Go to Post AND... ...GET OFF MY LAWN! You young whippersnappers. dang nabit... - Joe Johnson [more]
Home
Go Back   Chief Delphi > FIRST > General Forum
CD-Media   CD-Spy  
portal register members calendar search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read FAQ rules

 
Reply
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #16   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 30-03-2013, 21:18
EricLeifermann's Avatar
EricLeifermann EricLeifermann is online now
That was a short break
FRC #2826 (Wave Robotics)
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Rookie Year: 2001
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 1,071
EricLeifermann has a reputation beyond reputeEricLeifermann has a reputation beyond reputeEricLeifermann has a reputation beyond reputeEricLeifermann has a reputation beyond reputeEricLeifermann has a reputation beyond reputeEricLeifermann has a reputation beyond reputeEricLeifermann has a reputation beyond reputeEricLeifermann has a reputation beyond reputeEricLeifermann has a reputation beyond reputeEricLeifermann has a reputation beyond reputeEricLeifermann has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Climbing Speed Ranking

Quote:
Originally Posted by themccannman View Post
I'm pretty sure as of right now the fastest climbing teams are 254, 1114, 1986, and 118 in that order. That's just what I've seen though there are probably others that are faster that I haven' seen.
Unless I've missed them climbing, 118 hasn't gone above 10. (they removed their 30 point climber, unless they put it back on)
__________________
2002-2005 Appleton East High School: Team 93
2005-2011 Michigan Technological University: Team 857
2012-Present Wave Robotics Team 2826



Reply With Quote
  #17   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 30-03-2013, 21:22
DanielCH's Avatar
DanielCH DanielCH is offline
Registered User
FRC #0295 (Renevatio)
Team Role: Driver
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Rookie Year: 2010
Location: Granite Bay
Posts: 30
DanielCH is an unknown quantity at this point
Re: Climbing Speed Ranking

Quote:
Originally Posted by EricLeifermann View Post
Unless I've missed them climbing, 118 hasn't gone above 10. (they removed their 30 point climber, unless they put it back on)
On the same note, 254 has never climbed to 30 pts in competition either. Both 118 and 254 have displayed the ability to do so on their practice field, but it hasn't been seen in the wild, as they say. As of March 30th, 1114 has the world's fastest, verified competition legal, climber (as far as I know).
__________________
Quote:
I guess true innovation is when you can actually harness physics to do what you want. Heck -- that sounds suspiciously like engineering.
-- JVN
Reply With Quote
  #18   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 30-03-2013, 22:14
BrendanB BrendanB is offline
Registered User
AKA: Brendan Browne
FRC #1058 (PVC Pirates)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Rookie Year: 2003
Location: Londonderry, NH
Posts: 3,104
BrendanB has a reputation beyond reputeBrendanB has a reputation beyond reputeBrendanB has a reputation beyond reputeBrendanB has a reputation beyond reputeBrendanB has a reputation beyond reputeBrendanB has a reputation beyond reputeBrendanB has a reputation beyond reputeBrendanB has a reputation beyond reputeBrendanB has a reputation beyond reputeBrendanB has a reputation beyond reputeBrendanB has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Climbing Speed Ranking

At GSR we (3467) climbed in 40 seconds. For Pine Tree next week we enhanced our climbing code and are now in the 20-25 second range. We shall see the official time next week.
__________________
1519 Mechanical M.A.Y.H.E.M. 2008 - 2010
3467 Windham Windup 2011 - 2015
1058 PVC Pirates 2016 - xxxx
Reply With Quote
  #19   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 30-03-2013, 22:35
SteveGPage's Avatar
SteveGPage SteveGPage is online now
Mentor - Scouting and Strategy
AKA: Steve
FRC #0836 (RoboBees)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Rookie Year: 2004
Location: Hollywood, MD
Posts: 523
SteveGPage has a reputation beyond reputeSteveGPage has a reputation beyond reputeSteveGPage has a reputation beyond reputeSteveGPage has a reputation beyond reputeSteveGPage has a reputation beyond reputeSteveGPage has a reputation beyond reputeSteveGPage has a reputation beyond reputeSteveGPage has a reputation beyond reputeSteveGPage has a reputation beyond reputeSteveGPage has a reputation beyond reputeSteveGPage has a reputation beyond repute
We climbed to 30 in about half our matches at DC this weekend. After some code modifications and adjustments, I believe we were in the 20 - 25 second range. I'll have to get the video and get a good timing for the climbs. I'm sure we'll post the videos to our YouTube channel by early next week.
__________________
FRC 836, The RoboBees www.robobees.org
growingSTEMS www.growingSTEMS.org
2017: Southwest VA, Northern MD, Chesapeake District Championships, Championships
Reply With Quote
  #20   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 30-03-2013, 23:12
Mr. Lim Mr. Lim is offline
Registered User
AKA: Mr. Lim
no team
Team Role: Leadership
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Rookie Year: 1998
Location: Toronto, Ontario
Posts: 1,125
Mr. Lim has a reputation beyond reputeMr. Lim has a reputation beyond reputeMr. Lim has a reputation beyond reputeMr. Lim has a reputation beyond reputeMr. Lim has a reputation beyond reputeMr. Lim has a reputation beyond reputeMr. Lim has a reputation beyond reputeMr. Lim has a reputation beyond reputeMr. Lim has a reputation beyond reputeMr. Lim has a reputation beyond reputeMr. Lim has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Climbing Speed Ranking

