Go to Post If chairs really inspired me that much I would be in woodcrafting club and not robotics - CJ_Elliott [more]
Home
Go Back   Chief Delphi > Competition > Rules/Strategy
CD-Media   CD-Spy  
portal register members calendar search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read FAQ rules

 
Closed Thread
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #91   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 10-04-2013, 21:50
pfreivald's Avatar
pfreivald pfreivald is offline
Registered User
AKA: Patrick Freivald
FRC #1551 (The Grapes of Wrath)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Rookie Year: 2001
Location: Naples, NY
Posts: 2,306
pfreivald has a reputation beyond reputepfreivald has a reputation beyond reputepfreivald has a reputation beyond reputepfreivald has a reputation beyond reputepfreivald has a reputation beyond reputepfreivald has a reputation beyond reputepfreivald has a reputation beyond reputepfreivald has a reputation beyond reputepfreivald has a reputation beyond reputepfreivald has a reputation beyond reputepfreivald has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Winning a Match vs. Winning Strategically

Quote:
Originally Posted by ewcr View Post
Losing the final match of my senior left a pretty awful taste in my mouth.
How very sad.
__________________
Patrick Freivald -- Mentor
Team 1551
"The Grapes of Wrath"
Bausch & Lomb, PTC Corporation, and Naples High School

I write books, too!
  #92   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 11-04-2013, 09:50
karomata's Avatar
karomata karomata is offline
Rebellious Egyptian
AKA: Mo Elhelw
no team
Team Role: Alumni
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Rookie Year: 2006
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 212
karomata has much to be proud ofkaromata has much to be proud ofkaromata has much to be proud ofkaromata has much to be proud ofkaromata has much to be proud ofkaromata has much to be proud ofkaromata has much to be proud ofkaromata has much to be proud of
Re: Winning a Match vs. Winning Strategically

Quote:
Originally Posted by pandamonium View Post
This is a very interesting debate and I would like first to add a rule specifically and clearly stating that the act of throwing a match is unethical.
Another example of similar importance is how predictable alliance selections now are. At 10:00 on Saturday the top teams all sit in corners with each other and through the act of back door deals or whatever you would like to call them many alliances are pre arranged.
This is commonly because many better teams hope to do well in eliminations, and typically when winging alliance selections can tend to fall way out of hand. Unless your 2056 and 1114, then it is assumed before the regional that you will work together (and probably win).
__________________
Mo Elhelw
FRC 1511 Rolling Thunder 10th Season Team Captain

Check out this awesome scouting project I've been working over the past year called FMS Scouting:
http://www.chiefdelphi.com/media/papers/3002
If you're tired of needing 6 people to scout or just don't have the resources, FMS Scouting is for you!

"The FIRST rule of FIRST Robotics is always talk about FIRST Robotics"
"Life's not linear"
2014 Finger Lakes Regional Chairman's Award Winner
2014 New York Tech Valley Regional Engineering Inspiration Winner
2013 Boston Regional Winners with 125 and 126
2012 Connecticut Regional Engineering Inspiration Winner
2011 DC Regional Chairman's Winners[/size]
  #93   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 11-04-2013, 10:33
rick.oliver's Avatar
rick.oliver rick.oliver is offline
Mentor - Retired
AKA: Pap
no team
Team Role: Alumni
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Rookie Year: 2003
Location: Liberty Township, OH
Posts: 249
rick.oliver has a reputation beyond reputerick.oliver has a reputation beyond reputerick.oliver has a reputation beyond reputerick.oliver has a reputation beyond reputerick.oliver has a reputation beyond reputerick.oliver has a reputation beyond reputerick.oliver has a reputation beyond reputerick.oliver has a reputation beyond reputerick.oliver has a reputation beyond reputerick.oliver has a reputation beyond reputerick.oliver has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Winning a Match vs. Winning Strategically

In the context of the seeding system in place this year and the scenario described in the original post, I maintain, as I stated in my initial post that for me personally the choice is clear - I play to win every match.

