Go to Post [Programming a swerve drive] It's really really simple, unless you actually do it. - Ether [more]
Home
Go Back   Chief Delphi > FIRST > Rumor Mill
CD-Media   CD-Spy  
portal register members calendar search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read FAQ rules

 
Reply
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 12-01-2013, 15:45
F22Rapture's Avatar
F22Rapture F22Rapture is offline
College Student, Mentor
AKA: Daniel A
FRC #3737 (4H Rotoraptors)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Rookie Year: 2012
Location: Goldsboro, NC
Posts: 476
F22Rapture has a brilliant futureF22Rapture has a brilliant futureF22Rapture has a brilliant futureF22Rapture has a brilliant futureF22Rapture has a brilliant futureF22Rapture has a brilliant futureF22Rapture has a brilliant futureF22Rapture has a brilliant futureF22Rapture has a brilliant futureF22Rapture has a brilliant futureF22Rapture has a brilliant future
Thoughts on whether the size change will be permanent?

I would hope that it isn't, however FIRST is expanding and they may well be trying to cut down on materials costs by reducing the size. It's also possible that it's a one-time thing due to the dynamics of this year's game. Thoughts?
__________________
Research is what I’m doing when I don’t know what I’m doing.
- Wernher von Braun
Attending: Raleigh NC Regional
Reply With Quote
  #2   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 12-01-2013, 15:51
connor.worley's Avatar
connor.worley connor.worley is offline
Registered User
FRC #0973 (Greybots)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Rookie Year: 2010
Location: Berkeley/San Diego
Posts: 601
connor.worley has a reputation beyond reputeconnor.worley has a reputation beyond reputeconnor.worley has a reputation beyond reputeconnor.worley has a reputation beyond reputeconnor.worley has a reputation beyond reputeconnor.worley has a reputation beyond reputeconnor.worley has a reputation beyond reputeconnor.worley has a reputation beyond reputeconnor.worley has a reputation beyond reputeconnor.worley has a reputation beyond reputeconnor.worley has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Thoughts on whether the size change will be permanent?

Small robots cost less and are easier to transport. We haven't had any issues with designing for a smaller size this year, so I like the new rules.
__________________
Team 973 (2016-???)
Team 5499 (2015-2016)
Team 254 (2014-2015)

Team 1538 (2011-2014)
2014 Driver (25W 17L 1T)
日本語でOK
Reply With Quote
  #3   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 12-01-2013, 15:51
Shu Shu is offline
Registered User
FRC #2137 (TORC)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Rookie Year: 2008
Location: Oxford
Posts: 89
Shu is an unknown quantity at this point
Re: Thoughts on whether the size change will be permanent?

I don't think it would be fair to change the size now that teams have developed strategies and designs based on the current requirements. I'm just talking about this year's game.
Reply With Quote
  #4   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 12-01-2013, 16:22
Bryce Paputa's Avatar
Bryce Paputa Bryce Paputa is offline
FF TSL: Frog Farce
FRC #0503 (Frog Force)
Team Role: Alumni
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Rookie Year: 2008
Location: Novi Michigan
Posts: 454
Bryce Paputa has a reputation beyond reputeBryce Paputa has a reputation beyond reputeBryce Paputa has a reputation beyond reputeBryce Paputa has a reputation beyond reputeBryce Paputa has a reputation beyond reputeBryce Paputa has a reputation beyond reputeBryce Paputa has a reputation beyond reputeBryce Paputa has a reputation beyond reputeBryce Paputa has a reputation beyond reputeBryce Paputa has a reputation beyond reputeBryce Paputa has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Thoughts on whether the size change will be permanent?

