Go to Post If all else fails, just ask the judges to turn off the gravity! :D - [more]
Home
Go Back   Chief Delphi > FIRST > Rumor Mill
CD-Media   CD-Spy  
portal register members calendar search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read FAQ rules

 
Reply
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #61   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 27-03-2013, 19:16
mott's Avatar
mott mott is offline
Registered User
AKA: Mike Ott
FRC #1619 (Up-A-Creek Robotics)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Rookie Year: 2008
Location: Niwot, CO
Posts: 106
mott is on a distinguished road
Re: Thoughts on whether the size change will be permanent?

Quote:
Originally Posted by savage View Post
The size limit does not bother me its those bumpers that I dont like...
This.

With the new flexibility being granted in determining frame configurations, it would be nice to see similar flexibility in the frame perimeter bumper coverage rules.

For example, a better way to regulate bumper coverage might be something like: "each end of a frame perimeter side must be protected by bumpers covering no less than 25% of the total length of that side or 8 inches, whichever is less" (or something like this).

This would allow you to create an extremely long or short frame edge and still NOT have to completely cover that side with bumpers.
Reply With Quote
  #62   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 27-03-2013, 19:30
Mark Sheridan's Avatar
Mark Sheridan Mark Sheridan is offline
Head Mentor
FRC #3476 (Code Orange)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Rookie Year: 2002
Location: Irvine, CA
Posts: 561
Mark Sheridan has a reputation beyond reputeMark Sheridan has a reputation beyond reputeMark Sheridan has a reputation beyond reputeMark Sheridan has a reputation beyond reputeMark Sheridan has a reputation beyond reputeMark Sheridan has a reputation beyond reputeMark Sheridan has a reputation beyond reputeMark Sheridan has a reputation beyond reputeMark Sheridan has a reputation beyond reputeMark Sheridan has a reputation beyond reputeMark Sheridan has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Thoughts on whether the size change will be permanent?

The perimeter rule created headaches for me this year, but I would imagine next year I would be better prepared for it. What drove me nuts was that the bumpers counted toward the 54" cylinder. Next year either don't count the bumpers or change the cylinder to a square prism. We kept changing our perimeter to better fit in the cylinder, it delayed our build by a week.

I would prefer if the perimeter was a little bit bigger next year at 120" but I think I could deal with the current dimensions.
__________________
Team 3476| Mentor| 2014 - Current
Team 3309| Mentor| 2011 - 2016
Team 766 | Mentor| 2006 - 2011 | Alumnus | 2002-2005
Reply With Quote
  #63   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 27-03-2013, 20:33
ablatner ablatner is offline
Registered User
AKA: Andrew Blatner
FRC #0100 (The Wildhats)
Team Role: Leadership
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Rookie Year: 2009
Location: Redwood City
Posts: 116
ablatner is on a distinguished road
Re: Thoughts on whether the size change will be permanent?

One possible reason for limiting the perimeter to 112" is that at least one dimension will be 28" or less, allowing it to fit through doorways.
Reply With Quote
  #64   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 27-03-2013, 21:21
Bill_B Bill_B is offline
You cannot not make a difference
FRC #2170
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Rookie Year: 2004
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 1,099
Bill_B has a reputation beyond reputeBill_B has a reputation beyond reputeBill_B has a reputation beyond reputeBill_B has a reputation beyond reputeBill_B has a reputation beyond reputeBill_B has a reputation beyond reputeBill_B has a reputation beyond reputeBill_B has a reputation beyond reputeBill_B has a reputation beyond reputeBill_B has a reputation beyond reputeBill_B has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Thoughts on whether the size change will be permanent?

Quote:
Originally Posted by ablatner View Post
One possible reason for limiting the perimeter to 112" is that at least one dimension will be 28" or less, allowing it to fit through doorways.
With bumpers on?

My first reaction to the smaller size was that the intent was to reduce the ease with which the pyramid to side wall passage could be blockaded. With a more open field, we may return to former robot sizing. I like the perimeter rule though. Just increase or decrease to fit the years' floorplan.
__________________
Nature's Fury FLL team 830 - F L eLements
FRC team 2170 - Titanium Tomahawks
Reply With Quote
  #65   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 27-03-2013, 21:49
Mark Sheridan's Avatar
Mark Sheridan Mark Sheridan is offline
Head Mentor
FRC #3476 (Code Orange)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Rookie Year: 2002
Location: Irvine, CA
Posts: 561
Mark Sheridan has a reputation beyond reputeMark Sheridan has a reputation beyond reputeMark Sheridan has a reputation beyond reputeMark Sheridan has a reputation beyond reputeMark Sheridan has a reputation beyond reputeMark Sheridan has a reputation beyond reputeMark Sheridan has a reputation beyond reputeMark Sheridan has a reputation beyond reputeMark Sheridan has a reputation beyond reputeMark Sheridan has a reputation beyond reputeMark Sheridan has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Thoughts on whether the size change will be permanent?

