Go to Post That sound you hear is a student on the mechanical team trying to get out of the shipping crate you closed too early. - Al Skierkiewicz [more]
Home
Go Back   Chief Delphi > FIRST > General Forum
CD-Media   CD-Spy  
portal register members calendar search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read FAQ rules

 
Reply
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #16   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 10-01-2013, 12:08
JB987 JB987 is offline
Registered User
AKA: Joe Barry
FRC #0987 (HIGH ROLLERS)
Team Role: Coach
 
Join Date: May 2006
Rookie Year: 2002
Location: LAS VEGAS
Posts: 1,177
JB987 has a reputation beyond reputeJB987 has a reputation beyond reputeJB987 has a reputation beyond reputeJB987 has a reputation beyond reputeJB987 has a reputation beyond reputeJB987 has a reputation beyond reputeJB987 has a reputation beyond reputeJB987 has a reputation beyond reputeJB987 has a reputation beyond reputeJB987 has a reputation beyond reputeJB987 has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Pyramid rule clarification

Quote:
Originally Posted by joshjet View Post
I'm sorry, but I guess I still don't understand completely. Does this mean that we would be unable to reach directly to the second bar while sitting on the ground?
Yes...
__________________
"A genius is just a talented person who does his homework" T. Edison
Reply With Quote
  #17   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 10-01-2013, 13:17
Alan Anderson's Avatar
Alan Anderson Alan Anderson is offline
Software Architect
FRC #0045 (TechnoKats)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Rookie Year: 2004
Location: Kokomo, Indiana
Posts: 9,113
Alan Anderson has a reputation beyond reputeAlan Anderson has a reputation beyond reputeAlan Anderson has a reputation beyond reputeAlan Anderson has a reputation beyond reputeAlan Anderson has a reputation beyond reputeAlan Anderson has a reputation beyond reputeAlan Anderson has a reputation beyond reputeAlan Anderson has a reputation beyond reputeAlan Anderson has a reputation beyond reputeAlan Anderson has a reputation beyond reputeAlan Anderson has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Pyramid rule clarification

Quote:
Originally Posted by joshjet View Post
I'm sorry, but I guess I still don't understand completely. Does this mean that we would be unable to reach directly to the second bar while sitting on the ground?
If you're sitting on the ground, you are in contact with Level 0. If you then touch the second bar, you are in contact with the pyramid in Level 2. Contact in levels 0 and 2 simultaneously invalidates a CLIMB attempt.
Reply With Quote
  #18   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 10-01-2013, 13:48
DjScribbles DjScribbles is offline
Programming Mentor
AKA: Joe S
FRC #2474 (Team Excel)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Rookie Year: 2012
Location: Niles MI
Posts: 284
DjScribbles is a splendid one to beholdDjScribbles is a splendid one to beholdDjScribbles is a splendid one to beholdDjScribbles is a splendid one to beholdDjScribbles is a splendid one to beholdDjScribbles is a splendid one to beholdDjScribbles is a splendid one to beholdDjScribbles is a splendid one to behold
Re: Pyramid rule clarification

The Q&A has cleared up a few points of confusion regarding climbing (one pointed out earlier):

The decision of whether or not a climb is valid/invalid is made based on where the robot makes contact with the pyramid only, not air space *1. Sequential contact means in order, but also not skipping levels *2.

*1
Quote:
Q.Figure 3-4 on page 28/90 shows Level 2 just above the horizontal bar. Since the rule states no
more than two zones why is it (or is it) permissible to hook the pipe while still on the floor and if so
how far into level 2 can you go? Does that include the side pipes?
A.The requirements in Section 3.1.5.2 A and B pertain to the ROBOT'S contact with the PYRAMID
and/or floor within each Level, not the ROBOT'S presence in the physical space of the Level.
*2
Quote:
Q.Can the robot go from the floor to level 2 while climbing the pyramid or does it have to climb to
level 1 first and then level 2? I need clarification
A.Per Section 3.1.5.2, a ROBOT has CLIMBED its PYRAMID if it contacts the PYRAMID and/or the floor (Level 0) in sequential order (Level 0, 1, 2, 3) during ascent. Skipping a level (i.e. going from
the floor directly to Level 2) would not meet the "sequential order" requirement.


The scoring of your robot however, is determined by the lowest air space (zone) is occupies *3, including the bumpers *4.

*3
Quote:
Q.Is the climb score counted by lowest point relative to a horizontal plane at the top of each rung,
or by the lowest point of the robot physically touching the tower. I.E. If an robot is hanging down
into zone 2, but is touching only the steel in zone 3, is his score 20 or 30?
A.Per Section 3.1.5.2, the Level to which a ROBOT has CLIMBED is determined by the lowest point
of the ROBOT (not the lowest point of the ROBOT contacting the PYRAMID).
*4
Quote:
Q.When hanging does the lowest point of the robot include the bumpers?
A.Yes.


Also, while not directly related to the pyramid, Q&A has also stated that the 54" cylinder limit for appendages is always with respect to the ground, so while climbing at a 68deg angle, an appendage that would extend outside the 54" cylinder when flat on the ground may be used *5. Conversely, the height requirement of 60"/84" is always taken with respect to the base of the robot *6.

*5
Quote:
Q.Is the 54 inch envelope diameter (figure 3-5) orientation sensitive ie is its axis always vertical
regardless of the robots axis ie such as when the robot climbs?
A.The vertical cylinder specified in G23 is not coupled with the ROBOT's orientation and is always
vertical.
*6
Quote:
Q.Rule G22 places height restrictions "in relation to the ROBOT." Does this apply to G23 (horizontal
restrictions)? When climbing the pyramid, extending an appendage "out" from the robot but "up" in
space might extend past the cylinder if it is taken relative to the robot, as opposed to the ground.
A.The height requirement in G22 is relative to the ROBOT. The horizontal volume requirement of
G23 is relative to the FIELD (see answer to [Q15]).

A lot of the conclusions I've stated are reinforced by multiple answers to similar questions, I tried to pick the most clear instance, but please check the Q&A if I didn't justify all of my conclusions completely, and if I'm wrong, do correct me
Reply With Quote
  #19   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 10-01-2013, 14:15
nighterfighter nighterfighter is offline
1771 Alum, 1771 Mentor
AKA: Matt B
FRC #1771 (1771)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Rookie Year: 2007
Location: Suwanee/Kennesaw, GA
Posts: 835
nighterfighter has a brilliant futurenighterfighter has a brilliant futurenighterfighter has a brilliant futurenighterfighter has a brilliant futurenighterfighter has a brilliant futurenighterfighter has a brilliant futurenighterfighter has a brilliant futurenighterfighter has a brilliant futurenighterfighter has a brilliant futurenighterfighter has a brilliant futurenighterfighter has a brilliant future
Re: Pyramid rule clarification

Quote:
Q.Can the robot go from the floor to level 2 while climbing the pyramid or does it have to climb to
level 1 first and then level 2? I need clarification
A.Per Section 3.1.5.2, a ROBOT has CLIMBED its PYRAMID if it contacts the PYRAMID and/or the floor (Level 0) in sequential order (Level 0, 1, 2, 3) during ascent. Skipping a level (i.e. going from
the floor directly to Level 2) would not meet the "sequential order" requirement.
So to play devil's advocate:

Could a robot sit on the floor (Level 0), extend up their arm and touch the bar (level 1), back off the bar (no longer in contact with level 1, but HAS satisfied the requirement of sequential order) then extend to the level 2 bar and attach itself to that bar, while still on the ground, before winching themselves up?

The robot made sequential contact with Level 0 -> Level 1 -> Level 2, but during the time between Level 1 and Level 2, remained in contact with Level 0.
__________________
1771- Programmer, Captain, Drive Team (2009-2012)
4509- Mentor (2013-2015)
1771- Mentor (2015)
Reply With Quote
  #20   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 10-01-2013, 14:31
Jimmy Nichols's Avatar
Jimmy Nichols Jimmy Nichols is offline
Mentor,QCR Planning
FRC #1038 (The Thunderhawks)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Rookie Year: 2004
Location: Cincinnati, Ohio
Posts: 1,027
Jimmy Nichols has a reputation beyond reputeJimmy Nichols has a reputation beyond reputeJimmy Nichols has a reputation beyond reputeJimmy Nichols has a reputation beyond reputeJimmy Nichols has a reputation beyond reputeJimmy Nichols has a reputation beyond reputeJimmy Nichols has a reputation beyond reputeJimmy Nichols has a reputation beyond reputeJimmy Nichols has a reputation beyond reputeJimmy Nichols has a reputation beyond reputeJimmy Nichols has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via Yahoo to Jimmy Nichols
Re: Pyramid rule clarification

Quote:
Originally Posted by Yankeefan181 View Post
...you may want to re-download the rules.
Just a tip, you may want to either download the FRC Manual app or bookmark the link as there will be Manual updates twice a week. You do not want to be designing on an interpretation of the rules only to find out the rule was updated weeks early.
__________________
Jimmy - Lead Mentor, Pit Boss, Miami Valley FRC Regional Planning Committee
Lakota Robotics - FRC Team 1038

2013 - Crossroads Team Spirit,Quarter-Finalists - Queen City WFFA - Paul George,Quarter-Finalists - Ohio FRC State Championship Champions
2012 - Queen City Volunteer of the Year,Team Spirit,Finalists - Smoky Mountains Engineering Inspiration,Quarterfinalists
2011 - Pittsburgh Semifinalists - Buckeye Engineering Excellence Award,Coopertition Award,SemiFinalists
2010 - Pittsburgh Judge’s Award,Quarterfinalists - Buckeye Industrial Design Award,Finalists - IRI Mentor Round Champions
2009 - Buckeye GM Industrial Design,Champions
2008 - Midwest Engineering Inspiration,Quarterfinalist - IRI Semifinalist
2007 - Pittsburgh Motorola Quality,Finalist - Buckeye Rockwell Automation Innovative Controls,Finalist - Championship Newton Quarterfinalist
Reply With Quote
  #21   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 10-01-2013, 14:38
Taylor's Avatar
Taylor Taylor is offline
Professor of Thinkology, ThD
AKA: @taylorstem
FRC #3487 (Red Pride Robotics)
Team Role: Teacher
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Rookie Year: 2006
Location: Indianapolis, IN, USA 46227
Posts: 4,605
Taylor has a reputation beyond reputeTaylor has a reputation beyond reputeTaylor has a reputation beyond reputeTaylor has a reputation beyond reputeTaylor has a reputation beyond reputeTaylor has a reputation beyond reputeTaylor has a reputation beyond reputeTaylor has a reputation beyond reputeTaylor has a reputation beyond reputeTaylor has a reputation beyond reputeTaylor has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Pyramid rule clarification

Quote:
Originally Posted by nighterfighter View Post
So to play devil's advocate:

Could a robot sit on the floor (Level 0), extend up their arm and touch the bar (level 1), back off the bar (no longer in contact with level 1, but HAS satisfied the requirement of sequential order) then extend to the level 2 bar and attach itself to that bar, while still on the ground, before winching themselves up?

The robot made sequential contact with Level 0 -> Level 1 -> Level 2, but during the time between Level 1 and Level 2, remained in contact with Level 0.
That series of events would be 0-1-0-2 which is not sequential.
__________________
Hi!
Reply With Quote
  #22   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 10-01-2013, 19:36
nighterfighter nighterfighter is offline
1771 Alum, 1771 Mentor
AKA: Matt B
FRC #1771 (1771)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Rookie Year: 2007
Location: Suwanee/Kennesaw, GA
Posts: 835
nighterfighter has a brilliant futurenighterfighter has a brilliant futurenighterfighter has a brilliant futurenighterfighter has a brilliant futurenighterfighter has a brilliant futurenighterfighter has a brilliant futurenighterfighter has a brilliant futurenighterfighter has a brilliant futurenighterfighter has a brilliant futurenighterfighter has a brilliant futurenighterfighter has a brilliant future
Re: Pyramid rule clarification

Quote:
Originally Posted by Taylor View Post
That series of events would be 0-1-0-2 which is not sequential.
Good point.
__________________
1771- Programmer, Captain, Drive Team (2009-2012)
4509- Mentor (2013-2015)
1771- Mentor (2015)
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 22:51.

The Chief Delphi Forums are sponsored by Innovation First International, Inc.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi