|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Team Update 1-15-2013
It has been a long day with robots of plastic and aluminum at both ends. We're slow and were doing full-scale modeling to determine our compliance with 54" rule in its prior form. Now I read of the rules change and that several teams are feeling that their initial designs are now illegal. This is where the tired part comes in. I'm having trouble imagining how something legal for the vertical cylinder is now illegal for a tilted one. I'm sure those are right, just in a FRC fog at the moment I guess.
|
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Team Update 1-15-2013
Quote:
|
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Team Update 1-15-2013
I'm happy to say that my team's level 3 climber design is still legal
![]() |
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Team Update 1-15-2013
Quote:
This is a disappointing ruling from the GDC. Major changes like this shouldn't be necessary to the size restrictions, which are some of the most crucial rules teams have to design around. Coming in week 2 as teams are finishing prototypes and some have begun ordering parts is the real kicker. |
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Team Update 1-15-2013
Looks like we found a relatively simple solution to fix our climbing for this update. However, this could have easily been a complete disaster for us since we are integrating all of our functions into one mechanism this year. I feel for all the other teams who will not have as easy of a time making their designs legal if they will even be able to use it at all.
|
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Team Update 1-15-2013
Quote:
edit: just imagine slicing a plane through a vertical 54 inch cylinder at a 60 degree angle. edit2: this is only one example Last edited by BigJ : 15-01-2013 at 22:31. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|