|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Drive Belt vs. Chains
My team has had many bad experiences with belts, so we tend to stick with chain. In 2011, we had belts drive our tube manipulator, and the belts would slip and it would render it ineffective. Chains rarely slip, normally they just snap or break, but its much harder to get a chain to malfunction than it is to get a belt to malfunction.
|
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Drive Belt vs. Chains
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MgYnw...XrOpK1&index=2
This is a great resource to see an effective way of running power transmission in a WCD, or any other base style, for that matter. |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Drive Belt vs. Chains
Quote:
Last edited by Chris is me : 17-01-2013 at 18:47. |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Drive Belt vs. Chains
That is also true, and I should have mentioned it. A simple, robust drivetrain goes a long way in FRC, and more complex designs need time to be developed.
|
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Drive Belt vs. Chains
Keep in mind the old adage: KISS (Keep It Simple, Stupid). FRC isn't the place to optimize every little bit out of a design. You do not want a perfect robot, you want a good enough robot.
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|