When the seeding criteria create the motivation to score for your opponent in certain situations; then, I also have no problem. Aim High was a good example of that scenario.

When the seeding criteria create the motivation to cooperate with opponents to control the outcome of the match and it is in everyone's best interest to play, for example 6v0, well I would not criticize teams for pursuing that strategy. It never came up for me that year; if approached by all five other teams, I probably would have cooperated and still slept well that night

I could imagine a scenario where losing their last match would put a team in a better position for alliance selection without impacting the ranking of alliance partners or opponents. If I were clever enough to recognize it in the first place, I want to believe that I would not support such strategy by our team. I hope that we would play to win. That would be a personal choice based on my value system. I also would not criticize another who made a different choice. While I would strongly lobby against it, if that was the consensus of my team, I could support it. Under no circumstances would I accept a "bribe" as it were to throw a match.
  #94   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 12-04-2013, 09:03
Bill_B Bill_B is offline
You cannot not make a difference
FRC #2170
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Rookie Year: 2004
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 1,099
Bill_B has a reputation beyond reputeBill_B has a reputation beyond reputeBill_B has a reputation beyond reputeBill_B has a reputation beyond reputeBill_B has a reputation beyond reputeBill_B has a reputation beyond reputeBill_B has a reputation beyond reputeBill_B has a reputation beyond reputeBill_B has a reputation beyond reputeBill_B has a reputation beyond reputeBill_B has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Winning a Match vs. Winning Strategically

This is all further complicated by the onset of the district systems and point values for the placings at district events. In the later Quals, some teams will be looking at possibly their last chances to get points for DCMPs. If a single team's performance were so significant as to be able to control the outcome of one match, they would risk additional loss of reputation by their sub-par performance. I don't recall why it's called sand-bagging, but I think the NHRA has rules about dragster running times that deal with too large a variation.
__________________
Nature's Fury FLL team 830 - F L eLements
FRC team 2170 - Titanium Tomahawks
  #95   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 12-04-2013, 14:17
rick.oliver's Avatar
rick.oliver rick.oliver is offline
Mentor - Retired
AKA: Pap
no team
Team Role: Alumni
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Rookie Year: 2003
Location: Liberty Township, OH
Posts: 249
rick.oliver has a reputation beyond reputerick.oliver has a reputation beyond reputerick.oliver has a reputation beyond reputerick.oliver has a reputation beyond reputerick.oliver has a reputation beyond reputerick.oliver has a reputation beyond reputerick.oliver has a reputation beyond reputerick.oliver has a reputation beyond reputerick.oliver has a reputation beyond reputerick.oliver has a reputation beyond reputerick.oliver has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Winning a Match vs. Winning Strategically

The best way to ensure that each team plays to win every match is to ensure that the seeding system rewards that behavior. Qualifying points based on wins and ties with tie breaker points based on a team's own alliance performance (not the opposing one's) should do that.

This is the system in place for this year. The remaining incentive which may influence behavior is the draft process. In my opinion, drafting 1 to 8 in both rounds would remove any incentive for a team to "throw" a match.

Under these circumstances, I cannot think of an ethical (or even gray area) which would justify a team "throwing" a match.
  #96   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 12-04-2013, 14:47
bduddy bduddy is offline
Registered User
FRC #0840 (ART)
Team Role: Alumni
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Rookie Year: 2005
Location: San Bruno, CA
Posts: 869
bduddy has a reputation beyond reputebduddy has a reputation beyond reputebduddy has a reputation beyond reputebduddy has a reputation beyond reputebduddy has a reputation beyond reputebduddy has a reputation beyond reputebduddy has a reputation beyond reputebduddy has a reputation beyond reputebduddy has a reputation beyond reputebduddy has a reputation beyond reputebduddy has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Winning a Match vs. Winning Strategically

Quote:
Originally Posted by rick.oliver View Post
The best way to ensure that each team plays to win every match is to ensure that the seeding system rewards that behavior. Qualifying points based on wins and ties with tie breaker points based on a team's own alliance performance (not the opposing one's) should do that.

