|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
Rating:
|
Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Michigan State Championship
Any word on who won the awards? The website doesn't seem to be updating.
EDIT: From the stream: 27, 503, 2337 are state chairman's 4810 - RAS EI - 2604 Last edited by Grim Tuesday : 13-04-2013 at 18:17. |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Michigan State Championship
Quote:
Event winners are 469, 3539, and 217. Rookie All-Star Award winner is 4810. Engineering Inspiration Award winner is 2604. The list of team qualifying by points (if I was understanding the webcast correctly): 1. 469 2. 2054 3. 3539 4. 67 5. 1718 6. 33 7. 1918 8. 862 9. 245 10. 2145 11. 2474 12. 3414 13. 2959 14. 217 15. 27 16. 3656 17. 2000 18. 3641 19. 2851 20. 2612 21. 2137 22. 1189 23. 70 24. 68 25. 2619 26. 314 The next 4 in line points-wise are 1684, 3572, 2767, and 3618. These are the ones the get to sign up if some from the above drop from my understanding. note-some of these may be wrong, the webcast was blurry and numbers were small. Last edited by vikesrock777 : 13-04-2013 at 18:49. Reason: 1718 not 1717. 33 did qualify. 1918 did as well. List should be accurate now. |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Michigan State Championship
I find it unlikely that 1717 qualified from MSC as they are from California (your #5).
|
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Michigan State Championship
Fixed. Was meant to be 1718, The Fighting Pi. Thanks.
|
|
#5
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Michigan State Championship
That can't be right, did 33 really not qualify?
|
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Michigan State Championship
That's exatly what I just thought of!?!
1918 didnt make it either, I guess... |
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Michigan State Championship
33 definitely qualified, they were the first pick of the alliance 68 was on (1718's) and did better in the district season and 68 qualified. I remember there being a list of 26 on the screen and Vikes only has 24 so it's safe to say 33 qualified.
|
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Michigan State Championship
Yup, you guys are right. I went back and listened to the already archived webcast from FiM. 33 and 1918 have been added to my list and I'm much more confident in its accuracy now. Sorry about that. I think I skipped from 1718 to 1918 when looking at the list because they looked the same with the blur.
Last edited by vikesrock777 : 13-04-2013 at 18:46. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|