Quote:
Originally Posted by Lil' Lavery
Not going to get into a full OPR rant, but I will briefly mention something about this anecdote. Those OPR figures would only be accurate if those robots were 100% successful in their climbing attempts.
|
From what I've seen it looks like OPR accounts for the "average" number of hang points that a team will get per match, if they hang for 10 points 100% of the time their OPR will be higher than if they hang for 10 points 50% of the time.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Joe Ross
What data did you use to determine it was 90% accurate?
|
"90% accuracy" was probably the wrong phrase for that. To elaborate, OPR ranking had a .9 correlation coefficient with robots actual offensive performance.
The main point that I've been trying to get across is that a good scouting system is irreplaceable, but if you don't have one, OPR is much better than having nothing. I think we can all agree on that.
Yes, you are correct. Even when all other databuses are totally out of bandwith, the PainInTheCalf Bus gets top priority. Good thinking ;-) - Joe Johnson [more] 
25-03-2013, 17:17
Threaded Mode