I like the new rules. They allow for more creativity and pose a challenge of a smaller robot. However, what I like even more is that the weight is still the same.
Reply With Quote
  #5   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 12-01-2013, 16:22
waialua359's Avatar
waialua359 waialua359 is offline
Mentor
AKA: Glenn
FRC #0359 (Hawaiian Kids)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Rookie Year: 2000
Location: Waialua, HI
Posts: 3,295
waialua359 has a reputation beyond reputewaialua359 has a reputation beyond reputewaialua359 has a reputation beyond reputewaialua359 has a reputation beyond reputewaialua359 has a reputation beyond reputewaialua359 has a reputation beyond reputewaialua359 has a reputation beyond reputewaialua359 has a reputation beyond reputewaialua359 has a reputation beyond reputewaialua359 has a reputation beyond reputewaialua359 has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Thoughts on whether the size change will be permanent?

Quote:
Originally Posted by connor.worley View Post
Small robots cost less and are easier to transport. We haven't had any issues with designing for a smaller size this year, so I like the new rules.
How much less though?
With respect to registration fees, travel costs, and the actual field and game elements not significantly smaller, I find it much more difficult to design a robot vs. the "savings" made from a smaller robot.
__________________

2016 Hawaii Regional #1 seed, IDesign, Safety Award
2016 NY Tech Valley Regional Champions, #1 seed, Innovation in Controls Award
2016 Lake Superior Regional Champions, #1 seed, Quality Award, Dean's List
2015 FRC Worlds-Carver Division Champions
2015 Hawaii Regional Champions, #1 seed.
2015 Australia Regional Champions, #2 seed, Engineering Excellence Award
2015 Inland Empire Regional Champions, #1 seed, Industrial Design Award
2014 OZARK Mountain Brawl Champions, #1 seed.
2014 Hawaii Regional Champions, #1 seed, UL Safety Award
2014 Dallas Regional Champions, #1 seed, Engineering Excellence Award
2014 Northern Lights Regional Champions, #1 seed, Entrepreneurship Award
2013 Championship Dean's List Winner
2013 Utah Regional Champion, #1 seed, KP&B Award, Deans List
2013 Boilermaker Regional Champion, #1 seed, Motorola Quality Award
2012 Lone Star Regional Champion, #1 seed, Motorola Quality Award
2012 Hawaii Regional Champions #1 seed, Motorola Quality Award
Reply With Quote
  #6   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 12-01-2013, 16:23
Akash Rastogi Akash Rastogi is offline
Jim Zondag is my Spirit Animal
FRC #2170 (Titanium Tomahawks)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Rookie Year: 2006
Location: Manchester, Connecticut
Posts: 7,003
Akash Rastogi has a reputation beyond reputeAkash Rastogi has a reputation beyond reputeAkash Rastogi has a reputation beyond reputeAkash Rastogi has a reputation beyond reputeAkash Rastogi has a reputation beyond reputeAkash Rastogi has a reputation beyond reputeAkash Rastogi has a reputation beyond reputeAkash Rastogi has a reputation beyond reputeAkash Rastogi has a reputation beyond reputeAkash Rastogi has a reputation beyond reputeAkash Rastogi has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Thoughts on whether the size change will be permanent?

Quote:
Originally Posted by waialua359 View Post
How much less though?
I believe the savings are pretty negligible in regards to material costs.
__________________
My posts and opinions do not necessarily reflect those of my affiliated team.
['16-'xx]: Mentor FRC 2170 | ['11-'13]: Co-Founder/Mentor FRC 3929 | ['06-'10]: Student FRC 11 - MORT | ['08-'12]: Founder - EWCP (OG)
Reply With Quote
  #7   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 12-01-2013, 16:37
Nuttyman54's Avatar
Nuttyman54 Nuttyman54 is offline
Mentor, Tactician
AKA: Evan "Numbers" Morrison
FRC #5803 (Apex Robotics) and FRC #0971 (Spartan Robotics)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Rookie Year: 2005
Location: Seattle, WA/Mountain View, CA
Posts: 2,134
Nuttyman54 has a reputation beyond reputeNuttyman54 has a reputation beyond reputeNuttyman54 has a reputation beyond reputeNuttyman54 has a reputation beyond reputeNuttyman54 has a reputation beyond reputeNuttyman54 has a reputation beyond reputeNuttyman54 has a reputation beyond reputeNuttyman54 has a reputation beyond reputeNuttyman54 has a reputation beyond reputeNuttyman54 has a reputation beyond reputeNuttyman54 has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to Nuttyman54
Re: Thoughts on whether the size change will be permanent?