This is the system in place for this year. The remaining incentive which may influence behavior is the draft process. In my opinion, drafting 1 to 8 in both rounds would remove any incentive for a team to "throw" a match.

Under these circumstances, I cannot think of an ethical (or even gray area) which would justify a team "throwing" a match.
I don't think many teams throw matches because of the "snake" drafting system - in any case, this would probably not be a good idea because, year after year, higher seeds still win more often anyway. What I see discussed much more often is the manipulation of matches to ensure that a certain team is or is not ranked highly, to try to ensure a given result in the first round of alliance selection, and I don't see how going to a 1-8, 1-8 system would change that. I do agree that the "simpler" ranking system this year has removed the incentive for the 6v0, etc., and I'm all for that.
__________________

Does anyone else remember when TBA signatures actually worked?
  #97   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 12-04-2013, 15:19
AllenGregoryIV's Avatar
AllenGregoryIV AllenGregoryIV is offline
Engineering Coach
AKA: Allen "JAG" Gregory
FRC #3847 (Spectrum)
Team Role: Coach
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Rookie Year: 2003
Location: Texas
Posts: 2,572
AllenGregoryIV has a reputation beyond reputeAllenGregoryIV has a reputation beyond reputeAllenGregoryIV has a reputation beyond reputeAllenGregoryIV has a reputation beyond reputeAllenGregoryIV has a reputation beyond reputeAllenGregoryIV has a reputation beyond reputeAllenGregoryIV has a reputation beyond reputeAllenGregoryIV has a reputation beyond reputeAllenGregoryIV has a reputation beyond reputeAllenGregoryIV has a reputation beyond reputeAllenGregoryIV has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to AllenGregoryIV
Re: Winning a Match vs. Winning Strategically

Quote:
Originally Posted by rick.oliver View Post
The best way to ensure that each team plays to win every match is to ensure that the seeding system rewards that behavior. Qualifying points based on wins and ties with tie breaker points based on a team's own alliance performance (not the opposing one's) should do that.

This is the system in place for this year. The remaining incentive which may influence behavior is the draft process. In my opinion, drafting 1 to 8 in both rounds would remove any incentive for a team to "throw" a match.

Under these circumstances, I cannot think of an ethical (or even gray area) which would justify a team "throwing" a match.
If the wildcard still exists then there is a very big incentive for a team to try to be an alliance captain on the opposite side of the bracket from the Wildcard generating alliances (often the #1 seed/alliance). Several times this season it has been beneficial for our team to lose. I tell my drivers to never throw a match but you can tell they have no incentive to win (we still won nearly all those matches).
__________________

Team 647 | Cyber Wolf Corps | Alumni | 2003-2006 | Shoemaker HS
Team 2587 | DiscoBots | Mentor | 2008-2011 | Rice University / Houston Food Bank
Team 3847 | Spectrum | Coach | 2012-20... | St Agnes Academy
LRI | Alamo Regional | 2014-20...
"Competition has been shown to be useful up to a certain point and no further, but cooperation, which is the thing we must strive for today, begins where competition leaves off." - Franklin D. Roosevelt
  #98   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 12-04-2013, 15:39
rick.oliver's Avatar
rick.oliver rick.oliver is offline
Mentor - Retired
AKA: Pap
no team
Team Role: Alumni
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Rookie Year: 2003
Location: Liberty Township, OH
Posts: 249
rick.oliver has a reputation beyond reputerick.oliver has a reputation beyond reputerick.oliver has a reputation beyond reputerick.oliver has a reputation beyond reputerick.oliver has a reputation beyond reputerick.oliver has a reputation beyond reputerick.oliver has a reputation beyond reputerick.oliver has a reputation beyond reputerick.oliver has a reputation beyond reputerick.oliver has a reputation beyond reputerick.oliver has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Winning a Match vs. Winning Strategically

