|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Supershifters and Mechanum wheels
What was your driver interface? e.g. something this this:
forward/reverse Joystick1 Y axis... or something else? |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Supershifters and Mechanum wheels
Just to add to this conversation...unless it is a particularly special case (2011 our first pick at north Carolina had them) , any team with mecanum wheels is automatically off our pick list. In fact the only thing our pit scouts do is create a list of all mecanum robots.
|
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Supershifters and Mechanum wheels
Quote:
The only disadvantage I have seen with them is that they are relatively slow strafing versus a swerve. Our interface was with one joystick (easier and less confusing) with the top two left and right buttons for rotation. We simply put a constant that we were comfortable with. And they are a simple easy option for relatively new teams for omindirectional movement. Swerve requires a lot of resources, and frankly with a few sacrifices, mecanum is right up there with them... |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Supershifters and Mechanum wheels
Quote:
|
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Supershifters and Mechanum wheels
Quote:
Another huge issue I have is that the majority of teams do not program them to be able to take advantage of the few benefits which makes them even less beneficial. Way too many teams drive mecanum robots like a traditional skid-steer robot and only strafe occasionally or never at all. In my opinion, mecanum wheels are a compromise of all things and don't excel at anything. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|