|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 4 Wheel Drive Too Much Traction
Can you please explain your thought on this? It's common practice for teams to have robots longer than they are wide - 48 had a (in)famously long robot last year, and they were multiple regional winners. I agree that wider bases have less scrub, but never longer than wide?
|
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 4 Wheel Drive Too Much Traction
Quote:
|
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 4 Wheel Drive Too Much Traction
I think we're going to see alot of robots with this approximate design (chute with indexer, dropping into a linear shooter at a ~30deg angle).
This particular robot seems much heavier than it needs to be though... Why two gearboxes to a side unless you were putting mecanums on it? The whole chassis appears to be steel tube and bent sheet steel, which, might be more viable this year than ever before, with the reduced perimeter, but still. Last edited by Racer26 : 15-02-2013 at 09:24. Reason: fixing unmatched parenthesis |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 4 Wheel Drive Too Much Traction
Quote:
|
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 4 Wheel Drive Too Much Traction
Quote:
For the robot pictured, if you make the following simplifying assumptions: 1) all four wheels identical and driven independently with the same torque... then the analysis becomes straightforward: http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/sh...ad.php?t=99089 JesseK's advice is good though: Quote:
Last edited by Ether : 15-02-2013 at 10:25. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|