Quote:
Originally Posted by ablatner View Post
One possible reason for limiting the perimeter to 112" is that at least one dimension will be 28" or less, allowing it to fit through doorways.
Thats the smartest thing I heard all day, that totally must be the reason.
__________________
Team 3476| Mentor| 2014 - Current
Team 3309| Mentor| 2011 - 2016
Team 766 | Mentor| 2006 - 2011 | Alumnus | 2002-2005
Reply With Quote
  #66   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 27-03-2013, 21:54
EricH's Avatar
EricH EricH is offline
New year, new team
FRC #1197 (Torbots)
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Rookie Year: 2003
Location: SoCal
Posts: 19,817
EricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Thoughts on whether the size change will be permanent?

Quote:
Originally Posted by ablatner View Post
One possible reason for limiting the perimeter to 112" is that at least one dimension will be 28" or less, allowing it to fit through doorways.
Only if you have a rectangular robot. A circular robot could be 35" in diameter. A triangular robot, if equilateral, could be 37" on a side.

If the perimeter were increased in the future, I think the answer to "How do you fit a robot through a doorway?" will be the same as the answer to "How do you fit a 6' robot in a 5.5' crate?" back in 2007: Plan ahead.
__________________
Past teams:
2003-2007: FRC0330 BeachBots
2008: FRC1135 Shmoebotics
2012: FRC4046 Schroedinger's Dragons

"Rockets are tricky..."--Elon Musk

Reply With Quote
  #67   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 28-03-2013, 00:00
MrForbes's Avatar
MrForbes MrForbes is offline
Registered User
AKA: Jim
FRC #1726 (N.E.R.D.S.)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Rookie Year: 2006
Location: Sierra Vista AZ
Posts: 6,028
MrForbes has a reputation beyond reputeMrForbes has a reputation beyond reputeMrForbes has a reputation beyond reputeMrForbes has a reputation beyond reputeMrForbes has a reputation beyond reputeMrForbes has a reputation beyond reputeMrForbes has a reputation beyond reputeMrForbes has a reputation beyond reputeMrForbes has a reputation beyond reputeMrForbes has a reputation beyond reputeMrForbes has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Thoughts on whether the size change will be permanent?

We shipped our robot to Champs today. A compact little crate, with everything needed to operate and maintain the robot included inside (tools, spare parts, cart, bumpers, operator console, batteries, chargers, etc) and it only weighed 370 pounds including the crate!
Reply With Quote
  #68   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 28-03-2013, 00:08
Bill_B Bill_B is offline
You cannot not make a difference
FRC #2170
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Rookie Year: 2004
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 1,099
Bill_B has a reputation beyond reputeBill_B has a reputation beyond reputeBill_B has a reputation beyond reputeBill_B has a reputation beyond reputeBill_B has a reputation beyond reputeBill_B has a reputation beyond reputeBill_B has a reputation beyond reputeBill_B has a reputation beyond reputeBill_B has a reputation beyond reputeBill_B has a reputation beyond reputeBill_B has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Thoughts on whether the size change will be permanent?

Quote:
Originally Posted by MrForbes View Post
We shipped our robot to Champs today. A compact little crate, with everything needed to operate and maintain the robot included inside (tools, spare parts, cart, bumpers, operator console, batteries, chargers, etc) and it only weighed 370 pounds including the crate!
point of curiosity - was it in a bag too?
__________________
Nature's Fury FLL team 830 - F L eLements
FRC team 2170 - Titanium Tomahawks
Reply With Quote
  #69   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 28-03-2013, 00:12
MrForbes's Avatar
MrForbes MrForbes is offline
Registered User
AKA: Jim
FRC #1726 (N.E.R.D.S.)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Rookie Year: 2006
Location: Sierra Vista AZ
Posts: 6,028
MrForbes has a reputation beyond reputeMrForbes has a reputation beyond reputeMrForbes has a reputation beyond reputeMrForbes has a reputation beyond reputeMrForbes has a reputation beyond reputeMrForbes has a reputation beyond reputeMrForbes has a reputation beyond reputeMrForbes has a reputation beyond reputeMrForbes has a reputation beyond reputeMrForbes has a reputation beyond reputeMrForbes has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Thoughts on whether the size change will be permanent?

