Go to Post If said device costs 10x more to manufacture than a simpler solution integrating COTS parts, and only performs 10% better, that's poor engineering. - Cory [more]
Home
Go Back   Chief Delphi > Competition > Rules/Strategy
CD-Media   CD-Spy  
portal register members calendar search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read FAQ rules

 
Closed Thread
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 20-01-2013, 22:28
daniel_dsouza daniel_dsouza is offline
does what needs to be done.
FRC #2449 (Out of Orbit Robotics)
Team Role: Alumni
 
Join Date: May 2011
Rookie Year: 2011
Location: Chandler, AZ
Posts: 231
daniel_dsouza has a spectacular aura aboutdaniel_dsouza has a spectacular aura about
An public opinion needed

Hi CD,

Our team was debating climbing mechanisms, and have iterated down to 2 designs. One is vastly simpler than the other, but may infringe upon the rules (hence the post). Keep reading for details.

So if a robot starts on the ground, and extends an arm to the second horizontal pole, with an attachment that loops over the top of the pole, would that be an infringement of the rules? I do not recall the rules manual saying that there may be small protrusions into a 3rd level, but rather that the robot may only be in 2 levels at once.

I think that this is an infringement of the rules, but some of my team members disagree.

I argue that the robot would need to get off the ground, and climb until it is at level 2 before it can hang from the 2nd bar. Whereas my team members say that there is only a small protrusion into level 3, so the robot can climb into level 2 (above 1st bar.)

Thanks in advance.
  #2   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 20-01-2013, 22:34
KrazyCarl92's Avatar
KrazyCarl92 KrazyCarl92 is online now
Registered User
AKA: Carl Springli
FRC #5811 (The BONDS)(EWCP)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Rookie Year: 2010
Location: Dayton, OH
Posts: 521
KrazyCarl92 has a reputation beyond reputeKrazyCarl92 has a reputation beyond reputeKrazyCarl92 has a reputation beyond reputeKrazyCarl92 has a reputation beyond reputeKrazyCarl92 has a reputation beyond reputeKrazyCarl92 has a reputation beyond reputeKrazyCarl92 has a reputation beyond reputeKrazyCarl92 has a reputation beyond reputeKrazyCarl92 has a reputation beyond reputeKrazyCarl92 has a reputation beyond reputeKrazyCarl92 has a reputation beyond repute
Re: An public opinion needed

Quote:
Originally Posted by daniel_dsouza View Post
Hi CD,

Our team was debating climbing mechanisms, and have iterated down to 2 designs. One is vastly simpler than the other, but may infringe upon the rules (hence the post). Keep reading for details.

So if a robot starts on the ground, and extends an arm to the second horizontal pole, with an attachment that loops over the top of the pole, would that be an infringement of the rules? I do not recall the rules manual saying that there may be small protrusions into a 3rd level, but rather that the robot may only be in 2 levels at once.

I think that this is an infringement of the rules, but some of my team members disagree.

I argue that the robot would need to get off the ground, and climb until it is at level 2 before it can hang from the 2nd bar. Whereas my team members say that there is only a small protrusion into level 3, so the robot can climb into level 2 (above 1st bar.)

Thanks in advance.
For a valid climb, your robot may occupy more than 2 zones, however, it may not contact the pyramid in more than 2 zones. An attachment to the second horizontal pole, as mentioned above, counts as contact in LEVEL 2. However, this contact cannot be made while in contact with the ground (LEVEL 0), as these are not consecutive levels, thereby such an act would invalidate the climb. The robot must be completely lifted off the ground before contacting the second horizontal bar. However, if this condition is met, the climb may proceed as valid.
__________________
[2017-present] FRC 0020 - The Rocketeers
[2016] FRC 5811 - BONDS Robotics
[2010-2015] FRC 0020 - The Rocketeers

Last edited by KrazyCarl92 : 20-01-2013 at 22:36. Reason: less ambiguous wording
  #3   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 20-01-2013, 22:36
ksafin's Avatar
ksafin ksafin is offline
Registered User
AKA: Kirill Safin
FRC #3992 (Eagles Robotics Xperience)
Team Role: Leadership
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Rookie Year: 2012
Location: Delray Beach, FL
Posts: 498
ksafin has a brilliant futureksafin has a brilliant futureksafin has a brilliant futureksafin has a brilliant futureksafin has a brilliant futureksafin has a brilliant futureksafin has a brilliant futureksafin has a brilliant futureksafin has a brilliant futureksafin has a brilliant futureksafin has a brilliant future
Re: An public opinion needed

Further, if you have a predicament like this "Public opinion needed" isn't the right way to go.

Q&A.
__________________
FTC Teams 5257, 6568 & FRC Team 3992
Eagles Robotics Xperience
2014 FTC WORLD CHAMPIONS
14 Trophies in 3 Years
  #4   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 20-01-2013, 22:37
EricH's Avatar
EricH EricH is offline
New year, new team
FRC #1197 (Torbots)
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Rookie Year: 2003
Location: SoCal
Posts: 19,802
EricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond repute
Re: An public opinion needed

Your teammates are incorrect, and so are you.

You may be in a zone, as long as you do not contact the zone (Q&A) Therefore, you may reach above the horizontal for any given zone and come down to the horizontal and be just fine. This is where you are incorrect and your teammates are correct.

However, your teammates are also incorrect, and you are correct (though not for the right reason). Remember that you must contact the zones sequentially, and only two at a time, including level zero, the floor. This is why extending to the second horizontal from the floor is not going to net you any climb points--you're out of sequence, or 3 at a time, or both.

tl;dr: As described, the first method will not get you any climb points, while the second will, but is overly cumbersome (in my mind, not having seen your setup).
__________________
Past teams:
2003-2007: FRC0330 BeachBots
2008: FRC1135 Shmoebotics
2012: FRC4046 Schroedinger's Dragons

"Rockets are tricky..."--Elon Musk

  #5   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 20-01-2013, 22:40
~Cory~'s Avatar
~Cory~ ~Cory~ is offline
Student
AKA: Cory Rypkema
FRC #0706
Team Role: Alumni
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Rookie Year: 2010
Location: Worcester MA
Posts: 216
~Cory~ is a splendid one to behold~Cory~ is a splendid one to behold~Cory~ is a splendid one to behold~Cory~ is a splendid one to behold~Cory~ is a splendid one to behold~Cory~ is a splendid one to behold~Cory~ is a splendid one to behold
Re: An public opinion needed

1. Ask the Q/A if there is any uncertainty.
2. Does this "loop" touch the second pole while on the ground?

Airspace is not part of the pyramid in terms of contact so you could "loop" over the pole with out touching it. I don't really see how this would be useful, however.
__________________
corin.rypkema.org
WPI Class of '17
'12 Dean's List Finalist, Mentor of 706 - Cyberhawks

Last edited by ~Cory~ : 20-01-2013 at 22:44.
  #6   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 20-01-2013, 23:01
Siri's Avatar
Siri Siri is offline
Dare greatly
AKA: 1640 coach 2010-2014
FRC #2641 (PCCR; Refs & RIs)
Team Role: Coach
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Rookie Year: 2007
Location: PA
Posts: 1,632
Siri has a reputation beyond reputeSiri has a reputation beyond reputeSiri has a reputation beyond reputeSiri has a reputation beyond reputeSiri has a reputation beyond reputeSiri has a reputation beyond reputeSiri has a reputation beyond reputeSiri has a reputation beyond reputeSiri has a reputation beyond reputeSiri has a reputation beyond reputeSiri has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via ICQ to Siri
Re: An public opinion needed

If you are on the ground: [Level 0]
...You can also contact anything up to and including the top surface of the first horizontal bar. [Level 1]

If you are not on the ground and are only contacting between the ground and the top surface of Bar 1: [Level 1]
...You can also contact anything up to and including the top surface of Bar 2. [Level 2]

If you are only contacting above (not inclusive) the top of Bar 1, up to an including the top of Bar 2: [Level 2]
...You can also contact anything above you. [Level 3]


In your case, if you are on the ground, you cannot contact anything above the top surface of Bar 1. You're looking to touch Bar 2, which is 30" above your allowed zone--not a small protrusion, even if those were legal in the rules (which they're not). You are skipping a level; not contacting 3 at once: you've entirely missed Level 1.

Additionally, "I argue that the robot would need to get off the ground, and climb until it is at level 2 before it can hang from the 2nd bar" is untrue. You can contact Bar 2 (up to and including the top surface) as soon as you lose contact with the ground by entering Level 1 (up to and including the top of Bar 1).
__________________
Closed Thread


Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 00:20.

The Chief Delphi Forums are sponsored by Innovation First International, Inc.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi