS points to two other teams, but I can't think of a scenario where that would be acceptable to anyone. Last edited by martin417 : 07-01-2013 at 13:26. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|