Yes, the robot is locked up in it's bag, inside the crate. And the lockup form is in a protective sleeve, taped to the outside of the bag.
Reply With Quote
  #70   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 28-03-2013, 07:34
Zuelu562's Avatar
Zuelu562 Zuelu562 is offline
Ready for WPI District!
AKA: Jake Janssens
FRC #3623 (Terror Bots)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Rookie Year: 2008
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 340
Zuelu562 is a splendid one to beholdZuelu562 is a splendid one to beholdZuelu562 is a splendid one to beholdZuelu562 is a splendid one to beholdZuelu562 is a splendid one to beholdZuelu562 is a splendid one to beholdZuelu562 is a splendid one to beholdZuelu562 is a splendid one to behold
Re: Thoughts on whether the size change will be permanent?

I liked the perimeter restriction on the whole. I don't like the current number, and as many have pointed out, is likely a very specific rule for this game. The rule of the perimeter restriction allows more diverse robots, because you aren't in "lets use every last inch they give us" mode.

For my team (and several others I saw at WPI), the creative usage of space, especially for electronics, was a cool side effect. Our robot had 3 hinged lexan panes with electronics on them!

I'm personally anticipating the GDC's next move here. I'm of the mind that the NUMBER is the rule that leaves. I think the perimeter measuring rule is here to stay.
__________________
Team Resume
562 "S.P.A.R.K." - Student Programmer 2008-2011, Field Coach 2011
3623 "Terror Bots" - Technical Mentor, Field Coach 2012 - Present

Volunteer Resume:
BattleCry@WPI 12, 13, 15, 16 - Queuing
BattleCry@WPI 14 - Field Reset
Granite State District Event 2014 - Team Queueing
NEFIRST District Championships '14,'15,'16 - Team Queuing
Reply With Quote
  #71   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 28-03-2013, 20:09
Unsung FIRST Hero
Al Skierkiewicz Al Skierkiewicz is offline
Broadcast Eng/Chief Robot Inspector
AKA: Big Al WFFA 2005
FRC #0111 (WildStang)
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Rookie Year: 1996
Location: Wheeling, IL
Posts: 10,798
Al Skierkiewicz has a reputation beyond reputeAl Skierkiewicz has a reputation beyond reputeAl Skierkiewicz has a reputation beyond reputeAl Skierkiewicz has a reputation beyond reputeAl Skierkiewicz has a reputation beyond reputeAl Skierkiewicz has a reputation beyond reputeAl Skierkiewicz has a reputation beyond reputeAl Skierkiewicz has a reputation beyond reputeAl Skierkiewicz has a reputation beyond reputeAl Skierkiewicz has a reputation beyond reputeAl Skierkiewicz has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Thoughts on whether the size change will be permanent?

Quote:
Originally Posted by mott View Post
For example, a better way to regulate bumper coverage might be something like: "each end of a frame perimeter side must be protected by bumpers covering no less than 25% of the total length of that side or 8 inches, whichever is less" (or something like this).
Mike,
Could that allow a team to not have bumpers on the corners making that part of the frame a weapon? One of our tests for bumpers is being able to punch the corner and not feel anything hard. The whole point in bumpers is to prevent robot damage.
__________________
Good Luck All. Learn something new, everyday!
Al
WB9UVJ
www.wildstang.org
________________________
Storming the Tower since 1996.
Reply With Quote
  #72   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 28-03-2013, 20:29
EricH's Avatar
EricH EricH is offline
New year, new team
FRC #1197 (Torbots)
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Rookie Year: 2003
Location: SoCal
Posts: 19,817
EricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Thoughts on whether the size change will be permanent?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Al Skierkiewicz View Post
Mike,
Could that allow a team to not have bumpers on the corners making that part of the frame a weapon? One of our tests for bumpers is being able to punch the corner and not feel anything hard. The whole point in bumpers is to prevent robot damage.
I think that what he's trying to say could be better expressed as:

"Each side of each corner of the frame perimeter shall be covered by bumpers with a length at least 8" or 25% of the length of the side, whichever is less."

Example: A team has a 16" side, for whatever reason. It is next to a 36" side (I'm not assuming any particular bumper perimeter length). The 16" side, under current rules, needs to be entirely covered by bumpers; the 36" side is slightly less than half covered by bumpers. The rule change suggested would allow the 16" side to use 4" bumper lengths on each end, rather than 8". However, the 36" side would still be constrained to 8" minimum length bumpers, as 25% of 36" is 9". Any bumper less than 4" long on the 16" side, or less than 8" long on the 36" side, is a violation of the rule.

