Guess my valve!

[Mark McLeod]

I'm not your robot inspector, so I'm not the person to ask.
Chief Delphi isn't an official source.
Without a part number you have difficulty proving that the solenoid meets the Robot rules.

There are other models with the same form factor that would not meet the pneumatics rules requirements, and I'd have to double check that valve's specs against the robot rules.

[zatch bell stev]

well thanks anyway, you were all a huge help.

[cgmv123]

Originally Posted by Mark McLeod

I'm not your robot inspector, so I'm not the person to ask.
Chief Delphi isn't an official source.
Without a part number you might have difficulty proving that the solenoid meets the Robot rules.

There are other models with the same form factor that would not meet the pneumatics rules requirements, and I'd have to double check that valve's specs against the robot rules.

I'd have difficulty believing that isn't an R77 violation as well.

[Dad1279]

http://team358.org/files/pneumatic/F...structions.pdf

As to legality, it was asked on Q&A

Q419 Q. Are the older KoP Festo VPLE18-M5H valve legal for use? The specification from FESTO are obsolete, however these valves were legal in previous FRC seasons.
FRC0997 on 2013-02-04 | 4 Followers
A. To be legal for use, any pneumatic solenoid valve must meet the requirements of all ROBOT Rules, specifically, [R78]-C. Per Section 4.1, the Team is responsible for proving a part's legality during Inspection.

What's the R77 violation?

[cgmv123]

Originally Posted by Dad1279

What's the R77 violation?

I* don't believe a solenoid with a rubbed-off label meets the definition of original, unaltered condition.

*Not an inspector or the GDC.