|
|
|
 With three robots, I was expecting better scores but I guess more robots means more penalties, not more points. - sanddrag [more] |
 |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
| With three robots, I was expecting better scores but I guess more robots means more penalties, not more points. - sanddrag [more] |
|
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#8
06-01-2002, 17:11
|
||||
|
||||
|
Its super simple and our FIRST nature is making it more confusing than it needs to be...
If the goal is over the Z1-Z2 line, then common sense dictates that it is in both zones and since one of those zones is the goal scoring zone, then the goal also accrues points. I do agree though, it would have been clearer if it was written: Bullet 3 states: "... the Red Alliance ball scoring zones are zones 1 & 2" Bullet 4 states: "... the Red Alliance ball and goal zone is zone 2" |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Robot/Goal scoring: Official Answer Mike Martus | Mike Martus | OCCRA | 6 | 21-10-2003 23:51 |
| User-friendly scoring chart | Jacqui Sutton | General Forum | 4 | 08-01-2003 17:38 |
| Proactive approach to scoring dilemmas | reisser | 3D Animation and Competition | 0 | 02-07-2002 21:54 |
| FIRST Downloadable Database (manual, teams, scoring,...) | archiver | 2001 | 1 | 24-06-2002 01:11 |
| scoring questions | archiver | 2000 | 3 | 23-06-2002 22:28 |
Threaded Mode