Quote:
Originally Posted by bduddy View Post
I don't think many teams throw matches because of the "snake" drafting system - in any case, this would probably not be a good idea because, year after year, higher seeds still win more often anyway. What I see discussed much more often is the manipulation of matches to ensure that a certain team is or is not ranked highly, to try to ensure a given result in the first round of alliance selection, and I don't see how going to a 1-8, 1-8 system would change that. I do agree that the "simpler" ranking system this year has removed the incentive for the 6v0, etc., and I'm all for that.
I agree that the serpentine draft is likely not much of a factor in a decision to throw a match. There are certainly folks who do not like it for other reasons ... for another thread.

The manipulation of matches to influence the ranking of a specific team crosses the ethical line for me.
  #99   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 12-04-2013, 15:39
Chris is me's Avatar
Chris is me Chris is me is offline
no bag, vex only, final destination
AKA: Pinecone
FRC #0228 (GUS Robotics); FRC #2170 (Titanium Tomahawks)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Rookie Year: 2006
Location: Glastonbury, CT
Posts: 7,797
Chris is me has a reputation beyond reputeChris is me has a reputation beyond reputeChris is me has a reputation beyond reputeChris is me has a reputation beyond reputeChris is me has a reputation beyond reputeChris is me has a reputation beyond reputeChris is me has a reputation beyond reputeChris is me has a reputation beyond reputeChris is me has a reputation beyond reputeChris is me has a reputation beyond reputeChris is me has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to Chris is me
Re: Winning a Match vs. Winning Strategically

Quote:
Originally Posted by rick.oliver View Post
Under these circumstances, I cannot think of an ethical (or even gray area) which would justify a team "throwing" a match.
The big one you can never get rid of is when you're playing the #1 seed, you're the second best robot at the event, and you have a better alliance. There's no way to prevent that kind of match throwing, since there will always be an incentive to keep a better team #1 seed if you are the guaranteed first pick.
__________________
Mentor / Drive Coach: 228 (2016-?)
--2016 Waterbury SFs (with 3314, 3719), RIDE #2 Seed / Winners (with 1058, 6153), Carver QFs (with 503, 359, 4607)
Mentor / Consultant Person: 2170 (2017-?)
.
College Mentor: 2791 (2010-2015)
-- 2015 TVR Motorola Quality, FLR GM Industrial Design -- 2014 FLR Motorola Quality / SFs (with 341, 4930)
-- 2013 BAE Motorola Quality, WPI Regional #1 Seed / Delphi Excellence in Engineering / Finalists (with 20, 3182)
-- 2012 BAE Imagery / Finalists (with 1519, 885), CT Xerox Creativity / SFs (with 2168, 118)
Student: 1714 (2009) - 2009 MN 10K Lakes Regional Winners (with 2826, 2470)
2791 Build Season Photo Gallery - Look here for mechanism photos My Robotics Blog (Updated April 11 2014)
  #100   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 12-04-2013, 15:44
rick.oliver's Avatar
rick.oliver rick.oliver is offline
Mentor - Retired
AKA: Pap
no team
Team Role: Alumni
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Rookie Year: 2003
Location: Liberty Township, OH
Posts: 249
rick.oliver has a reputation beyond reputerick.oliver has a reputation beyond reputerick.oliver has a reputation beyond reputerick.oliver has a reputation beyond reputerick.oliver has a reputation beyond reputerick.oliver has a reputation beyond reputerick.oliver has a reputation beyond reputerick.oliver has a reputation beyond reputerick.oliver has a reputation beyond reputerick.oliver has a reputation beyond reputerick.oliver has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Winning a Match vs. Winning Strategically