I don't think FIRST will see a particular cost savings from the robot size, although theoretically it may give them a reason to reduce the pit space slightly to allow for more teams at an event.

I feel that the decision was made to force teams to choose between a good climber and a good shooter. The additional restrictive playing configuration size limitations make it difficult, if not impossible, to fit both mechanisms onto a single robot. I believe it was a conscious decision by the GDC to diversify the robot capabilities and force teams to focus on doing one aspect of the game well, or a few aspects mediocre.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #8   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 12-01-2013, 17:40
EricH's Avatar
EricH EricH is offline
New year, new team
FRC #1197 (Torbots)
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Rookie Year: 2003
Location: SoCal
Posts: 19,726
EricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Thoughts on whether the size change will be permanent?

I think that the size change was FIRST's way of giving notice: Anything can and will change at any time.

Before this size change, the size has stayed the same* since 2005. Before that, the size stayed the same for several years; I don't remember when it became 30"x36"x60" so I can't say anything about how long. Teams have locked into--and to some extent assumed--a constant size. A number of offseason drives have been prototyped, at the 28"x38" size. Maybe one or two offseason drives snuck into the competition. (Note: I do not include the extension limits as part of the size here; those changed every year.)

The size change changes all that. It forces teams to adapt--or engineer--their designs. It also opens the design up a bit, making the competition harder. And, it's really, really easy to tweak in future. Just change one number, and watch the wheels in 20,000 heads start turning.

Incidentally, when I competed in SAE Aero Design's Regular Class, there was a similar limit to aircraft size: length+width+height<=X, and X could change year to year. We tended to build to a long wingspan. Other teams built more to the long tail or tall height sides of the spectrum. In different years, with somewhat different rules, different long dimensions did better.

I think the size change will be semi-permanent. That is, the change in how dimensions are calculated is probably here to stay for several years; the actual number will probably vary year-to-year.


*Barring 2007's varying height, which did not affect the perimeter size, but was rather popular in public opinion.
__________________
Past teams:
2003-2007: FRC0330 BeachBots
2008: FRC1135 Shmoebotics
2012: FRC4046 Schroedinger's Dragons

"Rockets are tricky..."--Elon Musk

Reply With Quote
  #9   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 12-01-2013, 20:30
apalrd's Avatar
apalrd apalrd is offline
More Torque!
AKA: Andrew Palardy (Most people call me Palardy)
VRC #3333
Team Role: College Student
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Rookie Year: 2009
Location: Auburn Hills, MI
Posts: 1,347
apalrd has a reputation beyond reputeapalrd has a reputation beyond reputeapalrd has a reputation beyond reputeapalrd has a reputation beyond reputeapalrd has a reputation beyond reputeapalrd has a reputation beyond reputeapalrd has a reputation beyond reputeapalrd has a reputation beyond reputeapalrd has a reputation beyond reputeapalrd has a reputation beyond reputeapalrd has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Thoughts on whether the size change will be permanent?

Quote:
Originally Posted by connor.worley View Post
Small robots cost less
We have yet to save any money due to the smaller footprint and extension limits. The metal itself is a small portion of our robot cost.

We have saved a lot of robot money in speed controllers and in many mechanical parts due to the new low-cost Vex Pro and reduced price AndyMark components. The savings from these two alone is far larger than reducing the robot size by 10", likely several orders of magnitude larger.

