|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
| Thread Tools |
Rating:
|
Display Modes |
|
#31
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 2013 Alliance Selection Results
Greater Toronto East Regional (ONTO)
1)2056-1114-1325 (W) 2)4343-1241-216 (F) 3)1547-2809-4252 (QF) 4)3541-4001-865 (QF) 5)2013-2994-781 (SF) 6)4476-4718-3985 (SF) 7)3387-2852-3386 (QF) 8)1075-3543-244 (QF) There were no declines Last edited by Kpchem : 09-03-2013 at 17:27. Reason: Updated with results |
|
#32
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: 2013 Alliance Selection Results
I love Waterford High School wi-fi
1) 1718-33-4779 W 2) 2851-3539-1 SF 3) 67-494-308 QF 4) 1025-4130-503 QF 5) 2960-2612-548 SF 6) 51*-3414-3604 F 7) 4384-573-1701 QF 8) 2834-835-2137 QF *Declined 2960 Last edited by Basel A : 09-03-2013 at 21:53. |
|
#33
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2013 Alliance Selection Results
WPI:
1. 2791,20,3182 (F) 2. 1100,558,2370 (SF) 3. 177,126,1884 (QF) 4. 2648,3205,3930 (SF) 5. 121,228,1687,3499 (QF) 6. 2168,3280,3044 (W) 7. 2877,155,1493 (QF) 8. 663,2067,157 (QF) Last edited by robotFish : 09-03-2013 at 16:45. |
|
#34
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2013 Alliance Selection Results
51 declined 2960
|
|
#35
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2013 Alliance Selection Results
I believe 51 declined 2960.
|
|
#37
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2013 Alliance Selection Results
Quote:
|
|
#38
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 2013 Alliance Selection Results
Lone Star Regional
1)118-148-2789 (W) 2)1477-624-4355 (QF) 3)57*-2587-3847 (F) 4)4587-2936-418 (SF) 5)3741-704-2438 (QF) 6)4328-1801-441 (QF) 7)231-192-1429 (SF) 8)3961-2582-3103 (QF) *231 declined 57 Last edited by Kpchem : 09-03-2013 at 17:29. Reason: Updated with results |
|
#39
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2013 Alliance Selection Results
2013 Northern Lights Regional
1st...3056...876...3723 2nd..3130*.2175..1675 3rd...2169*.525...3061 4th...2826*.269...1259 5th...2512*.2861..4762 6th...2518...4623..3055 7th...4624...2502..4656 8th...3184...3293..27 *Teams all declined 3056 Last edited by JohnChristensen : 09-03-2013 at 13:34. |
|
#40
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2013 Alliance Selection Results
4671 also missed being picked by 3130/2175 because they apparently left.
|
|
#41
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 2013 Alliance Selection Results
That must have been fun to watch. Was 3056 really carried that much? Was it an intentional strategy for them to pick the other top teams and have them decline?
|
|
#42
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2013 Alliance Selection Results
1075 called in backup 4727 to replace 244 in QF1-2
|
|
#43
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2013 Alliance Selection Results
Quote:
1100 sat out QF3-2, without being replaced with a backup. Last edited by engunneer : 09-03-2013 at 14:47. |
|
#44
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: 2013 Alliance Selection Results
Yep, sorry for the little mistakes there.
|
|
#45
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2013 Alliance Selection Results
They got a very fortunate schedule having looked at it with 2826, 2512, 2169 (twice). Only match they lost was against 2169 and they were with 876 that match. I'm sure that they deserve to be in elims, but they were very very fortunate to be the number 1 seed.
Last edited by Dr Theta : 09-03-2013 at 15:19. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|