|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
pic: look at that!
|
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: pic: look at that!
Do you even fit within the 54" cylinder???
|
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: pic: look at that!
Is this even legit?
|
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
There is no way that fits in the 54in cylinder considering that length of that bar at 68 degrees (i think) is 32in between each lifting bar so if you are on the ground and passing the second bar you must be at least 64 in
|
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: pic: look at that!
I measured yesterday and yes it does fit. With a few inches to spare.
|
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: pic: look at that!
The angle of the picture...my neck hurts from turning it to the left at such an angle.....
|
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: pic: look at that!
how does this not break rule G23-1 a ?http://frc-manual.usfirst.org/Updates/0#term 37
|
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: pic: look at that!
Quote:
Its less than 50 inches from the extended claws to the top of the shooter. I know for sure that it could fit it in the specified 54in diameter cylinder without issue. |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: pic: look at that!
Quote:
Or I could have just done my geometry completely wrong, it is almost 3am. And it would help if this image wasn't at a ridiculous angle. ![]() Last edited by Brandon_L : 15-02-2013 at 02:37. |
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: pic: look at that!
i think your math is off considering the first horazontal bar should be at 30in and also if you look at the first diagram it looks like they would measure it from your drive base upwards as your cylinder
|
|
#11
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: pic: look at that!
Under the clarification given in this blog post, it is legal.
Quote:
The cylinder is not measured relative to the ground. |
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: pic: look at that!
30in in height not 30in from the corner. The cylinder is not relative to drive base. Its not relative to anything, its as long as you can squeeze your robot in. I measured relative to the ground because I'm not there in person with a tape measure, but it looks like even using it relative to the ground it *could* work.
Last edited by Brandon_L : 15-02-2013 at 02:45. |
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: pic: look at that!
thanks for the clarification
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|