GTRW Finalist 1334 has a sub-20 second climb and dump for 50 points.

http://watchfirstnow.com/archive3.php?id=63000921

They start their climb at approx 37 left, and complete it with about 18 left.

They qualified for CMP by both a wildcard for being finalists, and more importantly for winning EI at GTRW.

They also had a student, Sam Thompson win Dean's List, and also won the Imagery Award.

Needless to say, it was a VERY good tournament for this great team!
__________________
In life, what you give, you keep. What you fail to give, you lose forever...
Reply With Quote
  #21   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 30-03-2013, 23:18
Kevin Leonard Kevin Leonard is offline
Professional Stat Padder
FRC #5254 (HYPE), FRC #20 (The Rocketeers)
Team Role: College Student
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Rookie Year: 2011
Location: Upstate New York
Posts: 1,254
Kevin Leonard has a reputation beyond reputeKevin Leonard has a reputation beyond reputeKevin Leonard has a reputation beyond reputeKevin Leonard has a reputation beyond reputeKevin Leonard has a reputation beyond reputeKevin Leonard has a reputation beyond reputeKevin Leonard has a reputation beyond reputeKevin Leonard has a reputation beyond reputeKevin Leonard has a reputation beyond reputeKevin Leonard has a reputation beyond reputeKevin Leonard has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Climbing Speed Ranking

At Connecticut today, team 2170, the Titanium Tomahawks had a CRAZY eliminations match where they went to climb with 20 second left (when it normally takes them like 30-40) and they got to the top and probably would have gotten points from a dump too except that the pyramid goal bottom opened up and the discs fell through. Luckily those discs would not have made a difference in the final outcome of the match, but the climb itself was impressive.
Reply With Quote
  #22   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 31-03-2013, 08:12
Wayne TenBrink's Avatar
Wayne TenBrink Wayne TenBrink is offline
<< (2008 Game Piece)
FRC #1918 (NC Gears)
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Rookie Year: 2006
Location: Fremont, MI, USA
Posts: 528
Wayne TenBrink has a reputation beyond reputeWayne TenBrink has a reputation beyond reputeWayne TenBrink has a reputation beyond reputeWayne TenBrink has a reputation beyond reputeWayne TenBrink has a reputation beyond reputeWayne TenBrink has a reputation beyond reputeWayne TenBrink has a reputation beyond reputeWayne TenBrink has a reputation beyond reputeWayne TenBrink has a reputation beyond reputeWayne TenBrink has a reputation beyond reputeWayne TenBrink has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Climbing Speed Ranking

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jeffy View Post
A good definition of when a climb starts will certainly be needed for an accurate comparison. In 254's video, they start it the first time the bot moves above the ground, but it takes them time to first get under the pyramid, line up, and deploy the hooks upwards before the climb starts. Similar scenarios happen on other bots, some line up faster than others.
Sort of sounds like minibot climb time vs deployment + climb.
A meaningful definition might be "When do you need to stop shooting and commit to climbing?"

You could start the clock when the robot leaves level zero and stop it when the robot exits level 2. That is an "objective" definition, but it doesn't really tell the whole story. There are no extra points for getting to the top first (like minibots), but if a fast climb means you can run one or two more cycles, then that matters. What really defines the start of the climb is when you stop playing "the rest of the game" and devote yourself to climbing. The climb clock stops when the match ends. You could go from level 0 to 3 in two seconds, but if you quit shooting discs at 60 seconds, spend 20 seconds lining up, and then sit at the top for 28 seconds, you are no better off than somebody who quit shooting at 60, lined up in 5, climbed in 50, and sat for 5. What is important is that you know how much time you need (less is better), and you make the most of the remaining time.

It also matters whether or not you are carrying discs to the top. That adds the transit & loading time to your cycle, but the payoff is pretty good. How long does it take to unload the discs at the top (1334 beats 1114 on this one)? How many "cycles" can you turn before you need to load the colored discs?