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chris is me View Post
The big one you can never get rid of is when you're playing the #1 seed, you're the second best robot at the event, and you have a better alliance. There's no way to prevent that kind of match throwing, since there will always be an incentive to keep a better team #1 seed if you are the guaranteed first pick.
Assuming that you are not already the #2 seed, yes I see your point.
  #101   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 12-04-2013, 15:47
rick.oliver's Avatar
rick.oliver rick.oliver is offline
Mentor - Retired
AKA: Pap
no team
Team Role: Alumni
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Rookie Year: 2003
Location: Liberty Township, OH
Posts: 249
rick.oliver has a reputation beyond reputerick.oliver has a reputation beyond reputerick.oliver has a reputation beyond reputerick.oliver has a reputation beyond reputerick.oliver has a reputation beyond reputerick.oliver has a reputation beyond reputerick.oliver has a reputation beyond reputerick.oliver has a reputation beyond reputerick.oliver has a reputation beyond reputerick.oliver has a reputation beyond reputerick.oliver has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Winning a Match vs. Winning Strategically

Quote:
Originally Posted by AllenGregoryIV View Post
If the wildcard still exists then there is a very big incentive for a team to try to be an alliance captain on the opposite side of the bracket from the Wildcard generating alliances (often the #1 seed/alliance). Several times this season it has been beneficial for our team to lose. I tell my drivers to never throw a match but you can tell they have no incentive to win (we still won nearly all those matches).
I stand corrected. Twice ...
  #102   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 12-04-2013, 20:26
DampRobot's Avatar
DampRobot DampRobot is offline
Physics Major
AKA: Roger Romani
FRC #0100 (The Wildhats) and FRC#971 (Spartan Robotics)
Team Role: College Student
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Rookie Year: 2010
Location: Stanford University
Posts: 1,277
DampRobot has a reputation beyond reputeDampRobot has a reputation beyond reputeDampRobot has a reputation beyond reputeDampRobot has a reputation beyond reputeDampRobot has a reputation beyond reputeDampRobot has a reputation beyond reputeDampRobot has a reputation beyond reputeDampRobot has a reputation beyond reputeDampRobot has a reputation beyond reputeDampRobot has a reputation beyond reputeDampRobot has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Winning a Match vs. Winning Strategically

Quote:
Originally Posted by rick.oliver View Post
Under these circumstances, I cannot think of an ethical (or even gray area) which would justify a team "throwing" a match.
If your goal was to win the tournament, and loosing a match made it easier, I think that would certainly qualify as a grey area. It would be especially grey if your alliances agreed it was in their best interest to lose the match too.

I'm not sure if you read my first post on this thread or not, but essentially our motivation for loosing the match would be to keep a very inconsistent robot very high in the seedlings in order to break up and to weaken elimination alliances.
__________________
The mind is not a vessel to be filled, but a fire to be lighted.

-Plutarch
  #103   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 13-04-2013, 10:39
rick.oliver's Avatar
rick.oliver rick.oliver is offline
Mentor - Retired
AKA: Pap
no team
Team Role: Alumni
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Rookie Year: 2003
Location: Liberty Township, OH
Posts: 249
rick.oliver has a reputation beyond reputerick.oliver has a reputation beyond reputerick.oliver has a reputation beyond reputerick.oliver has a reputation beyond reputerick.oliver has a reputation beyond reputerick.oliver has a reputation beyond reputerick.oliver has a reputation beyond reputerick.oliver has a reputation beyond reputerick.oliver has a reputation beyond reputerick.oliver has a reputation beyond reputerick.oliver has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Winning a Match vs. Winning Strategically

Quote:
Originally Posted by DampRobot View Post
If your goal was to win the tournament, and loosing a match made it easier, I think that would certainly qualify as a grey area. It would be especially grey if your alliances agreed it was in their best interest to lose the match too.