I am not a fan of the 54" cylinder including the bumper, but I don't mind the footprint rules.
__________________
Kettering University - Computer Engineering
Kettering Motorsports
Williams International - Commercial Engines - Controls and Accessories
FRC 33 - The Killer Bees - 2009-2012 Student, 2013-2014 Advisor
VEX IQ 3333 - The Bumble Bees - 2014+ Mentor

"Sometimes, the elegant implementation is a function. Not a method. Not a class. Not a framework. Just a function." ~ John Carmack
Reply With Quote
  #10   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 12-01-2013, 21:16
s_forbes's Avatar
s_forbes s_forbes is offline
anonymous internet person
FRC #0842 (Falcon Robotics)
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Rookie Year: 2006
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 1,125
s_forbes has a reputation beyond reputes_forbes has a reputation beyond reputes_forbes has a reputation beyond reputes_forbes has a reputation beyond reputes_forbes has a reputation beyond reputes_forbes has a reputation beyond reputes_forbes has a reputation beyond reputes_forbes has a reputation beyond reputes_forbes has a reputation beyond reputes_forbes has a reputation beyond reputes_forbes has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Thoughts on whether the size change will be permanent?

I love the new method of sizing robot frames by using the perimeter. It encourages teams to put more thought into the design of the robot compared to the "these are our max dimensions, let's use all of it" approach. There should be some more interesting frame designs this year compared to the last 6 years. I'm also hoping that we'll see more light, zippy robots this year instead of a fleet of 120lb rectangles.

Best of all, we finally got rid of that darn sizing box!
Reply With Quote
  #11   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 12-01-2013, 21:54
Ian Curtis Ian Curtis is offline
Best Available Data
FRC #1778 (Chill Out!)
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Rookie Year: 2004
Location: Puget Sound
Posts: 2,520
Ian Curtis has a reputation beyond reputeIan Curtis has a reputation beyond reputeIan Curtis has a reputation beyond reputeIan Curtis has a reputation beyond reputeIan Curtis has a reputation beyond reputeIan Curtis has a reputation beyond reputeIan Curtis has a reputation beyond reputeIan Curtis has a reputation beyond reputeIan Curtis has a reputation beyond reputeIan Curtis has a reputation beyond reputeIan Curtis has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Thoughts on whether the size change will be permanent?

Quote:
Originally Posted by s_forbes View Post
I love the new method of sizing robot frames by using the perimeter.
Me too! Airplane people are all about trade-offs. This method of sizing forces teams to consider many more trade offs instead of just building to a typical size and putting a mechanism in their somehow. OTOH, the Frisbees take up a significant footprint in the robot, so it will be harder for some teams to design working mechanisms.

IMO, it makes it a little harder to be overweight as well. On the flip side, it'll make robots more tippy.
__________________
CHILL OUT! | Aero Stability & Control Engineer
Adam Savage's Obsessions (TED Talk) (Part 2)
It is much easier to call someone else a genius than admit to yourself that you are lazy. - Dave Gingery
Reply With Quote
  #12   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 12-01-2013, 22:03
NotaJoke's Avatar
NotaJoke NotaJoke is offline
Future Engineer
no team
Team Role: Scout
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Rookie Year: 2012
Location: Robots
Posts: 60
NotaJoke has much to be proud ofNotaJoke has much to be proud ofNotaJoke has much to be proud ofNotaJoke has much to be proud ofNotaJoke has much to be proud ofNotaJoke has much to be proud ofNotaJoke has much to be proud ofNotaJoke has much to be proud of
Re: Thoughts on whether the size change will be permanent?

I think that lifting the robot onto the field caused potential issues. The smaller robots fit through the opening better.

I like the idea of having a perimeter limit, but I don't like that it's so small =P
Reply With Quote
  #13   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 12-01-2013, 22:13
MARS_James's Avatar
MARS_James MARS_James is offline
Always Scouting
AKA: James Comstock
FRC #0179 (The Children of The Swamp)
Team Role: Tactician
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Rookie Year: 2006
Location: Jupiter, Florida
Posts: 1,957
MARS_James has a reputation beyond reputeMARS_James has a reputation beyond reputeMARS_James has a reputation beyond reputeMARS_James has a reputation beyond reputeMARS_James has a reputation beyond reputeMARS_James has a reputation beyond reputeMARS_James has a reputation beyond reputeMARS_James has a reputation beyond reputeMARS_James has a reputation beyond reputeMARS_James has a reputation beyond reputeMARS_James has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to MARS_James
Re: Thoughts on whether the size change will be permanent?

