Talon Motors

[Arrowhead]

Originally Posted by Toa Circuit

You just declare them like as with victors and jaguars- They use the same PWM signal.

Jaguar *motora;

motora = new Jaguar(1);

Basically, you do not need to code any differently for Victors, Jaguars, or Talons.

Ok, thanks for the info
All of the programmers on our team are completely new to FRC, so we are still learning a lot.

[Toa Circuit]

Originally Posted by Arrowhead

Ok, thanks for the info
All of the programmers on our team are completely new to FRC, so we are still learning a lot.

Actually, looking at the other people's posts, and realizing there actually is a Talon class in C++ (How did I miss that...) you might want to use the Talon class. Basically just substitute "Talon" for "Jaguar" for declaration and initialization, and everything else is the same.

[Doron_Sivan]

You can declare a Talon in C++ by writing
Talon t1 = new Talon(TALON_PORT);
when TALON_PORT is an int for the port.

Beaware that the RobotDrive class automatically initiallize jaguars when declaring the defult constructor (when the parameters are numbers).
So when you use Talons don't decalre it like this:

RobotDrive drive = new RobotDrive(1, 2, 3, 4);

but like this
RobotDrive drive = new RobotDrive(new Talon(1), new Talon(2), new Talon(3), new Talon(4));

Doron

[Arrowhead]

Also, is the min/max values for the talons the same as jaguars?
If not, what are the min/max values?

[F22Rapture]

They're the same. -1 to 1.

[Arrowhead]

Originally Posted by F22Rapture

They're the same. -1 to 1.

Ok, thanks

[Ether]

FWIW, under the hood they are not the same. Jag and Talon expect different min/max pulse widths.

That's why WPILib provides separate drivers for them.

[Arrowhead]

Originally Posted by Ether

FWIW, under the hood they are not the same. Jag and Talon expect different min/max pulse widths.

That's why WPILib provides separate drivers for them.

but on the programming side they are the same?

[Ether]

Originally Posted by Arrowhead

but on the programming side they are the same?

The purpose of the separate drivers is to present a common interface to the programmer.