|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||||
|
||||||
|
Re: Texas Rankings
Right now Chairmans, Engineering inspiration and rookie all-star are not point awards in the FIM ranking system. Those awards qualify you for the state championship to compete for those awards but don't impact the rank as they are listed. When texas moves to the district system I am sure there will be many discussions of how this is handled but for now I am going to leave those awards out of the rankings.
|
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Texas Rankings
Under FiM, how many teams make it to the state championship through the ranking system? If a team qualifies for state with a regional chairman's award, does their robot still compete, giving them the chance to qualify for St Louis through competing?
|
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Texas Rankings
All district Chairman's award winners do compete at the state championship with the robot. So they have more options of getting to St. Louis, via 1 of 3 Chairman's spots, winning the state championship or qualifiying based on points. The top 64 teams in the state based on points compete at the state championship. So this year 64/207 teams compete, so about 30% of Michigan teams.
|
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Texas Rankings
Quote:
RCA automatically qualifies your robot to attend the State/Region CMP. EI and RAS were able to attend (sans robot) and set up a booth to compete for those awards. |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Texas Rankings
Greg,
You beat me to it. I kept one of these last year for curiosity sake. Do you have a spreadsheet for the calculations or doing it by hand? Joe Ross and I were visiting about it. I asked him how he would handle teams that compete in more than two tournaments? He is keeping one with an average as well for each team. Very interesting information to look at. I also wonder if the District model will only include Texas. See you in San Antonio at Alamo. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|