As for our robot, it takes about 25 seconds from when we exit level 0 until we exit level 2. However, our true "climb cycle" starts at the pyramid when we unload white discs and decide what to do next. We need about 65 seconds to go get the colored discs, line up, climb, & dump.
__________________
NC Gears (Newaygo County Geeks Engineering Awesome Robotic Solutions)

FRC 1918 (Competing at St. Joseph and West MI in 2017)
FTC 6043 & 7911

Last edited by Wayne TenBrink : 31-03-2013 at 13:24. Reason: 1334 was who I was thinking, not 1332
Reply With Quote
  #23   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 31-03-2013, 13:22
GeorgeM's Avatar
GeorgeM GeorgeM is offline
FRC #610 Alumni
FRC #1310
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Rookie Year: 2008
Location: Toronto
Posts: 28
GeorgeM is a splendid one to beholdGeorgeM is a splendid one to beholdGeorgeM is a splendid one to beholdGeorgeM is a splendid one to beholdGeorgeM is a splendid one to beholdGeorgeM is a splendid one to behold
Re: Climbing Speed Ranking

The Cyber Gnomes, Team 2013, after fixing a few things - we're able to consistently cycle twice and 30pt climb at the 45 second mark during GTRW. I would say that after lining up for the climb it takes them 10 seconds per level.

This consistency, mixed with an okay schedule, landed them 4th place before alliance selections.

They teamed up with 1241 and 1325 to make for a killer combo to take them to the semi finals where they met their demise to the hands of 1310 (finalists at Waterloo), Peacock, and of course the "Smoothest Climber", 1334.

We're going to see a lot of 30pt and even 50pt climbers in the finals matches of each division at champs.
Reply With Quote
  #24   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 31-03-2013, 13:33
zackgratti's Avatar
zackgratti zackgratti is offline
Registered User
FRC #2851 (crevolution)
Team Role: Driver
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Rookie Year: 2011
Location: sterling heights
Posts: 5
zackgratti is an unknown quantity at this point
Re: Climbing Speed Ranking

I think 453 can do it in roughly 15seconds
Reply With Quote
  #25   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 31-03-2013, 17:29
jspatz1's Avatar
jspatz1 jspatz1 is offline
Registered User
AKA: Jeff
FRC #1986 (Team Titanium)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Rookie Year: 2007
Location: Lee's Summit, MO
Posts: 836
jspatz1 has a reputation beyond reputejspatz1 has a reputation beyond reputejspatz1 has a reputation beyond reputejspatz1 has a reputation beyond reputejspatz1 has a reputation beyond reputejspatz1 has a reputation beyond reputejspatz1 has a reputation beyond reputejspatz1 has a reputation beyond reputejspatz1 has a reputation beyond reputejspatz1 has a reputation beyond reputejspatz1 has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to jspatz1
Re: Climbing Speed Ranking

Quote:
Originally Posted by jspatz1 View Post
The video measures 17 sec.
....during a practice match. Based on these two competition videos I would adjust that to 18 sec.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature...XbddE#t=11 0s
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature...WMLYg#t=10 8s

I would offer the excuse that we were having some stuttering trouble during the lift from field comm. issues.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #26   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 01-04-2013, 00:06
fox46's Avatar
fox46 fox46 is offline
Registered User
FRC #2013 (Cybergnomes)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Rookie Year: 2000
Location: Toronto, ON, Canada
Posts: 400
fox46 has a reputation beyond reputefox46 has a reputation beyond reputefox46 has a reputation beyond reputefox46 has a reputation beyond reputefox46 has a reputation beyond reputefox46 has a reputation beyond reputefox46 has a reputation beyond reputefox46 has a reputation beyond reputefox46 has a reputation beyond reputefox46 has a reputation beyond reputefox46 has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Climbing Speed Ranking

Wayne is right--

Climb time means nothing if it takes you the entire match to line up. If you are counting from the second we grab the first bar to the second we clear the 20 pt zone, our climb takes 20 seconds at full throttle.

BUT - this is entirely negating that when I see the clock hit 60 seconds left, I was alerting the drivers to finish their run of discs and make their way to the bottom of the leg. Some climbs were a "drive up and deploy the climber" kind of occurance whereas others were "drive up and futz around for 20 seconds before hitting the gas.

In many cases, some 10 point robots which take 2 seconds to lift off the ground could not for the life of them line up which meant they were unable to hang. Even 254 executes this type of hang before climbing and the video does not show this. - Yes it's an incredible mechanism, BUT if they can't get it lined up and off the ground then they aren't going to be making the 30 points.

Remember that teaser videos are all filmed under "ideal" conditions and are not always representative of actual performance. Case in point- I recently read a post that 118 had removed part of their climber and was only pulling 10s - very contrary to their reveal video.
__________________
Mentor, Team 2013 Cybergnomes 2010 - 2014, 2016
Mentor, Team 3756 RamFerno 2011 - 2013
Mentor, Team 854 Iron Bears 2005-2007
Founding member, Team 854 Iron Bears 2000-2005

Mech.Eng.+Mgt University of Ontario 2009
B.Ed OCT Trent University 2015
Professional Education and Product Knowledge Consultant - Toyota Canada Inc.

