|
|
|
 An inability to communicate your ideas effectively is a handicap you would be well served to strive to overcome. - Ether [more] |
 |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
| An inability to communicate your ideas effectively is a handicap you would be well served to strive to overcome. - Ether [more] |
|
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#3
06-01-2002, 20:16
|
||||
|
||||
|
When I read the rule yesterday I didn't like it that much. Now after thinking about it & talking with others about the implementations, I agree that it's a good rule. I like the fact that it gets rid of the 'sideline champions,' the teams that don't compete at all during the eliminations but still are considered champions.
The strategy of playing which pair of bots in which match is important. Do you want to put your best against your opponent's best, or do you think your only chance at winning is a mis-match? This will be a huge addition to an alliance's strategy in the elims. Mike 
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| 2004 Championship Eligibility Criteria!!! | dez250 | General Forum | 214 | 28-12-2003 20:11 |
| "Fixing" matches | Shawn60 | General Forum | 158 | 18-03-2003 18:41 |
| Time for new rules! | archiver | 2001 | 11 | 24-06-2002 02:01 |
| Hits, Misses, & Suggestions -- long message | archiver | 2000 | 17 | 23-06-2002 23:36 |
| The Case For 'Regionalizing' teams at the Nationals. | archiver | 2000 | 33 | 23-06-2002 23:35 |
Threaded Mode