BTW, Al, if you have any input into this: I'd LOVE to see the frame perimeter measurement kept as the size rule. Changing the size is relatively simple, and it opens up a lot of odd frame shapes.
__________________
Past teams:
2003-2007: FRC0330 BeachBots
2008: FRC1135 Shmoebotics
2012: FRC4046 Schroedinger's Dragons

"Rockets are tricky..."--Elon Musk

Reply With Quote
  #73   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 28-03-2013, 21:01
Daniel_LaFleur's Avatar
Daniel_LaFleur Daniel_LaFleur is offline
Mad Scientist
AKA: Me
FRC #2040 (DERT)
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Rookie Year: 2003
Location: Peoria, IL
Posts: 1,976
Daniel_LaFleur has a reputation beyond reputeDaniel_LaFleur has a reputation beyond reputeDaniel_LaFleur has a reputation beyond reputeDaniel_LaFleur has a reputation beyond reputeDaniel_LaFleur has a reputation beyond reputeDaniel_LaFleur has a reputation beyond reputeDaniel_LaFleur has a reputation beyond reputeDaniel_LaFleur has a reputation beyond reputeDaniel_LaFleur has a reputation beyond reputeDaniel_LaFleur has a reputation beyond reputeDaniel_LaFleur has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via MSN to Daniel_LaFleur
Re: Thoughts on whether the size change will be permanent?

Quote:
Originally Posted by mott View Post
This.

With the new flexibility being granted in determining frame configurations, it would be nice to see similar flexibility in the frame perimeter bumper coverage rules.

For example, a better way to regulate bumper coverage might be something like: "each end of a frame perimeter side must be protected by bumpers covering no less than 25% of the total length of that side or 8 inches, whichever is less" (or something like this).

This would allow you to create an extremely long or short frame edge and still NOT have to completely cover that side with bumpers.
... And what about a circular robot (has no 'end' or 'side')?

The difficulty in these rules is not with the standard shaped robots, but in the 'out of the box' designs.
__________________
___________________
"We are not now that strength which in old days moved earth and heaven; that which we are, we are;
One equal temper of heroic hearts, Made weak by time and fate, but strong in will
To strive, to seek, to find, and not to yield. "
- Tennyson, Ulysses
Reply With Quote
  #74   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 28-03-2013, 21:19
Unsung FIRST Hero
Al Skierkiewicz Al Skierkiewicz is offline
Broadcast Eng/Chief Robot Inspector
AKA: Big Al WFFA 2005
FRC #0111 (WildStang)
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Rookie Year: 1996
Location: Wheeling, IL
Posts: 10,798
Al Skierkiewicz has a reputation beyond reputeAl Skierkiewicz has a reputation beyond reputeAl Skierkiewicz has a reputation beyond reputeAl Skierkiewicz has a reputation beyond reputeAl Skierkiewicz has a reputation beyond reputeAl Skierkiewicz has a reputation beyond reputeAl Skierkiewicz has a reputation beyond reputeAl Skierkiewicz has a reputation beyond reputeAl Skierkiewicz has a reputation beyond reputeAl Skierkiewicz has a reputation beyond reputeAl Skierkiewicz has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Thoughts on whether the size change will be permanent?

Erik and Daniel,
Previous rules did not put a serious restriction on shape or really dimension. The 28" limit that all year's rules have included is simply to insure that robots can make it through a standard door opening. This is an issue many people forget. Many venues have large overhead doors but those are generally not open for use during the event. Some venues that have large openings require building staff to be present to operate the door. That is often cost prohibitive for the event. (imagine paying a building engineer overtime for 12 hours on a Saturday)
__________________
Good Luck All. Learn something new, everyday!
Al
WB9UVJ
www.wildstang.org
________________________
Storming the Tower since 1996.
Reply With Quote
  #75   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 30-03-2013, 09:45
NobleActual NobleActual is offline
NobleActual
FRC #0696 (Circuit Breakers)
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Rookie Year: 2012
Location: Mars, coordinates 4.59S / 137.44 E
Posts: 6
NobleActual is an unknown quantity at this point
Re: Thoughts on whether the size change will be permanent?

I personally like the size requirements being narrowed, it really provides a new type of challenge for teams, and in some instances helps level out the player field. Teams generally had to make a choice between a good climber or shooter. Of course, there are those teams that manage to do everything very well, but they are far and few between. I also think the designs have been incredibly varied because of the weight limit, which is great because looking at other team's robots and ideas, I find myself amazed at what some teams come up with. All in All, I support the size change, and would like the robots to stay similar sizes in the future
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 17:30.

The Chief Delphi Forums are sponsored by Innovation First International, Inc.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi