|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#16
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Safely removing a level three climber
We are considering all of this in our design. Also don't forget that you need to power off the robot, not just the air, but the circuit breaker as well. Which means you need to be able to reach that from the ground as well.
|
|
#17
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Safely removing a level three climber
I worry that for some teams attempting the 3rd level climb this may inadvertently mean no female drivers this year. If our team were picking a drive team that needed to have the height and upper body strength to safely remove a high climbing robot, without even a step stool, most if not all of the women that were on our drive team last year would be at a significant disadvantage this year. I hope there is some serious consideration of how the inflexibility in this rule as currently stated might end up affecting some students.
|
|
#18
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Safely removing a level three climber
Quote:
Can anyone confirm this? |
|
#19
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Safely removing a level three climber
Quote:
You can only have one main breaker. R38 requires that the main breaker be connected exactly as shown, which prevents installing a secondary. |
|
#20
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Safely removing a level three climber
I read the unpowered to mean that you will not be able to enable the robot to lower it. Similar to past years. I can see the safety people requiring the robot to be powered off by the breaker though. I don't see anything that requires the venting of the pneumatic system. Depending on the design, that might be a way to lower your robot.
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|