|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: *Warning* On talons!!!!
Quote:
|
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: *Warning* On talons!!!!
Unfortunately, there aren't numbers available for the Victor 888 (the website says "Update Coming Soon", last time I checked). But some specs to compare:
Jaguar: Continuous current: 40A 2 second current: 60A peak at startup: 100A Source: http://content.vexrobotics.com/docs/..._Datasheet.pdf Talon: Up to 100 amps peak 60 amps continuous current. Source: http://www.crosstheroadelectronics.c...Manual_1_2.pdf The Talon really isn't any different from the other speed controllers, and you'll only risk blowing one if you design something poorly (like a CIM motor that's constantly stalled). We've used Jaguars for years on our drive train, and never blown one, I don't expect to see anything different from the Talon. The breaker is present to protect the wiring, not the components attached to it. |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: *Warning* On talons!!!!
We ran a talon with fan in a drive train stalled and pulled a continuous 78 amps by using multiple 40amp breaker inputs with no problem for extended periods of time during our beta testing.
An FRC robot should have a 40 amp snap action breaker that should not allow the Talon or Any Other motor controller to see 100 amps continuously for any amount of time. Can you please detail your robot setup to show us how you pulled 100 amps long enough to damage the Talon? Last edited by Tom Line : 15-01-2013 at 15:48. |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: *Warning* On talons!!!!
My team has been using Talons for a while, some months before the kickoff and so far any problems have been noticed. Actually, we did have some problems with Jaguars before using Talons.
|
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: *Warning* On talons!!!!
Quote:
|
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: *Warning* On talons!!!!
The point of this thread was to get the knowledge out there to be careful
|
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: *Warning* On talons!!!!
Quote:
Please do not spread Fear/Uncertainty/Doubt without evidence. |
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: *Warning* On talons!!!!
I am still very confused about what we should be careful of. Used correctly, none of the first motor controllers will ever see that amount of current long enough to damage them.
|
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: *Warning* On talons!!!!
So what I'm reading is that according to the spec, you should be careful using a Talon on an unprotected circut, so don't connect directly to the battery on one side with a CIM locked in a vice on the other.
Just testing my underastanding of the issue... Of course if you wired things up similar to what's shown in the rulebook, you would have 2 breakers, both of which should go long before the Talon. |
|
#10
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: *Warning* On talons!!!!
I understand that, but as a result, the Talon should never be able to see 133A.
|
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: *Warning* On talons!!!!
Quote:
Even with a breaker in place, you can still damage a motor controller with excessive current (e.g. a short circuit). The breakers simply can't react fast enough to save the components in certain situations. That is why "breakers are for preventing fires, not saving the components." Breakers do play a role in component safety, but they need to be used in conjunction with proper electrical design. When using a motor controller...
-David |
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: *Warning* On talons!!!!
Cory,
David points out that short spikes of current will get through.. Check out the circuit breaker spec here. As you can see, a 40A circuit breaker will allow 500% (200A) to pass for 0.2 to 0.3s before tripping. -Scott |
|
#13
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: *Warning* On talons!!!!
Quote:
|
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: *Warning* On talons!!!!
Emphasis on can damage.
I have personally caused a Jaguar failure by connecting a dead short across the motor terminals. This was in early Jaguar testing 3-4 years ago. I haven't personally caused a failure with the others. Scott and I aren't implying that certain exact conditions will or will not damage any of the motor controllers. We're trying stop a common misconception that the breakers instantaneously trip once you go over 40A. They take time, and can't be guaranteed to protect anything but the wiring. -David |
|
#15
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: *Warning* On talons!!!!
Quote:
Assuming the datasheet specs for the 40 amp breaker can be trusted, it's possible to design a product around those specs so that the breaker WILL protect it. Hence the question: what are the chances of damaging, say, a Talon, if it is properly wired and protected by a properly operating in-spec 40 amp FRC breaker? I wouldn't lose any sleep over it. Last edited by Ether : 15-01-2013 at 19:47. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|