An in depth look at the Michigan State Championship

[Huskie65]

Originally Posted by Gary Dillard

Lunchtime Friday observation:

Team 3572 has had 6 matches, their alliance scores have been 160,145,122,112,175,181.

They are 1-5; their only win was the 112 score.

Ouch.

That 186-181 match (#57) must have been a heartbreaker.
I would guess that 181 is the highest score posted by a losing alliance this year

FYI at MSC the LOSING alliance average score is currently 111.5!
winning:150.6
So competitive...

[Ether]

This spreadsheet has two tables analyzing the Qual schedule:

1) For each team at MSC, what teams were on alliances with them, and

2) For each team at MSC, what teams were on alliances against them

http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/at...8&d=1365722972

[Gregor]

The average loosing score at MSC is higher than the average winning score at Waterloo. I'm impressed.

EDIT: 33, 67, and 1918 just put up an insane score. New world high score, 247, with 3 foul points.

33 climber for 10, 67 climbed for 30 and dumped 15.

1918 was at the 20 point level, with 3 red disks in possession, when they fell.

[Richard Wallace]

What was the auton score for Red?

[Gregor]

Originally Posted by Richard Wallace

What was the auton score for Red?

I saw 1 missed disk out of 13, so somewhere in the 72 range.

[Lil' Lavery]

Originally Posted by Richard Wallace

What was the auton score for Red?

From my count, it should be 72. Looks like they hit 12/13 shots.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1ohLW...Kd9wHV&index=2

[Joe Ross]

Originally Posted by Gregor

33, 67, and 1918 just put up an insane score. New world high score, 247, with 3 foul points.

33 climber for 10, 67 climbed for 30 and dumped 15.

1918 was at the 20 point level, with 3 red disks in possession, when they fell.

For those who missed it: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1ohLWO_Du60

Originally Posted by Richard Wallace

What was the auton score for Red?

According to twitter, 72

[MichaelBick]

Originally Posted by Gregor

The average loosing score at MSC is higher than the average winning score at Waterloo. I'm impressed.

EDIT: 33, 67, and 1918 just put up an insane score. New world high score, 247, with 3 foul points.

33 climber for 10, 67 climbed for 30 and dumped 15.

1918 was at the 20 point level, with 3 red disks in possession, when they fell.

didn't 1114 and 2056 put up a 277 score?

[Gregor]

Originally Posted by MICHAELABICK

didn't 1114 and 2056 put up a 277 score?

With 89 foul points.

Another match they put up 243 no fouls.

[ErvinI]

Originally Posted by MICHAELABICK

didn't 1114 and 2056 put up a 277 score?

That was with 89 foul points.

I believe they also scored 244 once with 4069. Not sure what the foul points there were.

EDIT: Ninja'd. Gregor above me is right in both instances. Waterloo Q28 was the 277 points match, while Q1M2 was 243 points without fouls.

Matches in question: Q1M2 and Q28

[Gregor]

Have the point rankings for who qualified for championships been posted anywhere? When/where will they be posted?

[vikesrock777]

Originally Posted by Gregor

Have the point rankings for who qualified for championships been posted anywhere? When/where will they be posted?

My tentative answer from what I could see on the webcast.

http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/sh...2&postcount=49

[Ed Law]

Originally Posted by Gregor

Have the point rankings for who qualified for championships been posted anywhere? When/where will they be posted?

I finished processing the official final FiM rankings and gave it to my daughter Kristen (the FiM webmaster) to post. It should be up by now. There is a link from the home page at www.firstinmichigan.org

[Gregor]

Originally Posted by Ed Law

I finished processing the official final FiM rankings and gave it to my daughter Kristen (the FiM webmaster) to post. It should be up by now. There is a link from the home page at www.firstinmichigan.org

Hi Ed. I think I may have found a small error. It says that 910 has registered for champs, but the FIRST site says differently.

[Ed Law]

Originally Posted by Gregor

Hi Ed. I think I may have found a small error. It says that 910 has registered for champs, but the FIRST site says differently.

A representative from FIRST confirmed that 910 received an invitation to attend recently and 910 intended to go but did not have a chance to pay yet. Hence their team number did not show up as of today. It is not an error.