I look at it like this:

2007: Weight/Height Classes (only lasted one year)
2008: No Defense (only lasted one year)
2009: Required Design Aspect (only lasted one year)
2010: Not Allowed To Pick Up Game Pieces (only lasted one year)
2011: Minibot (only lasted one year)
2012: Huge CoOpertition Effect, or Kinect (Both only lasted one year)

So this is either the continuation of these or the next step in FIRST like all technology, it gets smaller as time goes on
__________________
Driving Record: 24-8
Coaching Record: 66-31
2014 South Florida Regional Woodie Flowers Finalist


Reply With Quote
  #14   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 20-01-2013, 09:40
Ido_Wolf's Avatar
Ido_Wolf Ido_Wolf is offline
LabVIEW Addict
AKA: Ido
FRC #2230 (General Angels)
Team Role: Alumni
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Rookie Year: 2011
Location: Israel
Posts: 42
Ido_Wolf is an unknown quantity at this point
Re: Thoughts on whether the size change will be permanent?

Right now, robots are way too big for the average end-user, and their utilization is extremely limited especially with that horrible cRIO firmware v3.1. But in like 15 years, when it's 2010, we'll probably see little portable robots with a 10" long arm that can do so much more than our current mechanical arms!

/lame-attempt-at-being-funny-with-a-poor-analogy
Reply With Quote
  #15   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 20-01-2013, 09:52
Billfred's Avatar
Billfred Billfred is offline
...and you can't! teach! that!
FRC #5402 (Iron Kings); no team (AndyMark)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Rookie Year: 2004
Location: The Land of the Kokomese, IN
Posts: 8,484
Billfred has a reputation beyond reputeBillfred has a reputation beyond reputeBillfred has a reputation beyond reputeBillfred has a reputation beyond reputeBillfred has a reputation beyond reputeBillfred has a reputation beyond reputeBillfred has a reputation beyond reputeBillfred has a reputation beyond reputeBillfred has a reputation beyond reputeBillfred has a reputation beyond reputeBillfred has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Thoughts on whether the size change will be permanent?

I think FIRST made the change to make this game harder. At 28x38, this game would be much, much easier. (More room to index, more room to put a hanger.)

I'm personally quite happy with the change, as it does stand to make robots more transportable. (My car BARELY fit a 28x38 robot on its side.) Easier transportation is nice both in-season and for demos.

Which brings me to another point: FIRST has really given us some games that lend themselves to demos. I know we plan to keep our 2012 robot Incocknito together, and hopefully get it back to operational in the off-season.
__________________
William "Billfred" Leverette - Gamecock/Jessica Boucher victim/Marketing & Sales Specialist at AndyMark

2004-2006: FRC 1293 (D5 Robotics) - Student, Mentor, Coach
2007-2009: FRC 1618 (Capital Robotics) - Mentor, Coach
2009-2013: FRC 2815 (Los Pollos Locos) - Mentor, Coach - Palmetto '09, Peachtree '11, Palmetto '11, Palmetto '12
2010: FRC 1398 (Keenan Robo-Raiders) - Mentor - Palmetto '10
2014-2016: FRC 4901 (Garnet Squadron) - Co-Founder and Head Bot Coach - Orlando '14, SCRIW '16
2017-: FRC 5402 (Iron Kings) - Mentor

93 events (more than will fit in a ChiefDelphi signature), 13 seasons, over 60,000 miles, and still on a mission from Bob.

Rule #1: Do not die. Rule #2: Be respectful. Rule #3: Be safe. Rule #4: Follow the handbook.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:58.

The Chief Delphi Forums are sponsored by Innovation First International, Inc.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi