|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Full Court Target Detection
thanks you for posting this. Would you recommend using this lens on an axis 206?
|
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Full Court Target Detection
I'm not sure I understand the question. They are good quality lenses and I have used them on the 206. If you remove the lens you will find that the threads are pretty loose. I applied a bit of teflon tape to keep the lens from twisting due to vibration on the robot.
I'm not convinced that IR is a better solution than visible light, and I think it will be harder to debug if/when it doesn't work. If you try out IR, do it methodically, and perhaps have a backup plan -- a visible-light LED ring and lens to swap back to. Greg McKaskle |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Full Court Target Detection
i agree that IR might not be the best way to go. Are only problem with RGB light is currently we can not get full court detection without having a very strong light and running the risk of violating the rules
|
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Full Court Target Detection
If you get the LEDs close to the lens I think you'll find that they won't be nearly as bright as the folks with the photon cannons. Please post images and I'll do what I can to help analyze them.
Greg McKaskle |
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Full Court Target Detection
thanks a lot for your help. i will try to get some screen shots this weekend
|
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Full Court Target Detection
Quote:
- Bryce |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Full Court Target Detection
Quote:
Heres another way of looking at this. The retroreflective material is graded by how much more light it reflects than white paint. I believe the material used is at least 300x brighter. That means it only takes 1/300th the intensity of light when used properly. Greg McKaskle |
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Full Court Target Detection
Just a warning for other teams. The axis 206 camera has an IR filter. We attempted to remove the filter today and found it not to be possible.
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|