Last edited by fox46 : 01-04-2013 at 00:12.
Reply With Quote
  #27   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 01-04-2013, 11:48
jspatz1's Avatar
jspatz1 jspatz1 is offline
Registered User
AKA: Jeff
FRC #1986 (Team Titanium)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Rookie Year: 2007
Location: Lee's Summit, MO
Posts: 836
jspatz1 has a reputation beyond reputejspatz1 has a reputation beyond reputejspatz1 has a reputation beyond reputejspatz1 has a reputation beyond reputejspatz1 has a reputation beyond reputejspatz1 has a reputation beyond reputejspatz1 has a reputation beyond reputejspatz1 has a reputation beyond reputejspatz1 has a reputation beyond reputejspatz1 has a reputation beyond reputejspatz1 has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to jspatz1
Re: Climbing Speed Ranking

+1 to Wayne and Fox46's points. Obviously climbing speed is irrelevent if it is dependent upon a lengthy positioning or configuration process. We are enjoying the format that places us in the ideal climb start position when shooting. For a 30-point climb we would like to have the final disk out with at least 22 sec. remaining so we can make one movement before engaging the bar.
Reply With Quote
  #28   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 01-04-2013, 12:50
Mastonevich's Avatar
Mastonevich Mastonevich is offline
Andrew
AKA: Andrew Elsen
FRC #1987 (BroncoBots)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Rookie Year: 2010
Location: Missouri
Posts: 221
Mastonevich is a jewel in the roughMastonevich is a jewel in the roughMastonevich is a jewel in the rough
Re: Climbing Speed Ranking

Quote:
Originally Posted by jspatz1 View Post
+1 to Wayne and Fox46's points. Obviously climbing speed is irrelevant if it is dependent upon a lengthy positioning or configuration process. We are enjoying the format that places us in the ideal climb start position when shooting. For a 30-point climb we would like to have the final disk out with at least 22 sec. remaining so we can make one movement before engaging the bar.
Does the timer start from the point of commitment to start climbing then?

I am not sure we will really ever get consistent comparisons if that is the goal. What I do know is it was many teams goal to reach the top quickly, and teams like 1114 and 1986 have definitely succeeded. Congratulations to all who had success in climbing this year.
__________________
~Andrew

Regional Chairman's: 2013-Alamo, 2010-Oklahoma, 2009-Colorado
Engineering Inspiration: 2016-Hub City, 2012-St. Louis, 2008-Minnesota
Regional Wins: 2010-Oklahoma
Reply With Quote
  #29   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 01-04-2013, 15:02
JRader's Avatar
JRader JRader is offline
Team lead
AKA: Joe Rader
FRC #3496 (RoboTech Collection)
Team Role: Teacher
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Rookie Year: 2001
Location: Columbus Ohio
Posts: 4
JRader is an unknown quantity at this point
Re: Climbing Speed Ranking

3496 climed and scored top goal in 35-40 seconds only missing one climb in quals and quarter finals. total of 340 climb points.
Reply With Quote
  #30   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 02-04-2013, 05:34
protoserge's Avatar
protoserge protoserge is offline
CAD, machining, circuits, fun!
AKA: Some call me... Tim?
FRC #0365 (MOE) & former 836 Mentor)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Rookie Year: 2002
Location: Wilmington, DE
Posts: 754
protoserge has a reputation beyond reputeprotoserge has a reputation beyond reputeprotoserge has a reputation beyond reputeprotoserge has a reputation beyond reputeprotoserge has a reputation beyond reputeprotoserge has a reputation beyond reputeprotoserge has a reputation beyond reputeprotoserge has a reputation beyond reputeprotoserge has a reputation beyond reputeprotoserge has a reputation beyond reputeprotoserge has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Climbing Speed Ranking

Quote:
Originally Posted by SteveGPage View Post
We climbed to 30 in about half our matches at DC this weekend. After some code modifications and adjustments, I believe we were in the 20 - 25 second range. I'll have to get the video and get a good timing for the climbs. I'm sure we'll post the videos to our YouTube channel by early next week.
http://youtu.be/JwLPrD7ycHw?t=2m12s

Playlist (I had a Windows update restart in the middle of my upload... wait a few days for the rest to be up there) :

http://www.youtube.com/playlist?list...AatQRKu5-bH0AE

Here is a closeup of how the ascent system works:

http://youtu.be/yW0uZyK9Rsk

The extension of the "skyhook" is manual. We are working on automating the process for more speed. We are currently software limiting the speed for robot safety.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 19:14.

The Chief Delphi Forums are sponsored by Innovation First International, Inc.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi