|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#16
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: New England District System Proposal
FiM is up to 11 districts this year, over 200 teams.
So why, even based on last years numbers, does NE get to send 20% of their teams, MAR 12%, and FiM only 9%? And if you divide it by this year's counts, FiM is less than 9%. When will FIRST recognize that FiM created an atmosphere for growth in teams, and allow more teams to advance? We'd be up to 5 regional events by now too. |
|
#17
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: New England District System Proposal
Quote:
Quote:
|
|
#18
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: New England District System Proposal
Quote:
For the CMP slots, I feel that the 30:147 and 18:190 equations are going to have to change. I see a ratio of about 1:7, meaning NEF=21, MAR=14 and FiM=27. If I were in MI, I'd be howling very loudly at being punished for the successful growing of FRC. |
|
#19
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: New England District System Proposal
FiM should be on the phone figuring out why FiNE gets 12 more slots with 50 fewer teams. I saw that number and my jaw dropped.
If multiple regions are going to switch over to districts soon, why not start accurately apportioning slots? Just saying "You had x regionals for 6x slots before, so you're stuck with that number" sounds careless. However, as someone who has been watching district models developing in multiple areas, I always like to see progress. |
|
#20
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: New England District System Proposal
From the proposal:
Quote:
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|