|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
pic: Crevolution Teaser #2
|
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: pic: Crevolution Teaser #2
Someone actually made a spherical robot?
![]() |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: pic: Crevolution Teaser #2
I kinda doubt this... 3 550s in p60s as drive????
Or I guess all the CIMS are used for shooting/hanger but still.... |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: pic: Crevolution Teaser #2
Quote:
|
|
#5
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: pic: Crevolution Teaser #2
I think that picture is near the top of my list for "World's least credible drivetrains". A three wheel killough already seems unlikely due to the complication, weird frame, and lack of pushing ability. Combine that with the idea of using easily toasted RS-550s in a stall-likely application, PLUS the incredibly popular* P60 gearboxes... Well. That would really be one of the all time worst drivetrains, really.
So what are the three P60s actually getting used for? *Popular because you need to buy so many spare parts to keep them running through a season, of couse. |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: pic: Crevolution Teaser #2
Quote:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ed7XDsZtkAM Err hmm... It's not THAT complex. |
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: pic: Crevolution Teaser #2
Does a shape with no corners need bumpers?
wait...how would you make them anyways? |
|
#8
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: pic: Crevolution Teaser #2
Quote:
I think applying that logic to a round frame would imply that you need the entire perimeter covered in bumper, as every point on the perimeter is a "corner". Yes, it depends on how you define "corner". I'm assuming you define it as a change in direction of the perimeter. If you're insisting that it has to be a "sharp" step change in direction for it to count as a corner, then any robot could be bumperless by taking a belt sander and rounding the corners of their frame. |
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: pic: Crevolution Teaser #2
it was more of a joke. I guess the real question is how you bend the wood for that.
|
|
#10
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: pic: Crevolution Teaser #2
Quote:
OK, maybe not quite so easy, but that's about how I'd do it. |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: pic: Crevolution Teaser #2
Quote:
|
|
#12
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: pic: Crevolution Teaser #2
Quote:
Quote:
|
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: pic: Crevolution Teaser #2
That's an awesome drive, good luck
) |
|
#14
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: pic: Crevolution Teaser #2
I wonder why you guys felt you needed to use a holonomic drive base, or how you would find it beneficial.
|
|
#15
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: pic: Crevolution Teaser #2
Maybe they are trying to get to the loader, as quick as they can (and make the base as light as they can) so they went with that (which i personally would stay away from) then they either shoot a ton into the goals and/or grab there colored Frisbees. then move to the pyramid and use there 6 CIMs to do a 30 point climb and the 20 pts for the frisbees into the goal the "50 point super move"
or its not there drive or maybe there "punkin" us... |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|