|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
We tend to look for someone who has fairly descent standings for our first pick, and then our second pick is usually from the bottom third or so. Any team that makes our 'list' of choices has to show dependability and durability during their qualifying matches, and have a co-operative floor team.
No matter whom may end up being our partner, we will try our best to compete with the best two of three teams in our alliance... meaning, if we think our third partner will do it's best with our second partner, then as alliance captains we will pull ourselves from a match in the finals for that purpose. |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| 2004 Championship Eligibility Criteria!!! | dez250 | General Forum | 214 | 28-12-2003 20:11 |
| Bash at the Beach - DIRECTIONS? | KathieK | Off-Season Events | 3 | 19-09-2003 12:45 |
| 2003 IRI live on the web!! | David Kelly | Off-Season Events | 44 | 22-07-2003 18:21 |
| Hits, Misses, & Suggestions -- long message | archiver | 2000 | 17 | 23-06-2002 23:36 |
| How do we view more teams? | archiver | 2000 | 0 | 23-06-2002 23:11 |