I'm not sure if you read my first post on this thread or not, but essentially our motivation for loosing the match would be to keep a very inconsistent robot very high in the seedlings in order to break up and to weaken elimination alliances.
I did read your original post and read it over again before I posted that comment. As pointed out by others, I agree that late in the Qualification Rounds there may be circumstances which would cause a team to consider the consequences of losing versus winning a match.

I appreciate your transparency in sharing your situation and thought process. I also commend you for making the correct choice, in my opinion.

As I stated in my earlier post, I would strongly argue against ever throwing a match, regardless of the situation, based on my personal value system.

While I would support a team consensus (large majority) decision; i.e., I was unable to persuade them otherwise, I would be looking for a new team. I think that the example of the Olympic competition sited in an earlier post correctly illustrates the accepted view that such behavior is unethical and to be discouraged.
  #104   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 13-04-2013, 12:27
Hjelstrom's Avatar
Hjelstrom Hjelstrom is offline
Mentor
FRC #0987 (High Rollers)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Rookie Year: 2005
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 148
Hjelstrom has a reputation beyond reputeHjelstrom has a reputation beyond reputeHjelstrom has a reputation beyond reputeHjelstrom has a reputation beyond reputeHjelstrom has a reputation beyond reputeHjelstrom has a reputation beyond reputeHjelstrom has a reputation beyond reputeHjelstrom has a reputation beyond reputeHjelstrom has a reputation beyond reputeHjelstrom has a reputation beyond reputeHjelstrom has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Winning a Match vs. Winning Strategically

Quote:
Originally Posted by rick.oliver View Post
I did read your original post and read it over again before I posted that comment. As pointed out by others, I agree that late in the Qualification Rounds there may be circumstances which would cause a team to consider the consequences of losing versus winning a match.

I appreciate your transparency in sharing your situation and thought process. I also commend you for making the correct choice, in my opinion.

As I stated in my earlier post, I would strongly argue against ever throwing a match, regardless of the situation, based on my personal value system.

While I would support a team consensus (large majority) decision; i.e., I was unable to persuade them otherwise, I would be looking for a new team. I think that the example of the Olympic competition sited in an earlier post correctly illustrates the accepted view that such behavior is unethical and to be discouraged.
I agree, kudos to the poster making the right decision. In my opinion it is never reasonable to throw a match. Play your best every match, play to win. Your team should value its integrity over "strategically winning".
  #105   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 13-04-2013, 13:01
Racer26 Racer26 is offline
Registered User
no team
Team Role: Alumni
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Rookie Year: 2003
Location: Beaverton, ON
Posts: 2,229
Racer26 has a reputation beyond reputeRacer26 has a reputation beyond reputeRacer26 has a reputation beyond reputeRacer26 has a reputation beyond reputeRacer26 has a reputation beyond reputeRacer26 has a reputation beyond reputeRacer26 has a reputation beyond reputeRacer26 has a reputation beyond reputeRacer26 has a reputation beyond reputeRacer26 has a reputation beyond reputeRacer26 has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Winning a Match vs. Winning Strategically

Quote:
Originally Posted by AllenGregoryIV View Post
If the wildcard still exists then there is a very big incentive for a team to try to be an alliance captain on the opposite side of the bracket from the Wildcard generating alliances (often the #1 seed/alliance). Several times this season it has been beneficial for our team to lose. I tell my drivers to never throw a match but you can tell they have no incentive to win (we still won nearly all those matches).
We saw this a bunch of times in Canada this season. Teams declining the #4 and #5 alliance captains, preferring to captain their own alliance from the #6 or #7 spot (because the winner of #4/#5 faces the winner of #1/#8 in semis). To earn the wildcard you had to make it to finals. Going through 1114/2056 to get there from the #4/#5 is extremely difficult. Going through the #2 or #3 alliance (or both) to get there is still difficult, but less so.
Closed Thread


Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:55.

The Chief Delphi Forums are sponsored by Innovation First International, Inc.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi